What happened to all the podling sites?

2012-04-09 Thread Karl Wright
I happened to notice that a site publish I'd done a week ago did not actually update our podling site. Publishing is done in accordance with [1]. The problem seems to be that someone has wiped out /www/incubator.apache.org/ except for the content directory, which is meant solely for the

Re: What happened to all the podling sites?

2012-04-09 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: I happened to notice that a site publish I'd done a week ago did not actually update our podling site.  Publishing is done in accordance with [1]. See http://markmail.org/message/qwsxbemalubrqhft for the update

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.9.0-incubating (RC4)

2012-04-09 Thread Benjamin Hindman
Hi Sebb, Thanks so much for taking a look! Responses inline. On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 2:22 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 April 2012 02:59, Benjamin Hindman b...@berkeley.edu wrote: Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos (incubating) version 0.9.0. This will

Adding branding items to graduation requirements

2012-04-09 Thread Shane Curcuru
How can we best add the requirement that all podlings must comply with the PMC branding requirements [1] before graduation? Looking over the recent Jena thread and especially incubator status page, there's no specific bullet point or checkoff that lists the PMC branding requirements. In

Re: What happened to all the podling sites?

2012-04-09 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Karl Wright wrote on Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 04:01:21 -0400: I happened to notice that a site publish I'd done a week ago did not actually update our podling site. Publishing is done in accordance with [1]. The problem seems to be that someone has wiped out /www/incubator.apache.org/ except for

Re: Adding branding items to graduation requirements

2012-04-09 Thread Andy Seaborne
P.S. Jena looks fairly good, although missing (TM) after the first use of name, and needs to tweak homepage text a little. I like their logo! Thanks for that - what are those tweaks (either email or JIRA) and we'll get them fixed. Andy

Re: [IMPC] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Jena as a Top Level Project

2012-04-09 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
+1 Hadrian On 04/02/2012 05:10 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: This is a call for vote to graduate the Apache Jena podling from Apache Incubator to be a top level project. Jena entered incubation in November 2010. The project has added two new committers and PPMC members, made several releases and

Re: What happened to all the podling sites?

2012-04-09 Thread Karl Wright
Sorry to be thick - but (to Jukka) just adding content to the path does not work (because the root directory /www/incubator.apache.org/content/manifoldcf still needs to be created by someone with privs greater than I've got), and (to Daniel) your instructions are too incomplete to follow. The

Re: What happened to all the podling sites?

2012-04-09 Thread Joe Schaefer
Done, but this is likely the LAST TIME we will accommodate ANY sitesthat aren't using at least svnpubsub. - Original Message - From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com To: Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name Cc: general@incubator.apache.org; infrastruct...@apache.org Sent: Monday,

Re: What happened to all the podling sites?

2012-04-09 Thread Karl Wright
Thanks for the help. We may migrate to svnpubsub in the not-distant future, especially if that is the standard for TLP's. But this would not be the right time to do that, I'm afraid. Karl On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: Done, but this is likely the

Re: What happened to all the podling sites?

2012-04-09 Thread Daniel Shahaf
So you're saying that somehow the content/manifoldcf dir was wiped out. Were any other podlings affected? Karl Wright wrote on Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 18:06:46 -0400: Thanks for the help. We may migrate to svnpubsub in the not-distant future, especially if that is the standard for TLP's. But

Re: What happened to all the podling sites?

2012-04-09 Thread Karl Wright
There was actually some confusion because the manifoldcf directory never existed. The site has been under its original name of connectors which was never changed when the project's name changed. What happened today was that I added the content directory to the path in our update script, and

[VOTE] CloudStack for Apache Incubator

2012-04-09 Thread Kevin Kluge
Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator. The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please vote with: +1: accept CloudStack into Incubator +0: don't care -1: do not accept CloudStack into Incubator (please explain the objection) The

Re: ERR 0194 ...StreamResult of target/current.ent building incubator.a.o site

2012-04-09 Thread David Crossley
Shane Curcuru wrote: Tips on building the main incubator.a.o site appreciated. There is some doc at [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html but since moving to use the Apache Content Management System (CMS) that page might need some revision. Here is how i do it: * Local checkout of

Re: ERR 0194 ...StreamResult of target/current.ent building incubator.a.o site

2012-04-09 Thread Franklin, Matthew B.
On 4/9/12 9:38 PM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote: Shane Curcuru wrote: Tips on building the main incubator.a.o site appreciated. There is some doc at [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html but since moving to use the Apache Content Management System (CMS) that page might

Re: [VOTE] CloudStack for Apache Incubator

2012-04-09 Thread Andreas Kuckartz
+1 non-binding Cheers, Andreas On 10.04.2012 03:32, Kevin Kluge wrote: Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator. The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please vote with: +1: accept CloudStack into Incubator +0: don't care

Re: [VOTE] CloudStack for Apache Incubator

2012-04-09 Thread Raymond Feng
+1 (binding). Thanks, Raymond On Apr 9, 2012, at 6:32 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote: Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator. The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please vote with: +1: accept CloudStack into Incubator +0: don't