+1 (non-binding)
-Andy Kurth
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Josh Thompson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> IPMC members,
>
> Given the positive feedback from Jukka Zitting and no negative feedback, I'd
> like to request a vote for the graduation of VCL as a TLP to b
>Hi,
>
>On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Neng Geng Huang wrote:
>> The Busilet is a reference implementation of Identifier Tracing
>> Protocol (IDTP). It is a JSON-based middleware development tool.
>
>Sounds interesting!
>
>Do you already have a Champion [1] for the project, or are you looking
>fo
PROPOSAL: Admit Allura to the Apache Incubator
= Abstract
Allura is a modular and extensible free/open source software platform for
software development. You can read more about Allura’s feature set in the
Allura wiki at https://sourceforge.net/p/allura/wiki/Features/
= Proposal
Allura is an
Any other voters?
Thanks,
Jun
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Joe Stein wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is the second candidate for the second incubator release for Apache
> Kafka, version 0.7.1-incubating.
>
> This release fixes the following issues
>
> http://people.apache.org/~joestein/kafka-0.7
Things that I've noted:
I don't see a checksum for your release in
http://people.apache.org/~joestein/kafka-0.7.1-incubating-candidate-2/ -- your
release manager will need to generate a checksum for the release.
It would be nice if your archive extracted into an
apache-kafka-0.7.1-incubating d
Couple of minor issues:
Firstly this needs to go into the incubator Wiki - done see
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AlluraProposal
Under "reliance on salaried developers" the proposal states "At
present, almost all development on Allura is done on salaried time. It
is understood that expanding t
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
>
> Under "reliance on salaried developers" the proposal states "At
> present, almost all development on Allura is done on salaried time. It
> is understood that expanding the developer community to the point
> where this is not the case, is a g
I'd like to clarify the "Current Status" section to say "Apache License
2.0" -- I didn't catch that when we were editing the initial proposal text.
But it doesn't look like I have permission to edit the wiki page. If
that's something that can be granted, my wiki username is DaveBrondsema
On Mon,
I uploaded a md5 checksum
http://people.apache.org/~joestein/kafka-0.7.1-incubating-candidate-2/ to
go along with the detached signature that was generated already
starting the kafka server is in the quick start
http://incubator.apache.org/kafka/quickstart.html
looking at Cassandra and Hadoop sou
Kevin,
Thanks for the comments. Just want to clarify on your points on
LICENSE/NOTICE. Our LICENSE/NOTICE covers all jars included in the source,
not those pulled in during building. We had a long discussion during our
1st release and in the end, we have reached the conclusion that we don't
have t
I don't think we should release as is.
- project.version is set to 0.7.0
- Have not released since the general@ threads highlighted the included
jars problem. Thanks for pointing that out Kevan.
(The unit test also don't pass for me but that could easily be a local
issue, I'll try to get a branc
Joe,
It looks like that we need to create a new RC. Could you pick up kafka-366?
It just adds a new jmx.
Thanks,
Jun
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Joe Stein wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is the second candidate for the second incubator release for Apache
> Kafka, version 0.7.1-incubating.
>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
