Hi,
> Ah, I saw disclaimer in the website [1] which I thought enough for incubator.
> But checking the branding guide [2] seems like incubator need to
> include DISCLAIMER file along with NOTICE and LICENSE files, so this
> could be blocker?
Given it has 3 +1 votes and a result been called it's r
Ah, I saw disclaimer in the website [1] which I thought enough for incubator.
But checking the branding guide [2] seems like incubator need to
include DISCLAIMER file along with NOTICE and LICENSE files, so this
could be blocker?
I think that is the one that could be blocker, but other probably
cou
(resending as it look like the original email got caught up in moderation)
Hi
-1 binding.
There several issues with LICENSE and NOTICE that need to be fixed/explained
before I'd vote +1. I am concerned about the category B licences in particular.
The required DISCLAIMER file is also missing.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 7:33 PM, eberhard speer jr. wrote:
> ...A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 3 +1's.
> Vote thread: http://markmail.org/thread/qlq4b3aijrxjfe5a ...
That includes one Incubator PMC vote (myself), so with Justin's vote
here we need one more.
I'll pin
Thanks for all the feedback. I've opened DRILL-1271 to fix the NOTICE
issue for the next release. We'll also work towards synchronizing
releases. I think it may take a bit of time given how quickly each of
these projects are moving. The primary thing we're focused on is making
sure that we work
