+1
Tom
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Mohammad Islam misla...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi All,
The discussion about Oozie proposal is settling down. Therefore I would like
to
initiate a vote to accept Oozie as an Apache Incubator project.
The latest proposal is pasted at the end and it could
Hi folks!
What is the best approach for setting up a project blog for incubator projects?
For TLPs we have
http://blogs.apache.org/
Should I ask for a section for Isis over there, or do we maintain a separated
incubator blog area somewhere?
txs and LieGrue,
strub
Hi,
We are currently uses Apache Blogs for Hama-incubating project.
You can request it on infrastructure@ list.
Thanks.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi folks!
What is the best approach for setting up a project blog for incubator
projects?
For
-Original Message-
From: Edward J. Yoon [mailto:edwardy...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, 1 July 2011 6:38 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Blogs for incubator projects?
Hi,
We are currently uses Apache Blogs for Hama-incubating project.
You can request it on
I am not certain on this point, but I believe Jack Cai would be
interested in being a mentor. I don't think he is subscribed to this
mailing list tho.
Jack?
Bill
On 6/29/11 9:12 PM, Chen Liu wrote:
Hi,all,
Now, Bluesky project calls for a new mentor to guide us to complete the
release
I would like to see this vote suspended until we can get some feedback
from Jack Cai re whether he is willing to be a mentor.
Bill
On 6/28/11 1:49 AM, berndf wrote:
Hi everyone,
this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling.
3.5 years into incubation, the podling has not made progress in
Bill Stoddard wrote:
I would like to see this vote suspended until we can get some feedback
from Jack Cai re whether he is willing to be a mentor.
I concur that we should suspend this vote pending the outcome of the
project's attempt to reboot.
--- Noel
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Mohammad Islam misla...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose Oozie to be an Apache Incubator project.
Oozie is a server-based workflow scheduling and coordination system to
manage
data processing jobs for Apache Hadoop.
Here's a
We continue to discuss moving this work to Apache. Feedback so far
has been to try for an eventual TLP. We're starting to draft the
Incubation proposal. We talked to the maintainer of the C#/AODL
component and he confirmed that it is not really active anymore. He
might move it to bitbucket.
Based on the email trail recently, I'm in favor of completing the
vote. I think that there is sufficient evidence that this project has
'failed to launch' as an Apache community, and should go put itself on
github. If enough people disagree, they can vote -1.
My vote is +1 to retire.
On Fri, Jul
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Rob Weir wrote:
We continue to discuss moving this work to Apache. Feedback so far has
been to try for an eventual TLP. We're starting to draft the Incubation
proposal. We talked to the maintainer of the C#/AODL component and he
confirmed that it is not really active
This reflects my sentiments as well.
Regards,
Alan
On Jul 1, 2011, at 7:49 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Based on the email trail recently, I'm in favor of completing the
vote. I think that there is sufficient evidence that this project has
'failed to launch' as an Apache community, and
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Based on the email trail recently, I'm in favor of completing the
vote. I think that there is sufficient evidence that this project has
'failed to launch' as an Apache community, and should go put itself on
github.
On 7/1/2011 10:19 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Based on the email trail recently, I'm in favor of completing the
vote. I think that there is sufficient evidence that this project has
'failed to launch' as an Apache
Hi all,
The Apache Hama community voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Hama 0.3-incubating (RC2). This release contains performance
improvements and new features e.g., maven build, web UI for Hama
cluster, MessageBundle, Dijkstra's Shortest Path and PageRank
examples.
Please vote
+1
Doug
On 06/29/2011 12:10 PM, Mohammad Islam wrote:
Hi All,
The discussion about Oozie proposal is settling down. Therefore I would like
to
initiate a vote to accept Oozie as an Apache Incubator project.
The latest proposal is pasted at the end and it could be found in the wiki as
Due to career changes I'm going to have a lot less time for open
source activities, even less than the paltry time I have now for
monitoring mailing lists and helping out. Please accept this as my
resignation from the Jena and JSPWiki podlings.
- Dave
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net]
Sent: Saturday, 2 July 2011 1:24 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bluesky calls for a new mentor!
On 7/1/2011 10:19 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Benson
On Jul 1, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net]
Sent: Saturday, 2 July 2011 1:24 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bluesky calls for a new mentor!
On 7/1/2011 10:19 AM, Luciano Resende
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
Are we to keep on creating new committer accts for these folks knowing damn
well
that at the end of the term they disappear and a new lot appears? This is why
they (
when they did commit) shared accounts.
What if
I would support a one month wait. No more. They've had a long time. One
month is long enough to show seriousness. With no movement in that time,
a swift vote can close the project down.
Upayavira
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:36 -0400, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com
wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
I
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
I would support a one month wait. No more. They've had a long time. One
month is long enough to show seriousness. With no movement in that time,
a swift vote can close the project down.
+1
Christian
Upayavira
On Fri, 01
Hi Hen,
To confirm, will you be doing the following steps:
* Investigate whether the source was covered by CLAs.
* If so then update the web page before moving to retired.
* Otherwise delete the source from svn.
Yes, i noted that and will care on it.
Do you have any tipps how I can make
The vote does not need to be suspended. It perhaps would be enough to
leave the vote open for a month. If there is at least one -1 by then the
podling might continue to exist, otherwise it is retired.
My non-binding vote on retirement:
+1
Cheers,
Andreas
---
Am 01.07.2011 23:28, schrieb
+1 to retire Bluesky (binding)
I see no reason for suspending the vote. We've been round this
particular merry-go-round many times already. Each time we're told
we'll do better. The votes been called lets just move on, the ASF is
not the right home for this project for the reasons already
+1 (Binding)
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
+1 to retire Bluesky (binding)
I see no reason for suspending the vote. We've been round this
particular merry-go-round many times already. Each time we're told
we'll do better. The votes been called
+1 for retiring Bluesky
I believe that the Bluesky project is well-intentioned but just
doesn't belong at Apache.
The coders do not use mail lists for discussions of design, code,
infrastructure, or other aspects of project management that Apache
projects must do. If it didn't happen on
We're preparing for the 4th version release.
We need the whole July to do this work,thanks for your patience.
2011/7/2 Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk
I would support a one month wait. No more. They've had a long time. One
month is long enough to show seriousness. With no movement in that time,
a
I concur with Craig's thoughts.
+1 to retire (binding).
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 19:27, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
+1 for retiring Bluesky
I believe that the Bluesky project is well-intentioned but just doesn't
belong at Apache.
The coders do not use mail lists for
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
I concur with Craig's thoughts.
+1 to retire (binding).
+1, even with the whole discussion that there is a need for open
development right now and not in the future, the last Chen Lu messages
keeps trying to by more time with
+1 (non-binding) for the retirement proposal.
Chen, the vote has nothing to do with whether you manage to release
the 4th version or not, and the failure to see that and the failure to
understand what Apache and the incubator is about is a testament to
why the project should be retired, in my
+1 (non-binding)
Looking at the (lack of) progress and interest, I think its time to
end incubation for Bluesky.
- Henry
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:49 PM, berndf ber...@apache.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling.
3.5 years into incubation, the podling has
Chen, the suggestion is not for you to take July to complete your
release. If you told me you had cancelled the proposed release and were
working on migrating to open development at Apache, I might be prepared
to pause a month. Your comment only makes me feel inclined not to wait.
If you want to
33 matches
Mail list logo
