Hi,
Thanks for the report, OpenOffice!
After spend a few hours yesterday digging through list archives and
other materials I'm overall pretty happy with the things I'm seeing.
As also mentioned on your report, I believe you're well on your way to
establish a set of project-level bylaws or at
Hi Alexei...
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Alexei Fedotov
alexei.fedo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Mohammad, thank you for the review.
Eclipse can be considered as an alternative build system, so these files
are like build.xml files. Why not to keep them in release?
14.09.2012 3:46
On Sep 14, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Alexei Fedotov
alexei.fedo...@gmail.com wrote:
14.09.2012 3:46 пользователь Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org
написал:
One minor note:
- In [1] I noticed files related to
Hi Marcel...
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Marcel Offermans
marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
On Sep 14, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Alexei Fedotov
alexei.fedo...@gmail.com wrote:
14.09.2012 3:46 пользователь
@Mohammad: And btw, in reference to that big (blue) company, I'd say
your statement is hearsay and needs to be proofed. For instance why is
that very big (blue) company adding their own, proprietary license
header to such generated files and in one way or another even Java
files are
The more practical and pragmatic question to pose is: why would you
want to add license headers to generated files. You would have to take
care of that they won't disappear each time the file (e.g. .classpath)
is getting re-generated. Again from a practical point of view a
mentoring suggestion
Hi Daniel...
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:11 AM, dsh daniel.hais...@gmail.com wrote:
@Mohammad: And btw, in reference to that big (blue) company, I'd say
your statement is hearsay and needs to be proofed. For instance why is
that very big (blue) company adding their own, proprietary license
On Sep 14, 2012, at 5:02 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com
wrote:
But can we add ASL headers to files which are defined and considered
to be, even structure wise (please correct me if I am wrong), under
the license of Eclipse ?
If they are build artifacts (like stuff
The most useful file containing the project classpath is only formatted
automatically, it cannot be generated without project-specific knowledge.
There is no techical problem to drop these files, yet developers who
download our source release loose a useful code navigation tool without
these
Good report. Two questions/comments:
- Why not just propose the committers and see what the PPMC thinks before
holding an official vote? Is there a reason for waiting?
- The incubator status page needs to be completed. It appears that more has
happened than the page reflects.
Is there anything that could be released, even in alpha/beta form? Code
completeness or maturity is not a barrier to graduation so long as the
community can demonstrate an understanding of the Apache release process. IMO,
it is best to get early, alpha releases out on a regular basis. You
I am concerned about the level of engagement of the community. The vast
majority of mail traffic has been from automated build failures and even a
question from a potential user saw no response from the committers/PPMC.
IMHO, there needs to be a significant increase in engagement over time
-Original Message-
From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfrank...@mitre.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 11:58 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: September Reports
-Original Message-
From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September
The Apache Bloodhound (Incubating) team is pleased to announce the
availability of the Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0-incubating release.
Apache Bloodhound is a project to provide a tool to track progress and
defects in projects, with a primary focus on software projects. Standing
on the shoulders
Hi all,
After 72 hours, the vote for Crunch 0.3.0 RC1 passes with 4 IPMC +1 votes,
3 non-binding +1 votes, and no 0 or -1 votes.
+1 (IPMC/binding):
* Patrick Hunt (On crunch-dev mailing list)
* Doug Cutting
* Tom White
* Arun Murthy
+1 (non-binding):
* Josh Wills (On crunch-dev mailing list)
*
[X] +1 Graduate Bigtop podling from Apache Incubator
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
X. Establish the Apache Bigtop Project
WHEREAS, the Board of
Does anyone seriously believe that IP notices are required in files like these?
These files cannot be copyrighted because they do not have any
'creative' content. If they can't be copyrighted, they can't be
licensed. And, even it were otherwise, the notices at the top of the
tree are sufficient.
Hi Benson...
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone seriously believe that IP notices are required in files like
these?
These files cannot be copyrighted because they do not have any
'creative' content. If they can't be copyrighted, they
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org wrote:
I checked:
- Mailing lists and from it the community looks active to a good
extent both on the users and developers lists
- Last report (June 2012) they were in the 'No Release' group of
podlings but they
This is precisely what is currently being discussed. In fact, we have a
new volunteer (Angus Turner) who is helping get things in order, with
large header correcting patches.
I have been pointing out that the ability to release correctly is what
the incubator PMC wants to see, rather than a
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
I have been pointing out that the ability to release correctly is what
the incubator PMC wants to see, rather than a technically valid or
useful release. That said, a release that is full of holes might
actually have the
+1
Patrick
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
This is a call for vote to graduate Bigtop podling from Apache Incubator
The Apache Bigtop project entered incubator in June of 2011. Since then we
have grown the community in users and contributors, and
22 matches
Mail list logo
