On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> > ...
> > Binding -1s (4):
> > Greg Stein
> > Ralph Goers
> > Roman Shaposhnik
> > Konstantin Boudnik ...
>
> Please
Thanks Owen (and apologies for missing your vote: I swore I saw it at the
time, then checked the thread twice and somehow missed it).
The updated results are below:
Binding +1s (18):
Todd Lipcon
Arvind Prabhakar
Chris Mattmann
Julien Le Dem
Carl Steinbach
Brock Noland
RIght. That's why I call it "opt-out" rather than opt-in. If there is no
active community to opt out, then I see no problem with us picking up the
codebase and (re)forming a community around it.
With ALv2 licensing on the codebase, I believe we have most of the rights
we need, but will continue
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> ...
> Binding -1s (4):
> Greg Stein
> Ralph Goers
> Roman Shaposhnik
> Konstantin Boudnik ...
Please indicate how the issues that are behind these -1s have been addressed.
I might have missed something,
This vote is now closed and passes with 17 binding +1 votes, 7 non-binding
+1 votes and 4 binding -1 votes.
Thanks to everyone that voted!
Here is my tally of the votes:
Binding +1s (17):
Todd Lipcon
Arvind Prabhakar
Chris Mattmann
Julien Le Dem
Carl Steinbach
Brock
I contributed to this project a little bit (as an outside consultant) back
when Cisco was running it, and would be interested in staying involved with
it if this happens.
Phil
This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
Not that it changes the result, but I also voted +1.
https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg52096.html
.. Owen
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> This vote is now closed and passes with 17 binding +1 votes, 7 non-binding
> +1 votes
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 12/01/2015 11:37 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> > On 1 December 2015 at 14:32, Bertrand Delacretaz >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Henry Robinson
>
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> Greg,
>
> May I suggest a compromise? Enter incubation with no explicit commit
> policy and let the community choose a commit policy if and when they see
> fit.
>
The community already discussed it and made a choice. They'll
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
>...
> On 1 December 2015 at 14:46, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>...
> > Given as we have no actual incubator policy that states whether
> > consensus is required or not - or at least none that I could
Hongbin,
Thank you Hongbin for your interest. Your backgroupd seems to be an
expert about graph processing and very helpful for S2Graph. We are
welcome to contributions. I'm looking forward to your contribution to
S2Graph.
All,
Jira, wiki, mailing list, and git repository currently are
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
>...
> As far as I can tell from the proposals and DISCUSS, RTC was the process
> already present in the community proposed. If the -1 folks would like to
> convince the community to change its approach then they should take
On 1 December 2015 at 14:32, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> > ...
> > Binding -1s (4):
> > Greg Stein
> > Ralph Goers
> > Roman Shaposhnik
> > Konstantin Boudnik ...
>
> Please
Greg,
May I suggest a compromise? Enter incubation with no explicit commit policy and
let the community choose a commit policy if and when they see fit.
Julian
> On Dec 1, 2015, at 2:35 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
On 1 December 2015 at 14:46, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 12/01/2015 11:37 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> > On 1 December 2015 at 14:32, Bertrand Delacretaz >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Henry Robinson
> wrote:
On 1 December 2015 at 15:22, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> >...
>
> > On 1 December 2015 at 14:46, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> >
> >...
>
> > > Given as we have no actual incubator policy that
The vote for accepting Kudu into the Incubator has now closed. The vote
count is as follows:
+1 (binding): 29
+1 (not binding): 9
-1 (binding): 2
The full list of voters is reproduced below. Apologies if I mistakenly
counted a binding vote as non-binding (had to check the IPMC members list
for a
On 12/01/2015 11:37 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> On 1 December 2015 at 14:32, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Binding -1s (4):
>>> Greg Stein
>>> Ralph Goers
>>> Roman
Hi,
Can any other IPMC member help out here?
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
The only mention of consensus I could find is in the actual development of the
actual proposal. I’m sure one could argue that that implies that whether
consensus is achieved is by the vote, but with a group as large as the IPMC it
would be horrible to allow a single vote to block a podling from
A few thoughts from a 'bystander':
It's great that Greg and the others who disagree cast their dissenting
votes. That doesn't mean that we should throw out process. If the process
is 3x+1 and more +1 than -1, this vote passes as Henry stated. Greg even
stated (if I understand his statements
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> The only mention of consensus I could find is in the actual development of
> the actual
> proposal. I’m sure one could argue that that implies that whether consensus
> is achieved
> is by the vote, but with a group
Niall
Thanks for digging up the reference
I knew INFRA had made the change for a reason but couldn't remember the
reasoning
Rob
On 01/12/2015 16:18, "Niall Pemberton" wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey
>wrote:
>
>>
Thanks for the good suggestion, Bertrand. I've included your paragraph in
the background section of the proposal.
