RE: [PORPOSAL] Fineract

Thanks Markus, I'm excited to see this project being proposed as an incubating ASF project. IPMC, the proposal is in the wiki at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FineractProposal -Original Message- From: Markus Geiß [mailto:mge...@mifos.org] Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 11:32 PM

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenMiracl for Incubation

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Brian Spector wrote: > Hi All, > > thanks for everyone's feedback and Sterling thank you for graciously coming > on board as an additional mentor. > > I'd like to propose that the proposed Apache OpenMiracl incubation project > be

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

Let me ping my contact as well. Thanks, Roman. On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I am also working on my contacts to find the right person. > > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:34 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> I

[DISCUSS] Milagro for Incubation

On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 19:36 -0800, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Thanks for working with us, Brian. As far as I'm concerned, the name > "Milagro" sounds great -- a clearly distinct brand, yet evoking its > origins. I've updated the proposal to use the new name. It's now at

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > Well, the transition is not that hard if: > > a) during incubation podling.a.o redirects (302/307) to podling.i.a.o > > b) after graduation podling.i.a.o redirects (301) to podling.a.o > > right? Discussion has quieted

[PORPOSAL] Fineract

Hey all, hope this finds you well. We, the Mifos community, want to propose our project for incubation. Please find the proposal below. = Fineract Proposal = == Abstract == Fineract (\’fīn-,ə-ˌrakt\: A hypercube for digital financial services) is an open source system for core banking as a

[IP CLEARANCE] JMeter Dashboard / Report

Hi, Apache JMeter is receiving a code for a new Dashbord / Report module. See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/jmeter-dashboard-report.html Please vote to approve this contribution. This is a lazy consensus majority vote, open for at least 72 hours. Milamber

Re: [VOTE] Retire Ripple

+1 (binding, Ripple mentor since it arrived) On Tue, Dec 1, 2015, at 05:54, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greetings, > > The Ripple community has been discussing retirement on their dev list. > > http://s.apache.org/LjX > > It would be more clear cut if there had been a VOTE thread, but since the

RE: Ripple to be retired from the incubator?

Hey all, I've been OOF for a couple of weeks, so I'm catching up on the threads. I'm just wondering where we're at now, exactly. Specifically: 1. Do we need an official vote thread on this, or can we consider that done based on existing discussion? If the former, I'm happy to start it - but

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Myriad 0.1.0 (incubating)

Hello All, Just a reminder that this vote is still open. We've received feedback, and a binding +1, from just one IPMC member (Justin Mclean). Appreciate if more folks can try out the RC and vote. Thanks, Santosh On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Santosh Marella

Re: apache-website-template git commit: Add LICENSE and NOTICE files

PING On 28 November 2015 at 22:59, sebb wrote: > On 28 November 2015 at 16:26, wrote: >> Repository: apache-website-template >> Updated Branches: >> refs/heads/master b140c230c -> 9e881e247 >> >> >> Add LICENSE and NOTICE files >> >> Properly document

Re: apache-website-template git commit: Add LICENSE and NOTICE files

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:17 AM, sebb wrote: > PING I'd also like to see this addressed. Licensing documentation for Incubator sample code should adhere to best practices. > On 28 November 2015 at 22:59, sebb wrote: >> On 28 November 2015 at 16:26,

RE: apache-website-template git commit: Add LICENSE and NOTICE files

I have a question regarding the NOTICE and LICENSE file as it pertains to an MIT or BSD license. If I, for example, have a source file with a copyright notice followed by MIT license text, can't I just put the copyright notice in the LICENSE file with a pointer to the MIT license text (or actually

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) --Chris Nauroth On 12/3/15, 9:33 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: >The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on >whether >Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted >below and is available on the wiki as well.

Re: apache-website-template git commit: Add LICENSE and NOTICE files

Hi Roberta, Can you ask this on your other thread and include more information about whether this is a file that has been donated to the ASF or is third-party? On 12/3/15, 8:40 AM, "Roberta Marton" wrote: >I have a question regarding the NOTICE and LICENSE file as it

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

Phillip, The current committers have voted to add you. I've updated the proposal to reflect that. .. Owen On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Phillip Rhodes wrote: > I contributed to this project a little bit (as an outside consultant) back > when Cisco was running

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on > whether Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is > pasted below and is available on the wiki as well. > >

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] JMeter Dashboard / Report

+1 - thanks for going into detail on CCLAs, and the schedules for each. Made it much easier to review. On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Milamber wrote: > Hi, > > Apache JMeter is receiving a code for a new Dashbord / Report module. > > See

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

I think that there was a still pending question of why not ask Cisco for an SGA for cleanliness. The only answer that I heard was that corporations don't like to do things like and so Cisco hadn't been asked. That seems like an insufficient answer. On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Owen

[VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted below and is available on the wiki as well. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetronProposal We've added a paragraph in the background section

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding). Solid apache mentors and team. Good luck! On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted >

Re: apache-website-template git commit: Add LICENSE and NOTICE files

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:17 AM, sebb wrote: > > PING > > I'd also like to see this addressed. Licensing documentation for Incubator > sample code should adhere to best practices. > > > On 28

