Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) St.Ack On Nov 24, 2015 11:33 AM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > Hi all, > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to > call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is > pasted below and also available on the wiki

[DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

Hi all, We'd like to start a discussion proposing creating Metron as an incubator podling. The proposal is on the wiki here: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetronProposal I would call your attention to the background section in particular. The condensed version is that the original code base

Re: Adopting non-ASF AL projects (was Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal)

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > >b) are you just re-inventing the ICLA? > > In my mind, the ICLA represents your formal pledge to be part of an ASF > community and continue to contribute. It has to be recorded by the > secretary and reads like legal-ese

Sheparding

Hi, I was interested in being an incubator Shepard, let me know if there is anything I can do in this area. Best, Zach -- Zach Jaffee B.S. Computer Science Case Western Reserve University Class of 2017 Operations Director | WRUW FM 91.1 Cleveland Secretary | Recruitment Chair | Phi Kappa Theta

Re: [VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) - Sam Ruby On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > After initial discussion (under the name Spark-Kernel), please vote on the > acceptance of Torii Project for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The > full proposal is > available at the end

Re: [VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

+1 from me. ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

This is an interesting proposal that seems would build a community where an open one doesn't really exist at the moment. A project like this needs a healthy community to survive and scale with the pace of changes in attacks. I for one would be interested in lending a hand as a contributor or

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) St.Ack On Nov 24, 2015 1:04 PM, "Henry Robinson" wrote: > Hi - > > The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's been > sufficient opportunity for discussion around our proposal to bring Impala > to the ASF Incubator. > > I'd like to call

Re: [VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

And off-course, Here is my +1 (binding). On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > After initial discussion (under the name Spark-Kernel), please vote on > the acceptance of Torii Project for incubation at the Apache Incubator. > The full proposal is >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Nov 30, 2015, at 1:08 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > And off-course, Here is my +1 (binding). > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Luciano Resende > wrote: > >> After initial discussion (under the name Spark-Kernel), please vote on

RE: Ripple to be retired from the incubator?

Marvin I would love to accept your help in retiring the podling. I'll close out the trademark issue with the community in parallel. Thank you Ross -Original Message- From: Marvin Humphrey [mailto:mar...@rectangular.com] Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 5:30 PM To:

RE: Ripple to be retired from the incubator?

Actually adding general@ for guidance on the process -Original Message- From: Ross Gardler [mailto:ross.gard...@microsoft.com] Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 3:21 PM To: d...@ripple.incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Ripple to be retired from the incubator? Looks like there is consensus

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

I'm interested as well, particularly given the ties to Storm. I'd be happy to volunteer as mentor and/or committer if it would be welcome. I have some familiarity with both projects (obviously one more so than the other ;) ). -Taylor > On Nov 30, 2015, at 1:15 PM, larry mccay

Re: Ripple to be retired from the incubator?

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Looks like there is consensus here. I'm not sure of the process as I've > never been through it before so copying general@incubator for guidance. > > General@ the Ripple Podling has consensus on retiring itself

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Myriad 0.1.0 (incubating)

Hi, +1 binding. I checked: - release name contains incubating - signature and hash good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE good. May be minor LICENSE issue re bootstrap (see below). - no unexpected binary files - all source files have Apache headers - can compile from source You might

Re: [VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

+1 > On Dec 1, 2015, at 2:08 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > And off-course, Here is my +1 (binding). > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Luciano Resende > wrote: > >> After initial discussion (under the name Spark-Kernel), please vote on >> the

Re: [DISCUSS] Spark-Kernel Incubator Proposal

Sorry for the late reply. FYI there is an opensource project called torii already: https://vestorly.github.io/torii/ Whether there is a trademark or not, I'd recommend a name that does not collide with another project. On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Retire Ripple

+1 (binding) On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> The Ripple community has been discussing retirement on their dev list. >> >>

FOSDEM 2016 - take action by 4th of December 2015

As most of you probably know FOSDEM 2016 (the biggest, 100% free open source developer conference) is right around the corner: https://fosdem.org/2016/ We hope to have an ASF booth and we would love to see as many ASF projects as possible present at various tracks (AKA Developer rooms):

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Myriad 0.1.0 (incubating)

Thanks Justin. Appreciate your feedback. > You may want to also double check the version of bootstrap you have bundled, the comment says 3.2 and that it is Apache licensed, however > github shows 3.2 is MIT licensed. [1] I think the change from Apache to MIT happened at around 3.0.3. [2] If this

Websites at podling.apache.org

Greets, It seems that podling websites are available at both these URL patterns: http://podling.incubator.apache.org http://podling.apache.org See for example: http://systemml.apache.org/ http://systemml.incubator.apache.org/ http://mynewt.apache.org/

[VOTE] Retire Ripple

Greetings, The Ripple community has been discussing retirement on their dev list. http://s.apache.org/LjX It would be more clear cut if there had been a VOTE thread, but since the discussion took place on the podling dev list (rather than the private list or some other non-central channel),

Re: [VOTE] Retire Ripple

+1 On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greetings, > > The Ripple community has been discussing retirement on their dev list. > > http://s.apache.org/LjX > > It would be more clear cut if there had been a VOTE thread, but since the > discussion

Re: [DISCUSS] Spark-Kernel Incubator Proposal

Hi David & All, The 'spark-kernel/torii' is a "good to have" tool. Pardon me, I am not the judge in any way.After going through this thread and the referred links, it seems, by giving it a decent publicity in Apache Spark (may be provide link, etc.),would be sufficient enough for its survival

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

They used to have a redirects. But you' re right, looks like not anymore... So we should ask INFRA to get a 307 resolving the TLP domains. On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greets, > > It seems that podling websites are available at both these URL

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

+1.A perfect candidate(Metron/OpenSOC) for apache.org.  Thanking you.With RegardsSree On Monday, November 30, 2015 4:07 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: I'm interested as well, particularly given the ties to Storm. I'd be happy to volunteer as mentor and/or committer if

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Thanking you.With RegardsSree On Monday, November 30, 2015 9:33 AM, stack wrote: +1 (binding) St.Ack On Nov 24, 2015 11:33 AM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > Hi all, > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so

Re: [VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Thanking you.With RegardsSree On Monday, November 30, 2015 3:21 PM, Reynold Xin wrote: +1 > On Dec 1, 2015, at 2:08 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > And off-course, Here is my +1 (binding). > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:33

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Thanking you.With RegardsSree On Monday, November 30, 2015 9:34 AM, stack wrote: +1 (binding) St.Ack On Nov 24, 2015 1:04 PM, "Henry Robinson" wrote: > Hi - > > The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think

Re: Adopting non-ASF AL projects (was Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal)

OK, next draft below. Some comments first: On 11/29/15, 6:25 AM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: >Alex, > >Here are a couple of comments, mostly kind of independent: > >a) this is a good start. Very sound directionally. > >b) are you just re-inventing the ICLA? In my mind, the

Re: Adopting non-ASF AL projects (was Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal)

> On Nov 27, 2015, at 10:28 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > In these cases, we are not creating a new PMC around these code bases, we > are placing it under control of an existing PMC. Which, in effect, creates a new PMC around those code bases :) > Plus, there is >