[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding).
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@
Ketih,
> I think Italo is incorrect saying voting "no" would be a defeat for
> free software. It is an honest mistake. People don't know what else
> could happen, because alternatives are not being discussed.
They have been discussed. Even at this list. We have discussed to say
"no" to OOo at the
+1
Ralph
On Jun 10, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
>
> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down,
> I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an Apache
> Incub
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:44 AM, ant elder wrote:
> I'm an Incubator PMC member so have a binding vote, but I'm also an
> IBM employee, on this vote I abstain.
>
> ...ant
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSI
I'm an Incubator PMC member so have a binding vote, but I'm also an
IBM employee, on this vote I abstain.
...ant
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
>
> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads
> Maybe the "people from LibreOffice" are not voting against because, even
> though they believe there could have been better solutions, given the
> current situation they prefer that OOo is approved as a podling: see
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/5824 for
> a mor
I have been active before :). So the vote is binding.
Sanjiva.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:42 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 6/10/2011 12:04 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> >
> > (Officially I'm on the incubator PMC I believe but I have not been active
> ..
> > so lets chalk this up for non
On 10/06/2011 Keith Curtis wrote:
> P.S. I don't see many from LibreOffice voting against this proposal, so I
> joined again to vote on their behalf.
Maybe the "people from LibreOffice" are not voting against because, even
though they believe there could have been better solutions, given the
curre
On 2:59 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
>
> This vote will close 72 hours from now.
+1
Glad and Good Luck!
---
Hi Rob,
Thanks.
> But as you know, translation is only one part of localization. I hope
> that with your participation, and with help from RedOffice experts who
> have joined this project, that we can further improve the CJK support in
> OOo.
You are right! This is what I would like to help dev
Hi all,
My name is Simon Brouwer. For my profession, I develop electronics and
firmware for auto-ID equipment such as hand-held data collection
terminals. In my free time I have been active in OpenOffice.org since
2001 and have been project lead of the Dutch native-lang subproject
since its b
On 05/06/2011 Nick Kew wrote:
> On 5 Jun 2011, at 09:25, eric b wrote:
> > Apologies, the most up to date information is here :
> > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/External/Modules
> Thanks for that.
> Looks like there's some LGPL stuff but no strong copyleft.
Most dictionaries are missin
+1 (binding)
Ate
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (non-binding) Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Best regards,
Carl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Mark Struberg wrote on Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 23:09:21 +0100:
> PS: I fear there is a misunderstanding regarding binding vs non-binding
> votes. Binding votes can only be cast by a IncubatorPMC member [1]. But of
> course, also non-binding +1 are welcome ;)
>
I'm going to be less roundabout:
Rom
On Jun 10, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down,
> I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an Apache
> Incubator project.
>
> At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.
+1
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
>
> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
> down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
> Apache Incubator
I think we should give it a try.
+1 (binding)
LieGrue,
strub
PS: I fear there is a misunderstanding regarding binding vs non-binding votes.
Binding votes can only be cast by a IncubatorPMC member [1]. But of course,
also non-binding +1 are welcome ;)
[1] http://people.apache.org/committers-b
Hi Malte,
great to have you on board :)
Best regards
Simon
Op 10-6-2011 18:16, Malte Timmermann schreef:
Hi,
my name is Malte Timmermann, and I work on the code base of
OpenOffice.org since 1991 - almost from the beginning.
It started with StarDivision, later acquired by Sun, later acquire
Hi Kevin and Allen,
Thanks!
I see ! "podling" is an Apache's coinage.
It means "a project in the incubation stage."
Very clear. Now I can tell my Japanese friends all about
OpenOffice.org going into ASF :)
I was looking for "podle" in my dictionary but I couldn't find it,
it's natural :)
"pod
[ X ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
non-binding
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Greetings khirano,
> Can you tell me what "podling" is?
"podling" is a made up (meaning invented) word that the ASF uses to refer to
a project in the incubation stage. The word "podling" is formed by the root
word "pod" (which should be in your dictionary) and the suffix "-ling" which
means "sma
>Can you tell me what "podling" is?
http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#Podling
HTH
--
Kevin
Hi Ross and Greg,
Thanks.
Can you tell me what "podling" is?
I could not find "podling" in my English-Japanese dictionary.
Should be between "podium" and "podocarpus," right?
:)
Thanks,
khirano
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general
Keith Curtis wrote:
-1
My list of 44 reasons is here:
http://keithcu.com/wordpress/?p=2567
To boil it down to one: this plan as announced had several big flaws, and
they still exist.
Kind regards,
-Keith
P.S. I don't see many from LibreOffice voting against this proposal, so I
joined again t
-1
I do not think that accepting this podling is in the best interest
of the ASF. Absent explicit criteria / principles governing what
we accept into the Incubator, I have to apply informal judgment here
and I am voting -1 for the following reasons:
0) I think the ASF has a responsibility to co
Hi,
[ +1 ] (non binding) Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Thanks !
