+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now
seemingly resolved.
I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling.
The proposal is included below and is also
+1
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now
seemingly resolved.
I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
Hi -
Well I was late with my retraction. So, I did so to the board directly and with
the report.
Sorry for any consternation. Best of luck. I do think that once your podling
does release that TLP status should come soon.
Regards,
Dave
On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi
+1
Supun..
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Craig L Russell
craig.russ...@oracle.comwrote:
+1
Craig
On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now
seemingly resolved.
I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as
+1 (non-binding)
/***
Joe Stein
Founder, Principal Consultant
Big Data Open Source Security LLC
http://www.stealth.ly
Twitter: @allthingshadoop http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop
/
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013
+1 (non binding)
2013년 9월 13일 금요일에 Doug Cutting님이 작성:
Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now
seemingly resolved.
I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
+ 1
-Sebastien
On 13 Sep 2013, at 00:04, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now
seemingly resolved.
I'd like to call a
+1
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now
seemingly resolved.
I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
On 09/12/2013 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now
seemingly resolved.
I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
+1 binding. Good luck guys!
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW:
Sounds interesting. I'm curious how this is related to other metrics
libraries, like Coda Hale's [1]. Does it have a similar scope?
Thanks,
Tammo
[1] http://metrics.codahale.com/
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Folks,
Below is a proposal for a new
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.comwrote:
Thanks to Dave for his long record of contributing as a shepherd.
Indeed.
And thanks to Dave for checking out Drill. More eyes on a project is
always a good thing.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Sorry for any consternation. Best of luck. I do think that once your
podling does release that TLP status should come soon.
I would say that we have a little more practice needed in incubator. But
the progress is
+1
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now
seemingly resolved.
I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote
...I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling
+1
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
This seems to be similar to the Netflix Servo project [1]. They chose to
expose the data over JMX instead of a web site but the collection seems
like it has similar concepts. Maybe there is a possibility of providing
value added services on top of it? Like aggregation, reporting
Chris
[1]
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Hyunsik Choi hyun...@apache.org wrote:
+1 (non binding)
2013년 9월 13일 금요일에 Doug Cutting님이 작성:
Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now
seemingly resolved.
I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator
Hi we use jmx too ATM. My opinion after some work is sharing counter/gauge
is loosing energy for few gain but if licence is compatible why not...
Le 13 sept. 2013 19:28, Chris Geer ch...@cxtsoftware.com a écrit :
This seems to be similar to the Netflix Servo project [1]. They chose to
expose
On 13 September 2013 15:51, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Hi Olivier,
it sounds really interested, and it's a feature that I would expect in
Kalumet.
I'm really interested to join !
I just added you as a mentor.
Regards
JB
On 09/13/2013 02:10 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi Romain,
cool, count me in. Though, I still have some questions: 1. linked to the
GUI: does this mean, that it won't work without the GUI, i.e. it is not
planned to provide reporters that push data to statsd, graphite, librato et
al? Or does it just mean, that GUI is also in the focus? 2.
+1 (binding)
Andrew.
On 9/12/13 9:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now
seemingly resolved.
I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
[X] +1 Accept Storm into the Incubator
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now
seemingly resolved.
I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator
Hi
The gui is optional but a big added value for me. Rrd is on the radar
(Olivier spoke about it first)
Le 13 sept. 2013 20:43, Tammo van Lessen tvanles...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi Romain,
cool, count me in. Though, I still have some questions: 1. linked to the
GUI: does this mean, that it
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now
seemingly resolved.
I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013, at 02:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now
seemingly resolved.
I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
+ 1 (binding).
Good to see the project coming to ASF.
Suresh
On Sep 12, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now
seemingly resolved.
I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling.
+1
Tom
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now
seemingly resolved.
I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
+1.
-- Hitesh
On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now
seemingly resolved.
I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now
seemingly resolved.
I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling.
The proposal is included below and is also
29 matches
Mail list logo
