Hi,
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a list of the projects in the Incubator who need to sign off
their copyright item; namely:
...
2009-12-15 clerezza
...
Checked and we do have a grant at
documents/grants/trialox-clerezza.pdf,
Tags are supposed to be immutable.
For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
when the vote succeeds.
Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
[BTW, the new tar file format reads
On Aug 21, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Etch and Tashi are signed off.
Droids (seems the easiest one to sign off on) and Olio (likely to be
retired) left from 2008 inductees.
2009 list remains unchanged from below.
Wink is on my ToDo list. Just need a bit of free time...
Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
A.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Tags are supposed to be immutable.
For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Andrew Bayer andrew.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
A.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Tags are supposed to
fwiw, in this case, we weren't releasing via Maven, so there wasn't a
technical reason to reuse the tag.
And yeah, sorry, this is my first ever ASF release, and our mentors
suggested we try releasing in order to find out what needed to be fixed for
the release. =)
A.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at
This is the first incubator release for Apache Wookie, with the artifacts being
versioned as 0.9.0-incubating.
We have already received 2 IPMC +1 votes (plus an additional 3 PPMC +1 votes)
during the release voting on wookie-dev.
Vote thread:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Andrew Bayer andrew.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
fwiw, in this case, we weren't releasing via Maven, so there wasn't a
technical reason to reuse the tag.
And yeah, sorry, this is my first ever ASF release, and our mentors
suggested we try releasing in order to find
On 22 August 2011 16:56, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Andrew Bayer andrew.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
A.
On Mon, Aug
This thread has got rather long and complicated.
May I suggest creating a new thread (i.e. not a reply) with just the
details required for the new vote?
Change the subject to include RC2 please.
Thanks!
On 22 August 2011 16:26, Andrew Bayer andrew.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
Whoops. Sorry about
Was actually doing that as you wrote this. =)
A.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:03 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
This thread has got rather long and complicated.
May I suggest creating a new thread (i.e. not a reply) with just the
details required for the new vote?
Change the subject to
This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
0.1.0-incubating.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549styleName=HtmlprojectId=12311420
*** Please download, test, and vote by Thursday, August 24 (3 working days
from
...and I should add that I'm, again, +1 binding. =)
A.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Andrew Bayer andrew.ba...@gmail.comwrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
0.1.0-incubating.
It fixes the following issues:
On 22 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer andrew.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
...and I should add that I'm, again, +1 binding. =)
AIUI that's only binding as far as the Bigtop PPMC (podling PMC) is concerned.
You don't seem to be on the Incubator PMC, which is what is required
for binding votes on a
On 22 August 2011 19:07, Andrew Bayer andrew.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
0.1.0-incubating.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549styleName=HtmlprojectId=12311420
***
blergh, sorry about the date and the DISCLAIMER text. Fixing the DISCLAIMER
on trunk now. I've also done BIGTOP-26 on trunk. I'm honestly not sure about
the filter files - will check on that going forward.
A.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:30 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 August 2011
Entries in podling juice not in incubator group:
amattheu,kwouters,nlevitt,raul,vdkoogh,wassa,werner
Could one of the PMC chairs please add them as follows:
$ modify_unix_group.pl incubator
-add=amattheu,kwouters,nlevitt,raul,vdkoogh,wassa,werner
Thanks
-1 non-binding, the package generation spec file are currently producing
package name without reference to bigtop. The resulting artifacts can
potentially overlap with project produced artifacts.
regards,
Eric
On Aug 22, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
This is the first incubator
Given that we're not releasing binary convenience artifacts for this
release, would this be something that could be fixed in 0.2.0-incubating
rather than this release?
A.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Eric Yang ey...@hortonworks.com wrote:
-1 non-binding, the package generation spec file
I would view this as an experiment.
Granting all podling committers access to the entire incubator seems a
bit overbroad.
Craig
On Aug 22, 2011, at 12:53 PM, danie...@apache.org wrote:
Author: danielsh
Date: Mon Aug 22 19:53:21 2011
New Revision: 794749
Log:
open /incubator to incubator
+1 Non-binding. I appreciate Eric's concerns, but we are releasing
Bigtop project here,
not the artifacts it is capable of producing. That said, settling on
an appropriate (and
configurable!) naming convention for packages would be a really high priority
for us in coming weeks.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Bruno Mahé bm...@apache.org wrote:
imho this is a non issue for this release because:
* A discussion has just started on bigtop-dev mailing list about that
question.
For the benefit of those exclusively on general@incubator.apache.org: the thread
that Bruno
You seem to have a pom.xml but if I understood correctly you're not
using maven for releasing. In case you are this might be useful:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/empiredb/Release+Process
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Andrew Bayer andrew.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
Was actually doing
Hi -
The POM is actually just for site generation currently. In the next release,
we'll probably have Maven artifacts to release as well, though.
A.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Francis De Brabandere
franci...@gmail.comwrote:
You seem to have a pom.xml but if I understood correctly you're
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:32:10AM -0700, Henri Yandell wrote:
Btw, the work is a search and replace on the body... tag. I
generally find one that works on the site content but fails on javadoc
(as inserting a header into a frame system is painful).
I'm glad to hear that munging a TLP website
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:26:24AM +0200, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Another option which might be cleaner and less burdensome to administer
would
be to create a boilerplate Retired Podling static html page which would
replace the website for any podling which does not graduate. This
This is the first incubator release for Apache Whirr, version 0.6.0-incubating
and the last release as an incubator project.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1230version=12316468
*** Please download, test and vote by August 26,
27 matches
Mail list logo
