El 29/03/2012 17:25, Juan C. Sanz escribió:
El 29/03/2012 17:09, Ariel Constenla-Haile escribió:
Hola *,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:57:26PM +0200, Juan C. Sanz wrote:
Bueno, no es que yo la haya terminado, es para avisaros por si no os
habeis dado cuenta que han actualizado algo, y ahora la
Por el momento, AOO 3.4 en Español solo tendrá el diccionario Español
preinstalado. Antiguamente en OOo se distribuían también los
diccionarios de inglés y francés por lo que la pregunta es la
siguiente: ¿queremos más diccionarios que el español preinstalados?
Mi tendencia es a decir que no: una
- Mensaje original -
De: Ariel Constenla-Haile
Enviado: 29-03-12 09:09
Para: ooo-general-es@incubator.apache.org
Asunto: [TADUCCION] Build para QA de la traducción (era: Terminada la
traducción de la ayuda)
Hola *, Una pequeña encuesta necesaria: ¿qué sistema operativo y arquitectura
- Mensaje original -
De: RGB ES
Enviado: 29-03-12 15:16
Para: ooo-general-es@incubator.apache.org
Asunto: [Diccionarios]¿Incluir otros idiomas?
Por el momento, AOO 3.4 en Español solo tendrá el diccionario Español
preinstalado. Antiguamente en OOo se distribuían también los diccionarios
On 3/28/12 9:22 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
2012/3/28 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@googlemail.com:
On 3/28/12 12:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
It is more or less a pure svn dump.
Right -- just with a few files moved around and a bunch filtered out.
yes, we build the src release package as
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
Shipping a set of CDDL jars out of some java.net projects that oracle
has all but abandoned is far beyond my imagined threshold of
reasonable on the scale. Do you actually see that differently?
Agreed. These are exactly
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
...It seems like Roy is much more categorical about this. Assuming I
understand his point correctly, *no* binary dependencies are
acceptable within a source tarball.
What I don't quite (yet) understand is how a
I mentioned this in another note but I'll repeat here to use your example.
Where the binaries do live in a Maven repo and are versioned there is less of
an issue and it becomes a convenience. A real challenge is what to do if your
taking a stable copy of a project that doesn't have a
Jukka Zitting wrote on Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 14:41:02 +0200:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
Shipping a set of CDDL jars out of some java.net projects that oracle
has all but abandoned is far beyond my imagined threshold of
reasonable on the
Hi,
Am 26. März 2012 17:20 schrieb Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com:
On Mar 26, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:24 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 March 2012 02:38, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
The LICENSE file includes references to
On Mar 29, 2012, at 15:07 , Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
...It seems like Roy is much more categorical about this. Assuming I
understand his point correctly, *no* binary dependencies are
acceptable within a source
Le 3/29/12 3:41 PM, Daniel Shahaf a écrit :
Jukka Zitting wrote on Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 14:41:02 +0200:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Leo Simonsm...@leosimons.com wrote:
Shipping a set of CDDL jars out of some java.net projects that oracle
has all but abandoned is far beyond my
On 29 March 2012 15:09, Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
On Mar 29, 2012, at 15:07 , Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
...It seems like Roy is much more categorical about this. Assuming I
understand his
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Fabian Christ
christ.fab...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 26. März 2012 17:20 schrieb Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com:
On Mar 26, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:24 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 March 2012 02:38, Shinichiro
On Mar 29, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Fabian Christ wrote:
Hi,
Am 26. März 2012 17:20 schrieb Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com:
On Mar 26, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:24 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 March 2012 02:38, Shinichiro Abe
On Mar 29, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Personally, I agree with Roy. Perhaps it might seem a little odd to include
the text of e.g. the GPLv2 in one of our LICENSE files (alongside a more
permissive license), but the key here is that it is both legally OK for us to
distribute a
On 29 March 2012 18:43, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
On Mar 29, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Personally, I agree with Roy. Perhaps it might seem a little odd to include
the text of e.g. the GPLv2 in one of our LICENSE files (alongside a more
permissive license), but
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:42 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2012 18:43, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
I prefer to put our license in the file and then, at the bottom, refer
to a list of other licenses per dependency (if included in this package),
wherein the
Clutch also has a list of Other Issues:
http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#other
It is mainly where Clutch is trying to help with
the post-graduation steps. There are some other things
listed for current incubation podlings.
Sure, some of these items are where projects have
recently
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
On Mar 29, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Fabian Christ wrote:
I am following all these discussions for doing a first release of
Apache Stanbol (incubating) but get totally confused. According to
On Mar 29, 2012, at 9:37 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:42 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2012 18:43, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
I prefer to put our license in the file and then, at the bottom, refer
to a list of other licenses per
21 matches
Mail list logo
