Re: Rearrange the "Project List" into multiple pages?

2014-03-24 Thread David Crossley
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, at 01:14 PM, sebb wrote: > On 25 March 2014 01:46, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > sebb: > > > >> Not always, for example > >> > >> OpenOffice.org => ooo > >> > >> The usecase for the resourcename (perhaps resourceAlias) is to access SVN > > > > Repositories are linked from the pod

Re: Rearrange the "Project List" into multiple pages?

2014-03-24 Thread sebb
On 25 March 2014 01:46, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > sebb: > >> Not always, for example >> >> OpenOffice.org => ooo >> >> The usecase for the resourcename (perhaps resourceAlias) is to access SVN > > Repositories are linked from the podling status page, though it is admittedly > not as convenient to g

Re: Rearrange the "Project List" into multiple pages?

2014-03-24 Thread Marvin Humphrey
sebb: > Not always, for example > > OpenOffice.org => ooo > > The usecase for the resourcename (perhaps resourceAlias) is to access SVN Repositories are linked from the podling status page, though it is admittedly not as convenient to get there in two hops. Many recent podlings use Git -- often

Re: Rearrange the "Project List" into multiple pages?

2014-03-24 Thread sebb
On 25 March 2014 01:18, David Crossley wrote: > On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, at 12:06 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 24 March 2014 20:56, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >> > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 9:17 AM, sebb wrote: >> >> The Project List [1] currently shows full details for all podlings >> >> past and present in a s

Re: Rearrange the "Project List" into multiple pages?

2014-03-24 Thread David Crossley
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, at 12:06 PM, sebb wrote: > On 24 March 2014 20:56, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 9:17 AM, sebb wrote: > >> The Project List [1] currently shows full details for all podlings > >> past and present in a single rather long page. > >> > >> It might be better

Re: Rearrange the "Project List" into multiple pages?

2014-03-24 Thread sebb
On 24 March 2014 20:56, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 9:17 AM, sebb wrote: >> The Project List [1] currently shows full details for all podlings >> past and present in a single rather long page. >> >> It might be better to have individual pages for the >> current/graduated/reti

Re: Flagging up retired podlings on the website

2014-03-24 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:20 PM, sebb wrote: > That's much easier to do than updating the website. > I'll add the missing redirects. Excellent, thank you sebb! > And once that has been done, the contents won't be accessible > externally so such websites can presumably then be deleted? +1 Marv

Re: Flagging up retired podlings on the website

2014-03-24 Thread sebb
On 24 March 2014 21:09, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:17 AM, sebb wrote: >> At present, often the only indication that podling is retired is that >> podlings.xml has been updated. >> >> Some podlings may include a note on their status page (Alois), others >> (Awf) don't. >>

Re: Flagging up retired podlings on the website

2014-03-24 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:17 AM, sebb wrote: > At present, often the only indication that podling is retired is that > podlings.xml has been updated. > > Some podlings may include a note on their status page (Alois), others > (Awf) don't. > > Neither Alois nor Awf have any indication on their web

Re: Rearrange the "Project List" into multiple pages?

2014-03-24 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 9:17 AM, sebb wrote: > The Project List [1] currently shows full details for all podlings > past and present in a single rather long page. > > It might be better to have individual pages for the > current/graduated/retired podlings, with a much simpler one-line > summary of

Re: help needed

2014-03-24 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Subhasis Gorai wrote: > Basically, I felt, before coming up with the > proposal I need to get a champion who will guide me. > Now I didn't know how to find a champion and that's the reason I had shared > the idea, anticipating if someone is interested helping me ou

Flagging up retired podlings on the website

2014-03-24 Thread sebb
At present, often the only indication that podling is retired is that podlings.xml has been updated. Some podlings may include a note on their status page (Alois), others (Awf) don't. Neither Alois nor Awf have any indication on their web-pages that the podling has been retired. As well as upda

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

2014-03-24 Thread Rob Weir
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > We've had a vote within the PPMC which passed: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-odf-dev/201402.mbox/%3CCAP-ksogUFy-OkDkdJcNYDjnn8wUf%3DxcJX%2BG2xxQLKzp5PGKEgA%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > We're now looking for review and approva

RE: help needed

2014-03-24 Thread Srikanth Sundarrajan
Hi Subhasis,    You might want to checkout https://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html Regards Srikanth Sundarrajan - > From: subhasis.go...@gmail.com > Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:42:44 +0530 > Subject: help needed > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > He