I'm in favour of trying this. And its just experiment remember so not
a change for ever for all podlings so please people try to support it
or at least not try to block it.
...ant
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
The possibility of an experiment
I've not managed to keep up with things here recently. I've nit read
all the context or conclusions, so my comment here may be moot but I
just want to make sure that the proposal to only require a single
binding vote for releases has been properly thought through (unless
already rejected).
There
Do these sort of experiments really need consensus? The Incubator PMC
is so big and diverse now it makes getting consensus on some things
all most impossible, after the change a little while back we don't
even need consensus for voting in new Incubator PMC members now.
...ant
On Sat, Nov 23,
On 23/11/13 09:30, ant elder wrote:
(...) The Incubator PMC is so big and diverse now (...)
Sorry, off-topic, but interesting for me to get a better understanding
of the conflict is being discussing: how bit is the Incubator PMC right now?
Because I only see a group of about 20-30 people
Currently listed at 180+.
Upayavira
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
On 23/11/13 09:30, ant elder wrote:
(...) The Incubator PMC is so big and diverse now (...)
Sorry, off-topic, but interesting for me to get a better understanding
of the conflict is being
On 19 November 2013 08:29, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:03 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 November 2013 12:17, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
...
My guess is that Lazy Majority is used because Majority implies more than
50%
On 19 November 2013 07:48, Zhen Zhang zzh...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
Helix 0.7.0-incubating. This is the first release candidate of our fourth
release at Apache.
Apache Helix is a generic cluster management framework
On 19 November 2013 02:50, Kanak Biscuitwala kana...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
Helix 0.6.2-incubating. This is the first release candidate of our third
release at Apache.
Apache Helix is a generic cluster management
I see that 0.7.0 has been released.
However there was no [VOTE][RESULT] mail as far as I can tell.
On 23 November 2013 14:36, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 November 2013 07:48, Zhen Zhang zzh...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as
On 20 November 2013 13:45, Rahul Sharma rahul0...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to call for a vote for Apache Hadoop Development Tools
(incubating), version 0.0.1.incubating. The vote has happened of the dev
mailing list and the community has approved the second release
candidate(RC1)
On 20 November 2013 16:09, larry mccay larry.mc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Knox Gateway 0.3.1 incubating.
A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 3 +1's, and 0
-1's or +0's and now
requires a vote on general@incubator.apache.org.
sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h=d12177168347c9253f3b37946c06a7175f8a1997
The parent directory doesn't actually contain any artifacts that we package as
binaries. Do we need to go through the entire release
sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h=37c20e79d0e132710f0fa0e5e8dbdb95b2e639ff
The parent project doesn't produce any binary artifacts that we release. Do we
need to go through the entire release process again?
Hi:
Closing the vote since it has passed 72 hours.
Here is the result:
+1: 3 (binding)
Patrick Hunt
Olivier Lamy
Mahadev Konar
-1: 0
The vote has passed (pending a response to the email below), thanks a lot to
everyone for voting, thanks to the
mentors for all the support!
Cheers,
The Helix
On 23 November 2013 19:57, Kanak Biscuitwala kana...@hotmail.com wrote:
sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h=d12177168347c9253f3b37946c06a7175f8a1997
The parent directory doesn't actually contain any artifacts that
On 23 November 2013 20:00, Kanak Biscuitwala kana...@hotmail.com wrote:
sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h=37c20e79d0e132710f0fa0e5e8dbdb95b2e639ff
The parent project doesn't produce any binary artifacts that we
On 23 November 2013 20:01, Kanak Biscuitwala kana...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi:
Closing the vote since it has passed 72 hours.
Here is the result:
+1: 3 (binding)
Patrick Hunt
Olivier Lamy
Mahadev Konar
-1: 0
The vote has passed (pending a response to the email below), thanks a lot to
I'm not a mentor, but I can answer that. I believe Zhen isn't subscribed to
this mailing list. Consequently, his result email was sent, but not yet
approved by the mailing list moderator.
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 21:31:14 +
Subject: Re:
No, the current release doesn't have a NOTICE file at the top level. The
subcomponents we intended for release (i.e. helix-core, helix-agent,
helix-examples, and helix-admin-webapp) all have LICENSE, DISCLAIMER, and
NOTICE files. If we need a NOTICE file in the top level, then we'll have to
On 23 November 2013 22:07, Kanak Biscuitwala kana...@hotmail.com wrote:
No, the current release doesn't have a NOTICE file at the top level.
Are you sure about that?
I checked the file helix-0.6.2-incubating-src.zip and it seems to have
NOTICE and LICENSE files in the correct place.
Are you
Oh, interesting. I believe it generates this automatically with the
license-maven-plugin in the build/package stage. In that case, is this an
acceptable solution, or is an explicit NOTICE file still required?
Olivier, can you provide some context?
On 23 November 2013 23:47, Kanak Biscuitwala kana...@hotmail.com wrote:
Oh, interesting. I believe it generates this automatically with the
license-maven-plugin in the build/package stage. In that case, is this an
acceptable solution, or is an explicit NOTICE file still required?
Every ASF
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 00:53:13 +
Subject: Re: [VOTE] helix-0.6.2-incubating
From: seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
On 23 November 2013 23:47, Kanak Biscuitwala kana...@hotmail.com wrote:
Oh, interesting. I believe it generates this automatically with the
23 matches
Mail list logo
