Thanks Upayavira: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KittyProposal
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
As I understand it, Kitty has not yet been accepted, and therefore is
not yet a podling, so the SVN steps below are premature.
You should create a proposal on
At the advisement of the list, we have created a brand-new thread here
for voting on the kitty proposal.
The wiki page is located at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KittyProposal
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1 (Not binding)
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:20 AM, msacks ntw...@gmail.com wrote:
At the advisement of the list, we have created a brand-new thread here
for voting on the kitty proposal.
The wiki page is located at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KittyProposal
Thanks.
- Original Message
From: David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 7:33:45 PM
Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 04:22 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
FWIW, what Subversion uses:
This seems a very workable approach - going through Jira for everything
is too much work on the part of the contributer.
On the one hand, I want to stand off and let any community make its own way
within the light constraints of the license policy. On the other hand, I am
honestly mystified
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 04:22 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
FWIW, what Subversion uses:
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/community-guide.html#patches
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/community-guide.html#patch-manager
Briefly, all patches go to dev@, and only
On Sep 15, 2010, at 4:41 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 7:33:45 PM
Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 04:22 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
- Original Message
From: Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 8:05:01 PM
Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling
On Sep 15, 2010, at 4:41 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From:
On 15/09/2010 08:27, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
+1 (Not binding)
Another +1 (non-binding)
p
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:20 AM, msacks ntw...@gmail.com wrote:
At the advisement of the list, we have created a brand-new thread here
for voting on the kitty proposal.
The wiki page is located
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 19:41 -0400, Benson Margulies wrote:
This seems a very workable approach - going through Jira for everything
is too much work on the part of the contributer.
On the one hand, I want to stand off and let any community make its own way
within the light
10 matches
Mail list logo
