+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://wwx.talend.com
- Reply message -
From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache BVal as a TLP
Date: Thu, Feb 9, 2012 1:02
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor
issues (like Stanbol needing an intro paragraph). I also pinged
NPanday and Zeta Components that have still not reported (both also
missed their
Hi Folks,
OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC
chair and it looks like the remaining folks (including me) that were in the
running
have aligned beyond the following nominee: Jukka Zitting. Suffice to say, he
was
*my first choice* :)
In the interest of
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Folks,
OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC
chair and it looks like the remaining folks (including me) that were in the
running
have aligned
+1 (binding)
Tommaso
2012/2/9 Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
Hi Folks,
OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC
chair and it looks like the remaining folks (including me) that were in
the running
have aligned beyond the following
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Sam suggested asking prodlings in category 2 to report back again next
month on their progress towards solving the mentioned issues.
Hey, now don't go and start spreading false rumors here. Particularly
as the
+1 (binding)
Ralph
On Feb 9, 2012, at 7:16 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Folks,
OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC
chair and it looks like the remaining folks (including me) that were in the
running
have
+1 binding.
Thanks for putting up this vote Chris
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Folks,
OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC
chair and it looks like the remaining folks (including me) that
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 02/09/2012 04:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Folks,
OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC
chair and it looks like the remaining folks (including me) that were in the
running
have aligned beyond the following nominee: Jukka
Hi Folks,
So here's what I personally am going to do to help move forward here
in the Incubator:
1. called VOTE for Jukka Zitting as chair. Seems at least for now, we need
a new chair, and we've discussed it enough, so there you have it.
2. I wrote an Incubator deconstruction proposal here:
+1 (binding)
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Folks,
OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC
chair and it looks like the remaining folks
I'm ready to vote, but Chris said it looks like the remaining folks
(including me) that were in the running have aligned beyond the
following nominee: Where is the mail from Noel saying he is no longer
standing? Have I missed something?
Ross
On 9 February 2012 15:39, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu
+1 (binding)
Karl Wright
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Folks,
OK there
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
[ ] +1 Recommend Jukka Zitting for the IPMC chair position.
+1 Greg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Sam suggested asking prodlings in category 2 to report back again next
month on their progress towards solving the mentioned issues.
Hey,
Hi Ross,
Sorry, I didn't see a mail from Noel, but he's already the chair.
If this VOTE isn't successful, then he'll remain the chair. If
you want to explicitly call a VOTE for Noel, go ahead, but
this is the VOTE I am interested in calling, thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On Feb 9, 2012, at 7:50 AM,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
By July we should then have a
pretty accurate record of progress throughout the entire Incubator,
including a clear list of podlings that are stuck and need help.
+1
- Sam Ruby
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Paul
On Feb 9, 2012, at 7:16 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Folks,
OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC
chair and it looks like the remaining folks (including me) that were in the
running
have aligned beyond the
On Feb 9, 2012, at 17:10 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 7:04 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Ross,
Sorry, I didn't see a mail from Noel, but he's already the chair.
If this VOTE isn't successful, then he'll remain the chair. If
you want to explicitly call a VOTE
On 9 February 2012 16:32, Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 17:10 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 7:04 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Ross,
Sorry, I didn't see a mail from Noel, but he's already the chair.
If this VOTE isn't
On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Well, if there's an election, the fair thing is to include all candidates and
see who gets the majority. A vote on just one candidate is odd.
Agreed.
I suggest that this VOTE be withdrawn, and a true election,
with all candidates be
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
...I suggest that this VOTE be withdrawn, and a true election,
with all candidates be done...
Agreed - I think Chris assumed there was only one candidate, but it's
just an assumption AFAICS.
-Bertrand
On Feb 9, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Well, if there's an election, the fair thing is to include all candidates
and see who gets the majority. A vote on just one candidate is odd.
Agreed.
I suggest that this VOTE be
On 02/09/2012 05:54 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Jim Jagielskij...@jagunet.com wrote:
...I suggest that this VOTE be withdrawn, and a true election,
with all candidates be done...
Agreed - I think Chris assumed there was only one candidate, but it's
just an
On Feb 9, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 02/09/2012 05:58 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Well, if there's an election, the fair thing is to include all candidates
and see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Franklin resolved PODLINGNAMESEARCH-5.
