On Dec 18, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
On Dec 17, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I think the Board might have an issue with the 'purpose' of the
project (I would if I was in the Board). The formulation
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation
First and foremost, thank you for providing comments, opinions and
insight on how we can all make Gora a better project @ ASF.
At this stage a change to either documentation or an opinion regarding
Apache Gora is fine, however I propose that as a community we were
should address the obvious
Hey Marcel,
Thanks for your feedback. Comments below:
On Dec 18, 2011, at 3:28 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
On Dec 18, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
On Dec 17, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I think the Board might have an issue with the 'purpose' of the
project
On Dec 18, 2011, at 18:15 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
On Dec 18, 2011, at 3:28 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
On Dec 18, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
On Dec 17, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I think the Board might have an issue with the 'purpose' of the
Hey Marcel,
On Dec 18, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
In my view, ORM is middeware, but not all middleware is ORM. That's why I see
it as an extension. More precise, you do state it's not just middleware, but
persistence, storage and retrieval middleware, but even that in my
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
Bean Validation, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it
is time or not, [1], [2] and [3].
In the past few weeks there has been a [VOTE], [4], which formally
discussed the graduation to a TLP project.
Sorry, please ignore this one, I clicked send by mistake :(. Will send the
complete one later.
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
Bean Validation, whether to graduate to a
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote on Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:15:28 -0800:
On Dec 18, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
and, IF it somehow requires Hadoop (see question above) that
definition should probably be extended with something like for
Hadoop.
It doesn't require it, so maybe
+1
However, somehow my mail is wrong, should be pa...@apache.org and
_not_ kpa...@apache.org
regards,
Karl
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Marcel Offermans
marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
Hello all,
As the discussion about the resolution [1] offered no further feedback, it is
time