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenMiracl for Incubation

Hi Jan, thanks for your interest! :-) To answer your question... Already noted in the proposal for being donated is the baseline platform for Milagro, which, on a high level, consists of the following: Milagro libraries and tools consisting of: - Distributed Key Management platform and

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding). Good luck. On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:38 AM Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > +1 > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Dec 3, 2015, at 9:33 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > > > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a

RE: [VOTE] Retire Ripple

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Brad Kolarov | B23 LLC | b...@b23.io | 703.957.9155 Original message From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: 12/03/2015 14:35 (GMT-05:00) To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Retire Ripple +1

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1, assuming no legal issues WRT Cisco. Phil This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh < venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote: > +1 (binding). > > Good luck. > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:38 AM Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < >

Re: [VOTE] Retire Ripple

+1 [binding] On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 08:54PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greetings, > > The Ripple community has been discussing retirement on their dev list. > > http://s.apache.org/LjX > > It would be more clear cut if there had been a VOTE thread, but since the > discussion took place on

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) I think it would be prudent to at least try to get an SGA from Cisco, but it looks like Debo is trying to help out with that. -Taylor > On Dec 3, 2015, at 12:33 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on

RE: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 Regards, Brad Kolarov | Managing Partner, B23 LLC | b...@b23.io | 703.957.9155 Original message From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli Date: 12/03/2015 16:39 (GMT-05:00) To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron

Re: Wiki account activation

On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Tony Faustini wrote: Hi, would it be possible to activate my account so I can populate the incubator Wiki with the proposal I sent to this mailing list yesterday? Karma granted, good luck! Nick - To

Re: Wiki account activation

Thanks Nick. Do you know why I get an invalid token overtime I try to reset/change/recover my password? Thanks -Tony > On Dec 3, 2015, at 1:54 PM, Nick Burch wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Tony Faustini wrote: >> Hi, would it be possible to activate my account so I can

Wiki account activation

Hi, would it be possible to activate my account so I can populate the incubator Wiki with the proposal I sent to this mailing list yesterday? Login Name: TonyFaustini Many Thanks -Tony - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 On 12/3/15, 3:30 PM, "Phillip Rhodes" wrote: >+1, assuming no legal issues WRT Cisco. > > >Phil > > >This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM > >On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh < >venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote: > >> +1 (binding). >>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Thanks +Vinod > On Dec 3, 2015, at 9:33 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted > below and is available on the wiki

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (non binding) Would be interested in contributing Š. (from Cisco) debo On 12/3/15, 9:38 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: >+1 (binding) > >On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >> The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

Are any of the GitHub contributors to OpenSoc still at Cisco? That might help. -Alex On 12/3/15, 10:18 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: >On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) >wrote: > >> Would like to know who in Cisco was asked actually. I

Wiki account activiation

Hey all, hope this finds you well. : o) I like to add a new proposal at the incubator wiki and kindly asked for account activation. My username is: mgeiss Cheers *Markus Geiss* Chief Architect RADAR, The Mifos Initiative mge...@mifos.org | Skype: mgeiss.mifos.org | Mobil: +49.152.295.05306 |

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote: > Would like to know who in Cisco was asked actually. I am from Cisco and > can help. Debo, If you can help get an SGA signed that would be great. I don't have any contacts in Cisco, so I didn't have anywhere to

Re: Impala commit policy

On 2 December 2015 at 23:04, Greg Stein wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > > Thanks, Roman. For the record, I don’t plan to contribute to Impala or > > Kudu, and I don’t like strict commit policies such as RTC. But I wanted > to >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

Will find out and get back. debo On 12/3/15, 10:26 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Are any of the GitHub contributors to OpenSoc still at Cisco? That might >help. > >-Alex > >On 12/3/15, 10:18 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > >>On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Debo

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 3, 2015, at 9:33 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted > below and is available on the wiki as

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:58 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > > I think that there was a still pending question of why not ask Cisco for > an > > SGA for cleanliness. > > > The answer that I gave you on

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

I am also working on my contacts to find the right person. On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:34 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I think it would be prudent to at least try to get an SGA from Cisco, but > it looks like Debo is trying to help out with that. > > -Taylor >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I think that there was a still pending question of why not ask Cisco for an > SGA for cleanliness. The answer that I gave you on board@apache was that large corporations don't sign legal documents unless they perceive

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > +1 (binding) > > --Chris Nauroth > > > > > On 12/3/15, 9:33 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > > >The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on > >whether >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

Would like to know who in Cisco was asked actually. I am from Cisco and can help. debo On 12/3/15, 9:39 AM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: >I think that there was a still pending question of why not ask Cisco for >an >SGA for cleanliness. > >The only answer that I heard was that

Re: Impala commit policy

Virtually any project you look at is going to have portions that are fairly complex and portions that are pretty straightforward. In my opinion the correct approach is to identify the parts of the code that a) seem to be most susceptible to bugs, b) are hard to understand well, or c) where

Re: Wiki account activiation

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Markus Geiß wrote: > Hey all, > > hope this finds you well. : o) > > I like to add a new proposal at the incubator wiki and kindly asked for > account activation. > > My username is: mgeiss Done. Marvin Humphrey