Chen, the suggestion is not for you to take July to complete your
release. If you told me you had cancelled the proposed release and were
working on migrating to open development at Apache, I might be prepared
to pause a month. Your comment only makes me feel inclined not to wait.
If you want to u
+1 (non-binding)
Looking at the (lack of) progress and interest, I think its time to
end incubation for Bluesky.
- Henry
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:49 PM, berndf wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling.
>
> 3.5 years into incubation, the podling has not made prog
+1 (non-binding) for the retirement proposal.
Chen, the vote has nothing to do with whether you manage to release
the 4th version or not, and the failure to see that and the failure to
understand what Apache and the incubator is about is a testament to
why the project should be retired, in my mind
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> I concur with Craig's thoughts.
>
> +1 to retire (binding).
>
+1, even with the whole discussion that there is a need for open
development right now and not in the future, the last Chen Lu messages
keeps trying to by more time with close develop
We've already known our failure in ASF. We would not
find any excuses for this bed situation.
But we just hope one more month to release the 4th version work.
We've been advancing Bluesky project and now the 4th version is an
integtared system including something about commercial.
We're aware of
I concur with Craig's thoughts.
+1 to retire (binding).
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 19:27, Craig L Russell wrote:
> +1 for retiring Bluesky
>
> I believe that the Bluesky project is well-intentioned but just doesn't
> belong at Apache.
>
> The coders do not use mail lists for discussions of design,
We're preparing for the 4th version release.
We need the whole July to do this work,thanks for your patience.
2011/7/2 Upayavira
> I would support a one month wait. No more. They've had a long time. One
> month is long enough to show seriousness. With no movement in that time,
> a swift vote can
+1 for retiring Bluesky
I believe that the Bluesky project is well-intentioned but just
doesn't belong at Apache.
The coders do not use mail lists for discussions of design, code,
infrastructure, or other aspects of project management that Apache
projects must do. "If it didn't happen on
+1 (Binding)
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> +1 to retire Bluesky (binding)
>
> I see no reason for suspending the vote. We've been round this
> particular merry-go-round many times already. Each time we're told
> "we'll do better". The votes been called lets just move on, t
+1 to retire Bluesky (binding)
I see no reason for suspending the vote. We've been round this
particular merry-go-round many times already. Each time we're told
"we'll do better". The votes been called lets just move on, the ASF is
not the right home for this project for the reasons already discus
The vote does not need to be suspended. It perhaps would be enough to
leave the vote open for a month. If there is at least one -1 by then the
podling might continue to exist, otherwise it is retired.
My non-binding vote on retirement:
+1
Cheers,
Andreas
---
Am 01.07.2011 23:28, schrieb Upayavir
Hi Hen,
> To confirm, will you be doing the following steps:
>
> * Investigate whether the source was covered by CLAs.
> * If so then update the web page before moving to retired.
> * Otherwise delete the source from svn.
Yes, i noted that and will care on it.
Do you have any tipps how I can mak
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> I would support a one month wait. No more. They've had a long time. One
> month is long enough to show seriousness. With no movement in that time,
> a swift vote can close the project down.
+1
Christian
> Upayavira
>
> On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:3
I would support a one month wait. No more. They've had a long time. One
month is long enough to show seriousness. With no movement in that time,
a swift vote can close the project down.
Upayavira
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:36 -0400, "Noel J. Bergman"
wrote:
> Bill Stoddard wrote:
>
> > I would like
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> Are we to keep on creating new committer accts for these folks knowing damn
> well
> that at the end of the term they disappear and a new lot appears? This is why
> they (
> when they did commit) shared accounts.
What if the students all s
On Jul 1, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net]
>> Sent: Saturday, 2 July 2011 1:24 AM
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Bluesky calls for a new mentor!
>>
>> On 7/1/2011 10:19 AM, L
> -Original Message-
> From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net]
> Sent: Saturday, 2 July 2011 1:24 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Bluesky calls for a new mentor!
>
> On 7/1/2011 10:19 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Benso
Due to career changes I'm going to have a lot less time for open
source activities, even less than the paltry time I have now for
monitoring mailing lists and helping out. Please accept this as my
resignation from the Jena and JSPWiki podlings.