Eric Bachard
--
qɔᴉɹə
Education Project:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project
Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page
L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org
Blog : http://
+1 (binding)
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 10 Jun 2011, at 17:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
> *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
>
> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down,
> I would like to initiate th
+1 (Non-binding)
Thanks,
Kazunari Hirano
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
-0 (binding)
My concerns:
- It wasn't the community that wanted to join Apache but commercial
entities decided and now the community is forced to join or stay away
- The OOo code base, eco system, and user base is huge and should be
managed by its own foundation
- A copy-left license fits well for
-1
My list of 44 reasons is here:
http://keithcu.com/wordpress/?p=2567
To boil it down to one: this plan as announced had several big flaws, and
they still exist.
Kind regards,
-Keith
P.S. I don't see many from LibreOffice voting against this proposal, so I
joined again to vote on their behalf
[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
On 06/10/2011 06:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOf
On 2011/06/10 10:02 AM Sam Ruby wrote:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
+1 (Non-binding)
--
_
Larry I. Gusaas
Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada
Website: htt
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> [ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
+1 (Non-binding)
--
Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men
will do the
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)
Comment: While I favor focusing on the reference implementation for ODF, as my
previous comments reflect, I believe that and related scope decisions about
releases and deployment are a matter for the podling to work through.
-
On 6/10/2011 2:04 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> Please. Being on a PMC can't *reduce* one's rights.
>
> So, if I were on the PMC and I said "+1 (intentionally non-binding)",
> I would expect it not to be counted as binding.
Then state "I would vote +1 but haven't spent sufficient time reviewing
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Jomar Silva
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (non-binding)
-Stephan
Hi,
[ x ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
(binding)
Good luck! May the source be with you.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote on Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:12:54 -0500:
> On 6/10/2011 12:04 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> >
> > (Officially I'm on the incubator PMC I believe but I have not been active ..
> > so lets chalk this up for non-binding.)
>
> Then you just cast a binding vote. Feel free
[ X ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
Cheers
Daniel
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
>
>
+1
There are many reasons that this project might fail at Apache. These
reasons have been brought up and discussed enough that I feel
comfortable giving the project the chance to prove that it can be
successful.
Craig
On Jun 10, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your S
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
>
> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
> down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
> Apache Incubator projec
On Jun 10, 2011 9:03 AM, "Sam Ruby" wrote:
>...
> [ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
+1 (binding)
-0 (binding)
I concur with Sanjiva and it seems to be just a political move to me.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 19:04, Sanjiva Weerawarana
wrote:
> -1, as I feel this is not in the best interests of the world but rather of a
> few powers.
>
> (Officially I'm on the incubator PMC I believe but I have
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Yegor Kozlov wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
>>
>> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
>> down, I wou
+1
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
>
> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
> down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
> Apache Incubator pr
+1 (binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1
On 10/06/2011 17:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down, I
would like to
initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an Apache Incubator project.
At the end
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Roman H. Gelbort wrote:
> El 10/06/11 14:17, Roman H. Gelbort escribió:
> > +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
> >
> and binding
>
> --
>
> ---
> Prof. Román H.
+1 (non-binding)
Andy Brown
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
El 10/06/11 14:17, Roman H. Gelbort escribió:
> +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
>
and binding
--
---
Prof. Román H. Gelbort
No busquemos aplicaciones que reemplacen aplicaciones,
sino aplicaciones que res
+1 binding, of course...
On Jun 10, 2011, at 12:08 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> [+1] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: g
+1 (binding)
Cheers!
-- Leif
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Andrew Rist wrote:
> I would also point out that this is not a case of moving from Copy Left
> to Permissive licensing. In this case, the code base is moving from
> dual-licensing (Copy Left and Proprietary) to Permissive.
I made the same point elsewhere. Also, while I appreciate clarification
+1
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
>
-1 (non-binding)
This proposal is for the hosting of all OpenOffice.org services by the ASF,
and mandates for items such a
+1
-louis
On 2011-06-10 13:41 , Sander van der Waal wrote:
>> Please cast your votes:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
>> [ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
>> [ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
>>
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Sander
> --
Counters typically check the names against the pmc roster, so it's ok
-- dims
On 06/10/2011 01:38 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Yes, me too.
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> I forgot to add (binding) to my +1, but I don't think I'm alone.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 1
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
>
+1 (non-binding)
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gene
Yes, me too.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I forgot to add (binding) to my +1, but I don't think I'm alone.
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:12 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> wrote:
>> On 6/10/2011 12:04 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
>>>
>>> (Officially I'm on the incubator
+1 (non-binding)
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr..
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:02:44PM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
> [ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
+1 (binding)
Marvin Humphrey
---
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 05:45:03PM +0100, Simon Phipps wrote:
> For us outsiders, can you explain who is allowed to vote and in what way,
> please?
Official policy:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Entry+to+Incubation
Entry Into Incubation
...
In order
+1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
--
---
Prof. Román H. Gelbort
No busquemos aplicaciones que reemplacen aplicaciones,
sino aplicaciones que resuelvan problemas específicos...
http://www.piensalibre.com.ar
I forgot to add (binding) to my +1, but I don't think I'm alone.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:12 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 6/10/2011 12:04 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
>>
>> (Officially I'm on the incubator PMC I believe but I have not been active ..
