Cool.
I can't find info on how much it costs ASF, any pointers before embarking
on 100+ artifact signing spree... ;-)
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:35 AM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015
All,
I've completed the last few report manager steps for August 2015 - updated
the clutch, wiki, etc. The next report has a high number of podlings that
I'll probably try to rebalance, but any additional volunteers from the
community to help shepherd podlings would be great.
On Aug 21, 2015 1:54 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Ross Gardler ross.gard...@microsoft.com
wrote:
...
So, in the strictest sense, distributions that make minor changes for
their distribution should call it Bar powered by Apache Foo in order to
On Aug 20, 2015, at 11:19 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
A snapshot is not a release. Licenses kick in at distribution/
release.
Lets just imagine if Jim, VP Legal is actually correct in his
On Aug 20, 2015, at 8:27 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On Aug 20, 2015 08:52, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Coming in late.
A snapshot is not a release. Licenses kick in at distribution/
release.
I want to fix FUD before it infests the rafters and
On Aug 20, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Coming in late.
A snapshot is not a release. Licenses kick in at distribution/
release.
Are you sure? When you have a public source
They do? This is the statement of the VP Legal, so whether it is right or
wrong, here at the ASF we attempt to honor the 'spirit' of the policy of
other licensors when we use their code, and we would hope others would
honor the 'spirit' of our policies here. It that is the underlying
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Aug 20, 2015, at 8:27 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
On Aug 20, 2015 08:52, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Coming in late.
A snapshot is not a release. Licenses kick in at
On Aug 20, 2015, at 10:16 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
This thread started as a discussion of Linux distros and trademarks.
Perhaps I could try to return it there?
If a distro takes a
Jim already addressed this in an overlapping email. I tried to address it but
it seems quibbling over individual words describing process was more important
than understanding the intended message. So let me try again, this time using
the corrected words in my email and adding Jim's further
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Aug 20, 2015, at 11:19 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
A snapshot is not a release. Licenses kick in at distribution/
[Failing at dealing with this cross-posted and variously-branched discussion on
two lists, so I am doing it too. Also OT with respect to Ross's declaration,
but it has to do with the fact that release is not so well distinguished as
one might hope.]
Minor nit? #1:
Generally, because of what
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Is Madlib even viable as an independent project?
Yes it is extremely viable. There's been a number of prototypes of porting
MADlib to other SQL-on-Hadoop projects (Impala is the one I know of)
and also quite a bit of
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
...
== External Dependencies ==...
There's some GPL/LGPL stuff in there, IMO the proposal should include
a plan for coping with those.
Hi Ted!
this is one of those blind spot things I can't even explain. I was so sure
Drill was implemented in C/C++ that I never bothered to check. I'm now
curios as to who may have implanted that false memory (did you guys
talk about when it was first getting designed?).
But anyway, more to the
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
this is one of those blind spot things I can't even explain. I was so sure
Drill was implemented in C/C++ that I never bothered to check. I'm now
curios as to who may have implanted that false memory (did you guys
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Christian Tzolov
christian.tzo...@gmail.com wrote:
Is PXF (HAWQ extension framework) going to be managed together with the
HAWQ ASF project or as a child one?
For now it is part of the same codebase managed by the same community.
If it gets
picked up by other
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
...most of the core developers are currently NOT affiliated
with the ASF and would require new ICLAs before committing to the
project
...
== Affiliations ==
...
* Pivotal: everyone else on this proposal...
So IIUC
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
...
== External Dependencies ==...
There's some GPL/LGPL stuff in there, IMO the proposal should include
a plan for coping with those.
-Bertrand
-
To
Is PXF (HAWQ extension framework) going to be managed together with the
HAWQ ASF project or as a child one?
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
...
== External
Is Madlib even viable as an independent project?
Should it be part of the overall Hawq project?
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Hi!
I would like to start a discussion on accepting HAWQ
into ASF Incubator. The proposal is available at:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Ross Gardler ross.gard...@microsoft.com
wrote:
...
So, in the strictest sense, distributions that make minor changes for
their distribution should call it Bar powered by Apache Foo in order to
differentiate it from an official release of the foundation. In the
22 matches
Mail list logo
