OGNL, Olio (2 cycles in a row), Rave, VXQuery (also two cycles in a row) are
all missing.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubat
VXQuery is in now.
Sorry,
Till
On Jul 18, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> OGNL, Olio (2 cycles in a row), Rave, VXQuery (also two cycles in a row) are
> all missing.
>
> --- Noel
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe,
I see no development in 18 months. Is it time to terminate?
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Cool. I've added myself to the list of "Initial Committers" on the wiki.
(As I understand it, during the proposal
phase of an incubator project, anyone can jump in and volunteer to be a
committer. But if anyone wants to know
more about me or my background, feel free to ask).
Phil
On Sun, Jul
Hi,
the Apache PDFBox project has received a contribution of a PDFBox-based
PDF/A-Preflight implementation.
* The code is attached to the PDFBOX-1056 JIRA issue [1]
* The IP Clearance form has been committed to the Incubator website. [2]
* A vote has passed on the dev@pdfbox mailing list [3]
I'm just curious. Do we still need an SGA for a podling codebase that's AL 2.0
licensed?
Regards,
Alan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> I'm just curious. Do we still need an SGA for a podling codebase that's AL
> 2.0 licensed?
Do we know that the people who placed the AL 2.0 license headers on
that code have sufficient rights to do so? A signed statement that
"Licensor
Hi all,
Please vote on the RC3 for Apache Hama 0.3-Incubating. We've already
received 2 binding IPMC +1 votes.
Vote thread:
http://markmail.org/thread/eaypivg3r5wdx36y
Artifact and signatures:
http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.3.0-RC3/
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubat
+1
The main thing is that Apache must be able to rely upon the license
contained in the files.
This is the same reason that we don't routinely accept contributions
that are licensed "in the public domain".
Just because a file says it has a particular license doesn't mean that
the contri
I have experiences about graph processing as follows:
* RDF pattern matching and storage system on HBase
* some types of graph counting
* subgraph isomorphism on large graph data with MapReduce (I'm writing a
research paper on this)
* all pairs of shortest paths with CUDA
I have just added myself
Perhaps. But the project is still useful and I see researchers using it (the
activity usually picks up during the summer months). If we can arrange for
the project to be still easily available i.e. downloadable binary kits + svn
access that would be ideal.
Shanti
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:31 AM,
[x] +1 Release the packages as Apache Hama 0.3-incubating
On 19/07/11 02:10, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
Hi all,
Please vote on the RC3 for Apache Hama 0.3-Incubating. We've already
received 2 binding IPMC +1 votes.
Vote thread:
http://markmail.org/thread/eaypivg3r5wdx36y
Artifact and signatures:
h
(dropping bluesky-dev)
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Bernd Fondermann
wrote:
> ...The vote to retire Bluesky succeeds...
Is anyone taking care of cleaning up BlueSky, deleting code from svn
(I assume that's needed), closing mailing lists etc?
-Bertrand
---
13 matches
Mail list logo