So what makes it different from jenkins?
06.06.2013 9:36 пользователь Andy Van Den Heuvel
andy.vandenheu...@gmail.com написал:
My apologies for causing confusion. Hopefully this will clear things up:
Abstract
Tashlin is a lightweight application for composing and executing batch jobs
via a
There is no requirement to be different to join, I just wonder
06.06.2013 9:36 пользователь Andy Van Den Heuvel
andy.vandenheu...@gmail.com написал:
My apologies for causing confusion. Hopefully this will clear things up:
Abstract
Tashlin is a lightweight application for composing and
Jenkins is used to build software projects. It's a continuous integration
server.
Tashlin will be more generic, used to build any set of tasks. Also business
processes are possible.
Example: Let's say I want a job to do a HTTP GET call every 5 minutes and
show the results.
In Jenkins, I'll
I usually point to the script jenkins config SCM for that task.
06.06.2013 10:54 пользователь Andy Van Den Heuvel
andy.vandenheu...@gmail.com написал:
Jenkins is used to build software projects. It's a continuous integration
server.
Tashlin will be more generic, used to build any set of
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Andy Van Den Heuvel
andy.vandenheu...@gmail.com wrote:
Jenkins is used to build software projects. It's a continuous integration
server.
Tashlin will be more generic, used to build any set of tasks. Also business
processes are possible.
Example: Let's say I
There is no requirement in Jenkins to extend AbstractProject if you don't
need a SCM. For example we have a number of proprietary plugins that extend
from different points in the Jenkins object tree, e.g. TopLevelItem, Job,
etc depending on how much code reuse is required.
I am not knocking your
Greg was a great co-mentor on Apache Flex.
It would be interesting to see a scatter chart of number of initial mentors vs
time in incubation.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 5, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Jun 5, 2013, at 8:37 AM, Greg Reddin
Abstract
... is a lightweight application for composing and executing batch jobs
via a web user interface.
This sounds a lot like Rundeck. Although Rundesk is centered on
running workflows (sequences of commands) on many target servers for
remote administration/automation, it could just as
There is no requirement to be different to join the ASF or the
incubator, but if you want to attract mentors, then there needs to be
something compelling in a proposal to justify the energy that mentors
will give to the project over time. That is what Andy needs to do - show
what his offering has
This discussion has taugh me a lot.
I understand that the current idea may not be suited for a proposal yet and
I have some extra investigation to do.
Please feel free to contact me, if you are interested to work on this
togheter.
Thank you all for your professional insight and feedback.
On
Hi Andy,
How would Tashlin be different from rundeck [1] ?
Regards,
Bart
[1] http://rundeck.org/
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Andy Van Den Heuvel
andy.vandenheu...@gmail.com wrote:
My apologies for causing confusion. Hopefully this will clear things up:
Abstract
Tashlin is a lightweight
Human Inference confirms to be entitled to transfer the MetaModel to the Apache
Foundation.
One potentially stupid question though: What is an SGA? Our legal dept. was not
aware at least :-)
-Original Message-
From: Kasper Sørensen [mailto:kasper.soren...@humaninference.com]
Sent: 30.
On Thursday, June 6, 2013, Kasper Sørensen wrote:
Human Inference confirms to be entitled to transfer the MetaModel to the
Apache Foundation.
One potentially stupid question though: What is an SGA? Our legal dept.
was not aware at least :-)
Software Grant Agreement [1]. Essentially, the
Hey Noah, thats great and I think as long as the VOTE has not bee closed
we can add new initial members.
Looks like the discussions have calmed down so if no one object I will
start the VOTE thread sometime today.
Thanks,
Henry
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Noah, thats great and I think as long as the VOTE has not bee closed we
can add new initial members.
The IPMC votes on specific language, so as soon as a VOTE thread is *opened*
the proposal must be frozen.
When
Okay cool. Whatever you think is best. Adding someone after the VOTE,
should we need to, is not a problem.
On 6 June 2013 17:46, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Noah, thats great and I think as long as the VOTE has not bee closed
we can add new initial members.
Looks like
Ah ok, thanks Marvin. I agree, the proposal will be frozen once formal VOTE
sent out.
Thank you for the reminder.
- Henry
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.comwrote:
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey Noah,
Hi All,
I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of MetaModel into the Apache
incubator.
The vote will close on June 12, 2013 at 6:00 PM (PST).
[] +1 Accept MetaModel into the Apache incubator
[] +0 Don't care.
[] -1 Don't accept MetaModel into the incubator because...
Full proposal is pasted at
+1 (binding). Good luck guys!
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW:
+1
On Thursday, June 6, 2013, Henry Saputra wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of MetaModel into the Apache
incubator.
The vote will close on June 12, 2013 at 6:00 PM (PST).
[] +1 Accept MetaModel into the Apache incubator
[] +0 Don't care.
[] -1 Don't accept
+1
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
+1 (binding). Good luck guys!
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion
+1.
Sent from my Android.
Regards
Ankit
On Jun 7, 2013 12:31 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of MetaModel into the Apache
incubator.
The vote will close on June 12, 2013 at 6:00 PM (PST).
[] +1 Accept MetaModel into the
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of MetaModel into the Apache
incubator.
The vote will close on June 12, 2013 at 6:00 PM (PST).
[] +1 Accept MetaModel into the Apache incubator
[] +0
23 matches
Mail list logo
