Looks ok, +1.
The binary jar whirr-cli-0.1.0-incubating.jar is missing the incubator
DISCLAIMER file but that file is in the other artifacts like the src
distro so i guess its enough to just fix that next time. Its also a
bit hard to work out if all the licenses are included for all the
stuff that
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Urs Lerch wrote:
> ...since ALOIS should
> become a community project, I still think the followers of it should
> decide which communication channell they prefer. (By the way, I myself
> sure am no fan of chats.)...
See also our comments in the "Real-time com
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Eric Johnson wrote:
> ...We intend to follow what we understand of the Apache way as best we can -
> including holding discussions publicly, voting on releases publicly, paying
> careful attention to licensing concerns, using tools that Apache folks are
> comf
>> ...since ALOIS should
>> become a community project, I still think the followers of it should
>> decide which communication channell they prefer. (By the way, I myself
>> sure am no fan of chats.)...
>
> The "if it didn't happen on the dev list, it didn't happen" rule is
> not negociable, althou
On 15.09.2010 09:20, msacks wrote:
At the advisement of the list, we have created a brand-new thread here
for voting on the kitty proposal.
The wiki page is located at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KittyProposal
+1 (non-binding)
I'm interested in contributing also.
Regards,
Rainer
-
+1 (binding)
On Sep 15, 2010, at 3:20 AM, msacks wrote:
> At the advisement of the list, we have created a brand-new thread here
> for voting on the kitty proposal.
> The wiki page is located at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KittyProposal
>
> Thanks.
>
>
I still don't see how that gets around the perception, and the
reality, that development is being done outside the list.
So I don't see that proposal as helping out at all...
On Sep 16, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Scott Deboy wrote:
> I understand the concern raised by the use of real-time communication f
Hi
To cut a long story short: ALOIS is _not_ about a chat channel, it's a
tool for security incident and event management. Since the chat channell
in the required resources list was only a wish, I gladly dropped it off
the proposal.
Best
Urs
Am Freitag, den 17.09.2010, 07:32 -0400 schrieb Jim J
On 9/17/2010 9:41 AM, Urs Lerch wrote:
> To cut a long story short: ALOIS is _not_ about a chat channel, it's a
> tool for security incident and event management. Since the chat channell
> in the required resources list was only a wish, I gladly dropped it off
> the proposal.
Hi Urs,
While I cert
+1. It's hypocrisy to tell podlings that chat is entirely intolerable
when plenty of running projects have them.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Glen Daniels wrote:
> On 9/17/2010 9:41 AM, Urs Lerch wrote:
>> To cut a long story short: ALOIS is _not_ about a chat channel, it's a
>> tool for secu
Hi Glen
Thanks for your input and a different view. I took the chat channell off
the proposal, because I don't want that the project to be assessed on
this single point. If a chat is useful for the followers, why not, as
long as it is transparent and decisions are not made that way.
Best
Urs
Am
On 09/17/2010 08:20 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
+1. It's hypocrisy to tell podlings that chat is entirely intolerable
when plenty of running projects have them.
+1 indeed. If not, ATS is in big trouble :). We have a very active
community in the IRC room, where we brainstorm and help each othe
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 09/17/2010 08:20 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>> +1. It's hypocrisy to tell podlings that chat is entirely intolerable
>> when plenty of running projects have them.
>
> +1 indeed. If not, ATS is in big trouble :). We have a very active
On 9/17/2010 11:27 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>> +1 indeed. If not, ATS is in big trouble :). We have a very active community
>> in the IRC room, where we brainstorm and help each other out all the time
>
> I don't think anybody said
Raindrops, Senaca I will add you to the wiki page as contributors. Thanks
for jumping in. It might be a while until I am able to get to a computer and
put you on there.
On Sep 17, 2010 3:31 AM, "Rainer Jung" wrote:
> On 15.09.2010 09:20, msacks wrote:
>> At the advisement of the list, we have cre
Hi all,
after 72 hours (actually almost 77 now :) this vote has started and
together with those received on the podling list [1],
we have now received sufficient IPMC binding votes to proceed with the
release of Chemistry OpenCMIS 0.1.0.
Resuming, we got 3 binding IPMC +1 votes and no 0 or -
+1
Checked that src tarball has a correct signature & md5sum. Also ran RAT
over the extracted sources and the licensing looks good.
Doug
On 09/14/2010 11:19 AM, Tom White wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Whirr, version
0.1.0-incubating. We already received one binding I
17 matches
Mail list logo
