Its good that we can help keep BeanShell going by bring it to the ASF, but
my vote here is -1.
There was some discussion on this proposal back in April and one of the
last emails there was this one saying:
If the intention is to have Beanshell become a part of Apache Commons then
the IPMC feels
+1 on incubation then.
Thanks for telling us, Patrick
Please note: while incubation BeanShell needs to do the name search
process which is explained here:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html
You'll most likely asked again on this, but it should be straightforward now
On Fri, May
+1 in that case as well.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, 24 May 2013, 16:59
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:59 PM,
+1 Pedro Giffuni
On May 24, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Dear ASF members,
We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
The proposal draft is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal,
follows below the proposal
+1. Binding.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 24, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Dear ASF members,
We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
The proposal draft is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal,
follows below
I am out of the office until 06/03/2013.
I am traveling for work with limited access to email.
Thanks,
Rich
Note: This is an automated response to your message How many people are
supervising IP clearance? sent on 05/18/2013 10:10:09 AM.
This is the only notification you will receive while