.. Owen
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> > ...To
Hi,
I would like edit access to the wiki so that I can add the project report
for Apache Samoa for December 2015 due tomorrow.
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2015
Thank you for your help!
Nicolas Kourtellis
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Nicolas Kourtellis
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like edit access to the wiki so that I can add the project report
> for Apache Samoa for December 2015 due tomorrow.
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2015
>
> Thank you for your help!
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Rob Vesse wrote:
> I seem to remember that INFRA used to do redirects but decided to stop
> doing them because it made the transition to TLP easier for podlings post
> graduation because their "final" URL was active from as soon as they start
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:06 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> I'm interested as well, particularly given the ties to Storm.
>
> I'd be happy to volunteer as mentor and/or committer if it would be
> welcome. I have some familiarity with both projects (obviously one more so
> than
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Jacques Nadeau wrote:
>...
> It's great that Greg and the others who disagree cast their dissenting
> votes. That doesn't mean that we should throw out process. If the process
> is 3x+1 and more +1 than -1, this vote passes as Henry stated.
Yes, INFRA arguments are completely valid. But rather than the DNS
resolution of the domains, I think Marvin was asking how domains are
handled at the HTTP level.
Niall
Thanks for digging up the reference
I knew INFRA had made the change for a reason but couldn't remember the
reasoning
Rob
On
Owen,
Given that the majority of this code was produced as a work-for-hire,
wouldn't it be good to get some sign off from Cisco on this migration?
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We'd like to start a discussion proposing creating Metron
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards!
-
Luke Han
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Sree V
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) Thanking you.With RegardsSree
>
>
> On Monday, November 30, 2015 3:21 PM, Reynold Xin
> wrote:
>
>
> +1
>
I seem to remember that INFRA used to do redirects but decided to stop
doing them because it made the transition to TLP easier for podlings post
graduation because their "final" URL was active from as soon as they start
(assuming they don't name change during incubation)
Pretty much any of the
Hi Owen,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> ...The
> condensed version is that the original code base (OpenSOC) was created by a
> company (Cisco) that put it on github as ALv2, but then hasn't been working
> on it. We posted a message
>
Well, the transition is not that hard if:
a) during incubation podling.a.o redirects (302/307) to podling.i.a.o
b) after graduation podling.i.a.o redirects (301) to podling.a.o
right?
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Rob Vesse wrote:
> I seem to remember that INFRA
Hi Bertrand,
Taken in the opposite case, is there someone from OpenSOC
objecting to this code being forked? It doesn’t sound like
there is a community there.
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Think I've missed the vote window, but
+1 binding
I will repeat what I raised when the proposal first came up, something that
wasn't addresses at all: ZeroMQ is LGPL, which is forbidden as a mandatory
dependency in ASF projects.
Step 1 of the project is going to have to confirm that the
Hi Chris,
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> ...Taken in the opposite case, is there someone from OpenSOC
> objecting to this code being forked?...
It doesn't look like anyone is objecting, but if we can reasonably
find out who owns that code it's fair
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi Owen,
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> > ...The
> > condensed version is that the original code base (OpenSOC) was created
> by a
> > company (Cisco) that put
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> Could you add iandunlop to the contributors list for the incubator wiki
> please.
Done.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hello,
Could you add iandunlop to the contributors list for the incubator wiki
please.
Cheers,
Ian
--
Ian Dunlop, eScience Lab
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
http://orcid.org/-0001-7066-3350
-
To
Michael,
This is something to ask of your mentors.
Removing dev@comm (bcc) and moving to general. they can either grant or
ask for karma on private MLs.
John
On Dec 1, 2015 03:40, "Michael Wu" wrote:
> Hi Mentors,
>
> I'm a member of project "incubator-eagle", I need to
Hi,
Apache Sling is receiving code for a new Sling Pipes module.
See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/sling-pipes.html
Please vote to approve this contribution.
This is a lazy consensus majority vote, open for at least 72 hours.
-Bertrand
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> ...To avoid forking communities, you need to either have:
> * the community wants to move to Apache
> * the community is dead or inactive
>
> There is a pretty compelling evidence that OpenSOC is currently inactive...
Ok,
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> Greets,
>
> It seems that podling websites are available at both these URL patterns:
>
> http://podling.incubator.apache.org
> http://podling.apache.org
>
> See for example:
>
> http://systemml.apache.org/
>
45 matches
Mail list logo