Re: [PROPOSAL] Proposing Giraph for the Apache Incubator

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Avery Ching ach...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: Hi, I would like to propose Giraph as an Apache Incubator project. Obviously, I'm +1 for this. *smile* -- Owen

*** Missing reports - POST IMMEDIATELY!

OGNL, Olio (2 cycles in a row), Rave, VXQuery (also two cycles in a row) are all missing. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: *** Missing reports - POST IMMEDIATELY!

VXQuery is in now. Sorry, Till On Jul 18, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: OGNL, Olio (2 cycles in a row), Rave, VXQuery (also two cycles in a row) are all missing. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Retire Olio?

I see no development in 18 months. Is it time to terminate? --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Proposing Giraph for the Apache Incubator

Cool. I've added myself to the list of Initial Committers on the wiki. (As I understand it, during the proposal phase of an incubator project, anyone can jump in and volunteer to be a committer. But if anyone wants to know more about me or my background, feel free to ask). Phil On Sun, Jul

[IP CLEARANCE] Apache PDFBox PDF/A Preflight

Hi, the Apache PDFBox project has received a contribution of a PDFBox-based PDF/A-Preflight implementation. * The code is attached to the PDFBOX-1056 JIRA issue [1] * The IP Clearance form has been committed to the Incubator website. [2] * A vote has passed on the dev@pdfbox mailing list [3]

SGA for AL 2.0 licensed code base

I'm just curious. Do we still need an SGA for a podling codebase that's AL 2.0 licensed? Regards, Alan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: SGA for AL 2.0 licensed code base

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: I'm just curious.  Do we still need an SGA for a podling codebase that's AL 2.0 licensed? Do we know that the people who placed the AL 2.0 license headers on that code have sufficient rights to do so? A signed

[VOTE] RC3 for Hama 0.3-incubating.

Hi all, Please vote on the RC3 for Apache Hama 0.3-Incubating. We've already received 2 binding IPMC +1 votes. Vote thread: http://markmail.org/thread/eaypivg3r5wdx36y Artifact and signatures: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.3.0-RC3/ SVN Tag:

Re: SGA for AL 2.0 licensed code base

+1 The main thing is that Apache must be able to rely upon the license contained in the files. This is the same reason that we don't routinely accept contributions that are licensed in the public domain. Just because a file says it has a particular license doesn't mean that the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Proposing Giraph for the Apache Incubator

I have experiences about graph processing as follows: * RDF pattern matching and storage system on HBase * some types of graph counting * subgraph isomorphism on large graph data with MapReduce (I'm writing a research paper on this) * all pairs of shortest paths with CUDA I have just added myself

Re: Retire Olio?

Perhaps. But the project is still useful and I see researchers using it (the activity usually picks up during the summer months). If we can arrange for the project to be still easily available i.e. downloadable binary kits + svn access that would be ideal. Shanti On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:31

Re: [VOTE] RC3 for Hama 0.3-incubating.

[x] +1 Release the packages as Apache Hama 0.3-incubating On 19/07/11 02:10, Edward J. Yoon wrote: Hi all, Please vote on the RC3 for Apache Hama 0.3-Incubating. We've already received 2 binding IPMC +1 votes. Vote thread: http://markmail.org/thread/eaypivg3r5wdx36y Artifact and signatures: