Hi all,
please review and vote on approving the release of Apache OpenNLP.
OpenNLP is a machine learning based toolkit for the processing of
natural language text.
It supports the most common NLP tasks, such as tokenization, sentence
segmentation,
part-of-speech tagging, named entity
This VOTE has failed due to incomplete LICENSE files.
On 04/11/2011 16:11, Paul Sharples wrote:
This is the second incubator release for Apache Wookie, with the
artifacts being versioned as 0.9.1-incubating.
We have already received 2 IPMC +1 votes (plus an additional 3 PPMC +1
votes) during
+1 (binding)
Tommaso
2011/11/7 Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com
Hi all,
please review and vote on approving the release of Apache OpenNLP.
OpenNLP is a machine learning based toolkit for the processing of natural
language text.
It supports the most common NLP tasks, such as tokenization,
On 7 November 2011 09:30, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
please review and vote on approving the release of Apache OpenNLP.
OpenNLP is a machine learning based toolkit for the processing of natural
language text.
It supports the most common NLP tasks, such as tokenization,
On 11/7/11 3:29 PM, sebb wrote:
On 7 November 2011 09:30, Jörn Kottmannkottm...@gmail.com wrote:
Where is the SVN tag?
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/opennlp/tags/opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc4/
The KEYS file?
On 7 November 2011 14:48, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/7/11 3:29 PM, sebb wrote:
On 7 November 2011 09:30, Jörn Kottmannkottm...@gmail.com wrote:
Where is the SVN tag?
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/opennlp/tags/opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc4/
The KEYS file?
I agree with sebb about UIMA and notices. Sorry not to have been
paying attention when this came up before.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:45 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 November 2011 14:48, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/7/11 3:29 PM, sebb wrote:
On 7 November 2011 09:30,
Links to both should be provided in the VOTE e-mails please.
The NOTICE file in the binary zip contains the following paragraph:
This product depends on Apache UIMA developed at
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/), licensed
under the Apache License 2.0 (see LICENSE file).
+1 (ipmc binding)
verified the checks/sigs, rat looks good and was able to build the ZK
deb pkg successfully.
note: it would be nice if at the end of the make zookeeper-deb
(etc...) some indication of success/failure was indicated. Also some
information on what was built and where it was output
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
You might consider this nit-picking but it might also be important at
some point in the future.
You use the phrase committ rights in this template. They are not
rights they are privileges. The reason this might be
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
You use the phrase committ rights in this template. They are not
rights they are privileges. The reason this might be important is
that very occasionally it is necessary for a PMC to remove these
privileges, it is
On 7 November 2011 18:15, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com wrote:
Links to both should be provided in the VOTE e-mails please.
The NOTICE file in the binary zip contains the following paragraph:
This product depends on Apache UIMA developed at
The Apache Software Foundation
Hello everyone,
the vote is cancelled. We already addressed all the issues mentioned by Sebb
and will soon prepare the next release candidate. Thanks for the review.
Jörn
On 11/7/11 10:30 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Hi all,
please review and vote on approving the release of Apache OpenNLP.
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of
developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following incubation. They
even went an extra mile and collected all ICLAs in adbvance.
So
On 7 November 2011 14:11, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com
wrote:
...
That being said, thank you for improving this template, I've added
your enhancements to the original template over at ComDev (along with
the
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of
developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to
16 matches
Mail list logo
