+1 (non-binding) :-)
On 27 Feb 2015 19:19, Lewis John Mcgibbney lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi general@,
Over the last while a number of individuals have been putting together a
proposal and gathering interest in proposing Commons RDF for acceptance
into the Apache Incubator. Having
On 27/02/15 19:19, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
Hi general@,
Over the last while a number of individuals have been putting together a
proposal and gathering interest in proposing Commons RDF for acceptance
into the Apache Incubator. Having worked our way through the Incubator
documentation
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney
lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com wrote:
[ ] +1 I am happy with Commons RDF entering incubation
[ ] +0/-0 I am neither yay or nay
[ ] -1 I am not happy with this proposal because
The addition of nominated Mentors John Ament, Gary Gregory, and
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 27, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney
lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com wrote:
The VOTE is therefore as follows
[ ] +1 I am happy with Commons RDF entering incubation
[ ] +0/-0 I am neither yay or nay
[ ] -1 I am not happy with this proposal
+1 (binding). Good luck!
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Hi,
Let us know if we have to roll another candidate with those issues fixed or
taking care of them in
next release version is sufficient.
Taking care of them in the next release is fine by me. They are all IMO very
minor issues. I'd actually expect more issue for a first release, so well
