Hi,
> Let us know if we have to roll another candidate with those issues fixed or
> taking care of them in
> next release version is sufficient.
Taking care of them in the next release is fine by me. They are all IMO very
minor issues. I'd actually expect more issue for a first release, so well
+1 (binding). Good luck!
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
> On Feb 27, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney
> wrote:
>
> The VOTE is therefore as follows
>
> [ ] +1 I am happy with Commons RDF entering incubation
> [ ] +0/-0 I am neither yay or nay
> [ ] -1 I am not happy with this proposal because
>
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney
wrote:
> [ ] +1 I am happy with Commons RDF entering incubation
> [ ] +0/-0 I am neither yay or nay
> [ ] -1 I am not happy with this proposal because
The addition of nominated Mentors John Ament, Gary Gregory, and Rob Vesse and
Champion
+1 (non-binding) :-)
On 27 Feb 2015 19:19, "Lewis John Mcgibbney"
wrote:
> Hi general@,
>
> Over the last while a number of individuals have been putting together a
> proposal and gathering interest in proposing Commons RDF for acceptance
> into the Apache Incubator. Having worked our way through
On 27/02/15 19:19, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
Hi general@,
Over the last while a number of individuals have been putting together a
proposal and gathering interest in proposing Commons RDF for acceptance
into the Apache Incubator. Having worked our way through the Incubator
documentation checkl
