Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

2014-09-07 Thread John D. Ament
Hi, Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license. Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory. Ideally, your directory name should match the release version (0.5.0.rc2 vs 0.5.0) John On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau jacq...@apache.org wrote: It is my pleasure to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

2014-09-07 Thread Jacques Nadeau
Hi John, Thanks for the feedback. I'd like to respond to each of your concerns: Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license. The notice file states: Please see LICENSE for additional copyright and licensing information. The LICENSE file contains the MIT license. Your source file includes

[VOTE] Release Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating)

2014-09-07 Thread Dave
During our first vote here on the Incubator General mailing lists, folks pointed out a couple of problems in our release files. There were some JavaScript components that we don't need in the source code release and binary files (DLLs in the Dot-Net SDK) that we cannot ship. The offending files

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

2014-09-07 Thread Ted Dunning
+1 (binding) Others have checked signatures and conducted functional tests (and noted tiny discrepancies on the web-site build instructions). I have used this software from the master branch quite recently. As such, I focussed on non-functional aspects of the distro. This looks like a very

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating)

2014-09-07 Thread jan i
On 7 September 2014 18:24, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote: During our first vote here on the Incubator General mailing lists, folks pointed out a couple of problems in our release files. There were some JavaScript components that we don't need in the source code release and binary files

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating)

2014-09-07 Thread John D. Ament
+1 binding Thanks for addressing things quickly and working through some of the pain points :-) On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote: During our first vote here on the Incubator General mailing lists, folks pointed out a couple of problems in our release files.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

2014-09-07 Thread John D. Ament
Sorry, I have to vote -1 The release is not staged in the proper place (e.g. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ ) If this gets moved, I can vote +1 On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Nadeau jacq...@apache.org wrote: Hi John, Thanks for the feedback. I'd like to respond

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

2014-09-07 Thread Jacques Nadeau
As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put something on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC approves that release: Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from the main directories [1] For this candidate, as with our last two

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

2014-09-07 Thread jan i
On 7 September 2014 21:31, Jacques Nadeau jacq...@apache.org wrote: As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put something on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC approves that release: Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

2014-09-07 Thread John D. Ament
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:39 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 7 September 2014 21:31, Jacques Nadeau jacq...@apache.org wrote: As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put something on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC approves that

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

2014-09-07 Thread jan i
On 7 September 2014 21:48, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:39 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 7 September 2014 21:31, Jacques Nadeau jacq...@apache.org wrote: As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put something on

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

2014-09-07 Thread Jacques Nadeau
Hey John, Thanks for the vote and the information. I didn't even realize that the dist.a.o/dev folder existed at until I read your reference at [1]. Always new things to learn. I guess that is another option as opposed to the old skool people.a.o. [1]:

September report

2014-09-07 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
Hi! it looks like September report is almost done, except the following podlings: * Streams [ ](streams) Matt Franklin [ ](streams) Ate Douma [ ](streams) Craig McClanahan * Falcon [ ](falcon) Alan Gates [ ](falcon) Chris Douglas [ ](falcon) Devaraj Das

Re: Mentors heartbeat

2014-09-07 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
Hi Guys, So I spent some time this weekend updating my scripts. They now fully process missing ticks as well. Here is the list they generated of mentors from January 2012 - August 2014 that did *not* sign off on a report (note I'm at the top, bad mentor Chris). The results are a LOT better for

Re: September report

2014-09-07 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Also, if there's anybody planning on creating a summary -- please let me know. Otherwise I'll do by the end of the day tomorrow. If this month's Report Manager needs support, I'm happy to pitch in. If we have to fall back