---
Resolution: Fixed
After examination of the results of this search
On 9 February 2012 17:11, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 02/09/2012 05:58 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
On 2/9/2012 10:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Well, if there's an election, the fair thing is to include all candidates
and see who gets the majority. A vote on just one candidate is odd.
Agreed.
I suggest that this VOTE be
I have observations
(1) Why is the IPMC different from other PMCs and holding a personnel VOTEs on
a public ML?
(2) Why is there such a hurry to call a [VOTE] without a prior [DISCUSS]?
(3) Why can't Chris start new threads by using New Message rather than a reply
to a prior thread with a
On 2/9/2012 11:29 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
(1) Why is the IPMC different from other PMCs and holding a personnel VOTEs
on a public ML?
Just to clarify this single issue; by rights, adding committers and
committee members is a personal issue about those individuals. But
choosing a
On 02/09/2012 07:42 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
2. I wrote an Incubator deconstruction proposal here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorDeconstructionProposal
I still wholly believe in the proposal and that it should be implemented.
It contains a series of (potentially
Imo it's always good to have a few pair of (active!) eyes having oversight.
It's just simply too easy to miss something important - even for a long-time
committed mentor.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
+1 (binding)
From my perspective, Chris's proposal and Benson's vote above
effectively turned this into a single issue question: is now the time
for Noah to be replaced by Jukka?
There are no question
+1 for Jukka
As Sam said, the others are good candidates as well and Noel also did a
wonderful job all the years.
I expect that Jukka follows in his foot steps - maybe with a slight bit more
presence ;)
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
To:
+1
Doug
On 02/09/2012 07:16 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Folks,
OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC
chair and it looks like the remaining folks (including me) that were in the
running
have aligned beyond the following nominee: Jukka
On 02/09/2012 08:39 AM, sebb wrote:
In case it's not obvious, I agree with Ross, Andrus and Marcel - I
think the current VOTE thread is invalid and should be cancelled.
I don't see how it is invalid. Chris might have added more choices or
invited more discussion first, but he can call a vote.
On Feb 9, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 (binding)
+1 (binding)
From my perspective, Chris's proposal and Benson's vote above
effectively turned this into a single issue question: is now the time
for
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Feb 9, 2012 7:27 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/09/2012 08:39 AM, sebb wrote:
In case it's not obvious, I agree with Ross, Andrus and Marcel - I
think the current VOTE thread is invalid and should be
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 (binding)
+1 (binding)
From my perspective, Chris's proposal and Benson's vote above
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 (binding)
+1 (binding)
From my perspective, Chris's proposal and Benson's vote above
Martijn Dashorst wrote on Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 22:19:45 +0100:
- Project website has been created
- Project website complies with trademarks@ guidelines
(Did you copy your list from somewhere? If so, I'll add that bullet
to it.)
+1
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Ross Gardler wrote:
I'm ready to vote, but Chris said it looks like the remaining folks
(including me) that were in the running have aligned beyond the
following nominee: Where is the mail from Noel saying he is no longer
standing? Have I missed something?
There wasn't one. I was traveling
+1 to Jukka. Many Many Thanks to Noel for guiding us all these years.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
I'm ready to vote, but Chris said it looks like the remaining folks
(including me) that were in the running have aligned beyond the
+1 to Jukka Zitting! (non-binding)
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to Jukka. Many Many Thanks to Noel for guiding us all these years.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
I'm ready to vote,
Thanks Craig. :)
regards,
Eric
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Craig L Russell
craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Eric,
This request was completed on January 20 based on your request.
Craig
On Feb 7, 2012, at 9:59 PM, Eric Yang wrote:
Hi Richard,
The result thread was sent to
With Noel's email, this vote makes sense now.
+1 to Jukka (binding)
Cheers,
Andrus
On Feb 9, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Folks,
OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC
chair and it looks like the remaining folks (including me)
Thank you Noel.
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Feb 10, 2012 2:32 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
I'm ready to vote, but Chris said it looks like the remaining folks
(including me) that were in the running have aligned
+1
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Feb 9, 2012 3:17 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Folks,
OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC
chair and it looks like the remaining folks (including
49 matches
Mail list logo