- Dave
-
+1
Doug
On 06/29/2011 12:10 PM, Mohammad Islam wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The discussion about Oozie proposal is settling down. Therefore I would like
> to
> initiate a vote to accept Oozie as an Apache Incubator project.
>
> The latest proposal is pasted at the end and it could be found in the wik
Hi all,
The Apache Hama community voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Hama 0.3-incubating (RC2). This release contains performance
improvements and new features e.g., maven build, web UI for Hama
cluster, MessageBundle, Dijkstra's Shortest Path and PageRank
examples.
Please vote on
On 7/1/2011 10:19 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> Based on the email trail recently, I'm in favor of completing the
>> vote. I think that there is sufficient evidence that this project has
>> 'failed to launch' as an Apache community, and
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Based on the email trail recently, I'm in favor of completing the
> vote. I think that there is sufficient evidence that this project has
> 'failed to launch' as an Apache community, and should go put itself on
> github. If enough people di
This reflects my sentiments as well.
Regards,
Alan
On Jul 1, 2011, at 7:49 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Based on the email trail recently, I'm in favor of completing the
> vote. I think that there is sufficient evidence that this project has
> 'failed to launch' as an Apache community, and s
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Rob Weir wrote:
We continue to discuss moving this work to Apache. Feedback so far has
been to try for an eventual TLP. We're starting to draft the Incubation
proposal. We talked to the maintainer of the C#/AODL component and he
confirmed that it is not really active anym
Based on the email trail recently, I'm in favor of completing the
vote. I think that there is sufficient evidence that this project has
'failed to launch' as an Apache community, and should go put itself on
github. If enough people disagree, they can vote -1.
My vote is +1 to retire.
On Fri, Jul
We continue to discuss moving this work to Apache. Feedback so far
has been to try for an eventual TLP. We're starting to draft the
Incubation proposal. We talked to the maintainer of the C#/AODL
component and he confirmed that it is not really active anymore. He
might move it to bitbucket. So
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Mohammad Islam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose Oozie to be an Apache Incubator project.
> Oozie is a server-based workflow scheduling and coordination system to
> manage
> data processing jobs for Apache Hadoop.
>
>
> Here's a link to t
Bill Stoddard wrote:
> I would like to see this vote suspended until we can get some feedback
> from Jack Cai re whether he is willing to be a mentor.
I concur that we should suspend this vote pending the outcome of the
project's attempt to reboot.
--- Noel
---
I would like to see this vote suspended until we can get some feedback
from Jack Cai re whether he is willing to be a mentor.
Bill
On 6/28/11 1:49 AM, berndf wrote:
Hi everyone,
this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling.
3.5 years into incubation, the podling has not made progress in term
I am not certain on this point, but I believe Jack Cai would be
interested in being a mentor. I don't think he is subscribed to this
mailing list tho.
Jack?
Bill
On 6/29/11 9:12 PM, Chen Liu wrote:
Hi,all,
Now, Bluesky project calls for a new mentor to guide us to complete the
release work
> -Original Message-
> From: Edward J. Yoon [mailto:edwardy...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, 1 July 2011 6:38 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Blogs for incubator projects?
>
> Hi,
>
> We are currently uses Apache Blogs for Hama-incubating project.
>
> You can request
Hi,
We are currently uses Apache Blogs for Hama-incubating project.
You can request it on infrastructure@ list.
Thanks.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> What is the best approach for setting up a project blog for incubator
> projects?
>
> For TLPs we have
>
Hi folks!
What is the best approach for setting up a project blog for incubator projects?
For TLPs we have
http://blogs.apache.org/
Should I ask for a section for Isis over there, or do we maintain a separated
incubator blog area somewhere?
txs and LieGrue,
strub
+1
Tom
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Mohammad Islam wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The discussion about Oozie proposal is settling down. Therefore I would like
> to
> initiate a vote to accept Oozie as an Apache Incubator project.
>
> The latest proposal is pasted at the end and it could be found in t
34 matches
Mail list logo
