I am sorry, I must have confused the response then :) I shall correct it
immediately. Pardon my confusion
On 12 Aug 2015 11:42, "Hyunsik Choi" wrote:
> Hi Atri,
>
> I didn't answer your ask to be a mentor for this project.
>
> - hyunsik
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Atri Sharma wrote:
>
Hi Atri,
I didn't answer your ask to be a mentor for this project.
- hyunsik
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Atri Sharma wrote:
> Fixed, please see and comment.
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Atri Sharma wrote:
>
>> Thanks for pointing it out, let me fix.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4
+1 from me (binding).
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattm...
+1 (binding)
Good luck!
Cos
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 04:15PM, Dave wrote:
> The Usergrid project has made three releases from the Incubator (1.0.0,
> 1.0.1 and 1.0.2), has added multiple and diverse committers, and the
> project has completed all required items on the graduation check-list [1].
The Apache REEF PPMC has voted to release Apache REEF 0.12.0-incubating
based on the release candidate described below. Now it is the IPMC's turn
to vote.
The PPMC vote passed with 5 +1 votes:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-reef-dev/201508.mbox/%3CCABz36OSroQMEtagSiKsWz_L81bf=r
Btw this discussion is typical of the ones I have had with Amol. Every
decision has a rationale, or the community is willing to be flexible. The
willingness to listen and to justify decisions bodes very well for an
incubation, I think.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrot
Niall,
Thanks for catching. I replaced '-' with '_' as per atlassian policy. I am
suspecting that ASF does not allow '_' as none of the project keys have
'_'. I have added a comment that '_' can be removed if that is the policy.
Wiki updated.
Thks,
Amol
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Niall Pem
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Amol Kekre wrote:
> oh! We preferred that during our discussion. Somehow we thought there was a
> limit. I have changed it to full names (APEX-CORE, APEX-MALHAR). If there
> is a limit we can reduce the number of chars later. wiki is updated.
>
> https://wiki.apac
oh! We preferred that during our discussion. Somehow we thought there was a
limit. I have changed it to full names (APEX-CORE, APEX-MALHAR). If there
is a limit we can reduce the number of chars later. wiki is updated.
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ApexProposal
Thks,
Amol
On Tue, Aug 11, 20
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:21 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:13 PM Niall Pemberton >
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:47 AM, John D. Ament
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:43 PM Marvin Humphrey <
> mar...@rectangular.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:13 PM Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:47 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:43 PM Marvin Humphrey
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:31 PM, John D. Ament
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM Niall
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:47 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:43 PM Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:31 PM, John D. Ament
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM Niall Pemberton <
> > niall.pember...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Geod
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:43 PM Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:31 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM Niall Pemberton <
> niall.pember...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Geode was supposed to report - but its not included in the missing
> reports
> >
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:31 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM Niall Pemberton >
> wrote:
>
> > Geode was supposed to report - but its not included in the missing
> reports
> > list.
> >
>
> Hmm very good point. podlings.xml indicates they shouldn't have, but based
> o
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:31 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>
>> Geode was supposed to report - but its not included in the missing reports
>> list.
>
> Hmm very good point. podlings.xml indicates they shouldn't have, but based
> on when they
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 04.08.2015 18:12, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > What about the Ignite thread was "unfortunate"? That it was a bit
> > heated at times, or just the fact that there was disagreement? I fear
> > that there's too much bias towards +1'ing things ev
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> Geode was supposed to report - but its not included in the missing reports
> list.
>
Hmm very good point. podlings.xml indicates they shouldn't have, but based
on when they entered the incubator they should have. Even going back to
rev 1
Geode was supposed to report - but its not included in the missing reports
list.
Niall
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 1:30 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> All,
>
> I'd like to present the draft board report for additional community input.
> We have reports expected from 19 podlings, 12 reported, 7 did no
If there isn’t a char limit on project names in JIRA, wouldn’t it just be
better to use “APEX-CORE” and “APEX-MALHAR” to match the actual project names,
repos, etc?
thanks
— Hitesh
On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:25 PM, Amol Kekre wrote:
> Chris,
> Thanks for articulating what I was going to respond wi
On 04.08.2015 18:12, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> What about the Ignite thread was "unfortunate"? That it was a bit
> heated at times, or just the fact that there was disagreement? I fear
> that there's too much bias towards +1'ing things even when folks have
> legitimate concerns.
Heated and disagree
Chris,
Thanks for articulating what I was going to respond with after talking to
folks here. We indeed see versions for Malhar and Apex differing. We expect
Malhar versions to change much more rapidly than Apex.
Ted,
We discussed the impact of single jira on versioning. For example we
expect Malh
Bertrand,
We discussed your suggesstion on naming the git repos as follows. There was
a consensus on using git repos scoped with apex.
incubator-apex-core.git
incubator-apex-malhar.git
I have changed the names on the wiki as per your suggesstion. I will cover
your suggesstion of jira projects nam
One thing to consider is that release version numbers are tied to specific
JIRA projects. If the intention is for Apex and Malhar version numbers to
be independent, then using a single JIRA project could introduce some risk
of confusion if an Apex version number accidentally gets applied to a
Malh
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 7:19 PM, jan i >
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 11, 2015, John D. Ament > wrote:
>
> > I would not be so strict with the deadline, as it is does not seem to
> > interfere with the additional work with the report.
>
>
Bertrand,
Good point. I will take it up with folks and get back soon.
Thks
Amol
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
> > ...With such
> > tight integration why ask for different JIRAs for the two projects and
>
Ted,
I agree that repo is more critical than jira instance. I am taking up your
suggesstion with folks and should get back soon.
Thks
Amol
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 3:48 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
> I personally see far less reason for separate JIRA instances than git
> repos. Having all jiras unde
Fixed, please see and comment.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Atri Sharma wrote:
> Thanks for pointing it out, let me fix.
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:08 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 11 August 2015 at 10:46, Apache Wiki wrote:
>> > Dear Wiki user,
>> >
>> > You have subscribed to a wiki page or
I personally see far less reason for separate JIRA instances than git repos.
Having all jiras under APEX seems a good choice.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:32, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> As for JIRA, I would apply the same rule, so APX-CORE and APX-MHAR maybe.
Thanks for pointing it out, let me fix.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:08 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 11 August 2015 at 10:46, Apache Wiki wrote:
> > Dear Wiki user,
> >
> > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Incubator Wiki"
> for change notification.
> >
> > The "ConcertedProposal" pa
On 11 August 2015 at 10:46, Apache Wiki wrote:
> Dear Wiki user,
>
> You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Incubator Wiki" for
> change notification.
>
> The "ConcertedProposal" page has been changed by AtriSharma:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ConcertedProposal
>
>
> =
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> ...With such
> tight integration why ask for different JIRAs for the two projects and two
> different repos?...
I don't have a problem with asking for multiple Git repositories but
their names should share a common prefix to express that
thanks for your feedback, i canceled the vote, we fixed the deps and
startet a new vote.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:11 AM, jan i wrote:
>> ...we do not have a demand that a release must contain a
>> test set, so if the release
>> does
32 matches
Mail list logo
