Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduation of Apache Drill from the Incubator

2014-10-26 Thread Ted Dunning
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Sean Owen sro...@gmail.com wrote: I think projects, realistically, get driven by companies, and necessarily often start around one company. A bit more diversity here would be good but hey. I take the message that being an Apache project doesn't signify as much

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduation of Apache Drill from the Incubator

2014-10-26 Thread Henry Saputra
I wish the discussions that Sean started had occur for projects like Knox or Tez. I interacted and watch Drill project for a while before being pulled out from my prev employer to stop working on it and I could see that the community did try very hard to diversify and embrace new contributors

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduation of Apache Drill from the Incubator

2014-10-26 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: I think we should open another separate thread to continue the diversity discussions without hijacking RESULT thread for Drill. Great point. Thanks, Roman.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduation of Apache Drill from the Incubator

2014-10-26 Thread Timothy Chen
Just want to chime in around diversity in Drill. I've been involved in Drill since the beginning of incubation as a non MapR employee, and from the beginning of the project Drill opened up the design and contributions to the community, and was obvious from the design google docs early on with

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.7.0-incubating

2014-10-26 Thread Robert Metzger
Hi, the vote has passed with +3 binding votes from the IPMC. +1 votes are from: Justin Mclean Alan Gates Henry Saputra Thank you for checking the release. I'll publish the release now On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, +1 binding - vote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.7.0-incubating

2014-10-26 Thread Sean Owen
Belatedly, I also say +1 as the NOTICE and LICENSE look good (an important issue of late), source compiles, tests pass, signature is good, process is good, etc. On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Robert Metzger rmetz...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, This is our second try to release Flink

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.7.0-incubating

2014-10-26 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
This doesn’t seem to exist. Does that matter? Regards, Alan On Oct 22, 2014, at 12:29 AM, Robert Metzger rmetz...@apache.org wrote: The staging repository for this release can be found at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1016

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.7.0-incubating

2014-10-26 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
I ran rat and found that there are a number of Markdown, HTML, Scala archetype files that don’t seem to have the proper license header. Regards, Alan On Oct 22, 2014, at 12:29 AM, Robert Metzger rmetz...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, This is our second try to release Flink 0.7.0-incubating.