>> so lets chalk this up for non-bind
On 6/10/2011 12:04 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
>
> (Officially I'm on the incubator PMC I believe but I have not been active ..
> so lets chalk this up for non-binding.)
Then you just cast a binding vote. Feel free to change it, or withdraw it,
but the committee roster determines which binds.
+1 (binding)
regards,
Karl
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> +1
>
> -> richard
>
> On 6/10/11 12:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>> *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
>>
>> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be windi
On 6/10/2011 11:45 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> For us outsiders, can you explain who is allowed to vote and in what way,
> please?
Everyone is welcome to vote.
Binding votes include all Incubator Project Management Committee members.
Non-binding votes can and do influence the opinions of committee
+1
-> richard
On 6/10/11 12:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be
winding down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept
OpenOffice.org as an Apache Incubator project.
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
-1, as I feel this is not in the best interests of the world but rather of a
few powers.
(Officially I'm on the incubator PMC I believe but I have not been active ..
so lets chalk this up for non-binding.)
Sanjiva.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> *** Please change your Subje
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [X ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
>
> This vote will close 72 hours from now.
>
>
(non-binding)
Phil
+1
non-binding
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
>
> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
> down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
> Apache
Sorry, should have said +1 [binding]
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Danese Cooper wrote:
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [ +1 ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
>
> Danese
>
On 10 June 2011 17:49, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Simon,
>
> Anyone interested can VOTE. If u see some of the votes they have
> "(binding)" in the text, those are from folks on the incubator pmc.
> Ultimately if we see a whole bunch of -1's then we check which way the
> pmc voted to decide if the
binding is used by members of the incubator pmc [1]
-- dims
[1] http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#incubator-pmc
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Ian Lynch wrote:
> Sorry for ignorance but what does binding - non-binding mean?
>
> --
> Ian
>
> Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications
+1 (non-binding)
S.
Sorry for ignorance but what does binding - non-binding mean?
--
Ian
Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications (The Schools ITQ)
www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940
The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth,
Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and
Awesome, thanks.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> Anyone is allowed to vote. If you vote against, please, explain why.
> Most of votes do not count anyway, negative votes are usually
> addressed.
>
> --
> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> Alexei Fedotov / Але
Simon,
Anyone interested can VOTE. If u see some of the votes they have
"(binding)" in the text, those are from folks on the incubator pmc.
Ultimately if we see a whole bunch of -1's then we check which way the
pmc voted to decide if the proposal was accepted or not.
So please go ahead and vote t
Anyone is allowed to vote. If you vote against, please, explain why.
Most of votes do not count anyway, negative votes are usually
addressed.
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:45 PM, S
For us outsiders, can you explain who is allowed to vote and in what way,
please?
S.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Allen Pulsifer
wrote:
>
> The net result of these issues are that project participants may have
> differing opinions on whether they want to either (a) include code for a
> possible patented technology or (b) include code to work around a
> potentially patented te
> Sam wrote:
> Before proceeding, I would like to seek advice from our counsel. I also
want to proceed based
> on specific patent infringement concerns and not on abstract
hypotheticals. However, I don't
> want to spend valuable time on this until we decide whether or not to
accept this project f
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Non-binding.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding)
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:20 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 6/10/2011 11:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>> Please cast your votes:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
>
> +1 [binding]
>
> ---
+1 (non-binding)
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:20 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 6/10/2011 11:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>> Please cast your votes:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Accept OpenOff
On 6/10/2011 11:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
+1 [binding]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
On 6/10/11 12:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be
winding down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept
OpenOffice.org as
Please cast your votes:
[ +1 ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Danese
Hi,
my name is Malte Timmermann, and I work on the code base of
OpenOffice.org since 1991 - almost from the beginning.
It started with StarDivision, later acquired by Sun, later acquired by
Oracle. While still being an Oracle employee, my engagement here will be
on an individual base.
Amon
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
Please cast your votes:
I'm +1
If accepted, I'll try to help out with the podling, but alas I've not got
time at the moment to take on a full mentorship role of it.
Nick
-
To unsubscrib
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Volker Merschmann
wrote:
Some fundamental comments about the license have been written down by
the FSF: http://www.fsf.org/news/openoffice-apache-libreoffice
That's worthy of a new subject line.
While the first line of the first paragraph is inaccurate (we ha
[+1] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
On Jun 10, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
>
> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down,
> I would like to initiate the vote to accept
+1
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
>
> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
> down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
> Apache Incubator pr
+1
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
>
> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
> down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
> Apache Incubator
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
Apache Incubator project.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the cur
On Jun 10, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Volker Merschmann wrote:
>>
> Some fundamental comments about the license have been written down by
> the FSF: http://www.fsf.org/news/openoffice-apache-libreoffice
>
As posted on the discuss@ list... So what?
It would be trivially easy for someone here to post a
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Volker Merschmann
wrote:
>>
> Some fundamental comments about the license have been written down by
> the FSF: http://www.fsf.org/news/openoffice-apache-libreoffice
That's worthy of a new subject line.
While the first line of the first paragraph is inaccurate (w
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
