Surely we are not going to start counting signing off on a report as indicative
of good/bad mentoring?
What's important is whether podlings are getting what they need from their
mentors. Besides, someone who has actively mentored one new podling through
initial setup in a first month will
Seriously, give me a break.
This has been discussed ad naseum - It's a quick simple measure
to see if one of the stated requirements for mentors (reading the
monthly report, and *signing that you read it*) has been fulfilled.
It means nothing more than that. I didn't say good. I didn't say bad.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Seriously, give me a break.
This has been discussed ad naseum - It's a quick simple measure
to see if one of the stated requirements for mentors (reading the
monthly report, and *signing that you read it*) has been
Sure Tim I can do that one sec I'll make it an option
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 4, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Seriously, give me a break.
This has been discussed ad naseum - It's
I already am aware of Whimsy. :)
My main goal is to put into place building blocks, for automated tooling,
around bits such as reporting, mailing list management, etc. These can be used
my Whimsy as well as other tooling bits and my site.
As for my site, I like Python and wish to goof around
I said *this* measure was bad, yes. I also explicitly said that I limit my
comments to *this* specific example tooling - I don't see value in counting
ticks on a piece of virtual paper over a period of three years. I care
about who is doing a great job today.
Tim suggests a good way to stop this
The release vote Optiq 0.9.0 passed over a week ago. I have the bits ready and
staged [1] [2]. Now I have to publish the release.
I’ve read
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#understanding-upload.
I now “understand upload” in an abstract sense but am none the wiser.
Hi Julian,
It’s basically a matter of doing an svn checkout of
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/optiq/ and committing the
files there. So for this release you would have a subdirectory named
“apache-optiq-0.9.0-incubating-rc1”.
You also want to have your KEYS file there as
Publishing the contents at [1] can be done by following the steps detailed out
at
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#release-distribution.
For [2], it should just be a matter of hitting the “release” button on nexus.
thanks
— Hitesh
On Sep 4, 2014, at 1:01 PM, Julian
Sorry - hit enter a bit too early.
It should just be a matter of checking out
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator. Add an optiq dir into
that and adding the release artifacts to a version-specific dir..
Once uploaded, they should be available via
On Sep 4, 2014, at 1:31 PM, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote:
Publishing the contents at [1] can be done by following the steps detailed
out at
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#release-distribution.
I read those steps, but was still confused. To this reader,
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Julian Hyde julianh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 4, 2014, at 1:31 PM, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote:
Publishing the contents at [1] can be done by following the steps detailed
out at
On Sep 4, 2014, at 2:05 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Well I think the ASF's implementation of subversion should be pretty
standard - if for no other reason than Subversion is an Apache
Project. :)
I meant “implementation in this sense:
Taylor and Hitesh,
Your instructions worked. It was very straightforward. Thank you.
Julian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
14 matches
Mail list logo
