Re: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-0.2.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding) Checked md5, sha256 and gpg signatures. Glance through RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE, LICENSE, sampled source code files for LICENSE HEADER. Better to update Apache copyright year to 2016 next time. Daniel On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Thejas Nair wrote: > +1

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

Hi, On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 6:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > ...Can we move freemarker forward to not impede them?.. I'm not sure what you are asking, can you clarify? -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-0.2.0 (RC2)

Thanks for your votes and comments. I'm delighted to announce that this vote passes with the following results: 3 binding +1s: Jean-Baptiste Onofré Thejas Nair Daniel Dai 1 non-binding +1s: Wang Wei We will remove the .sha256 file and update the Copyright to 2016 for the next release.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tempo - A proposal for an enterprise IoT platform

hadrian@minotaur:~$ ls -al Tempo.zip -rw-r--r-- 1 hadrian hadrian 739185 Dec 19 16:45 Tempo.zip Available to anybody who can access the host above. Cheers, Hadrian On 01/14/2016 07:21 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: May I have access to the source code as well? -Taylor On Jan 11, 2016, at

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tempo - A proposal for an enterprise IoT platform

Yes a PostgreSQL adaptor would be great and using Hadoop and Spark is a very natural fit for Tempo. Other Apache projects like Flink be very useful. -Tony > On Jan 14, 2016, at 5:51 PM, Gregory Chase wrote: > > I'd recommend a PostgreSQL adaptor, which opens a huge new

Re: [VOTE] Apache Apex Malhar Release 3.3.0-incubating (RC1)

+1 Carried over vote from dev list. Vlad On 1/12/16 19:35, Thomas Weise wrote: Hi, Please vote on the following Apache Apex Mahar 3.3.0-incubating release candidate. The Apache Apex PPMC has voted to release this candidate. The community vote passed with 4 binding votes from the PPMC

[VOTE] Release Apache Twill-0.7.0-incubating

Hi all, This is to call for a vote on releasing Apache Twill 0.7.0-incubating. This is the eighth release for Twill. Apache Twill is an abstraction over Apache Hadoop YARN that reduces the complexity of developing distributed applications. Vote on twill-dev: http://s.apache.org/qX Result on

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tempo - A proposal for an enterprise IoT platform

Hi Hadrian, we would have no problem with you sharing the Tempo (iota) source code with Taylor. -Tony > On Jan 14, 2016, at 4:21 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > May I have access to the source code as well? > > -Taylor > >> On Jan 11, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tempo - A proposal for an enterprise IoT platform

Oh wait, we didn't say Apache Kafka. That should get this thread another 1000 hits ;-) On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:05 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > Thanks Hadrian! > > -Taylor > > > On Jan 14, 2016, at 8:48 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tempo - A proposal for an enterprise IoT platform

I'd recommend a PostgreSQL adaptor, which opens a huge new world. Of course, if you are Apache and you are IOT, then Hadoop and Spark, and all the streaming analytics technologies are key too. On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Tony Faustini wrote: > Thanks Gregory we look

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tempo - A proposal for an enterprise IoT platform

Thanks Hadrian! -Taylor > On Jan 14, 2016, at 8:48 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > > hadrian@minotaur:~$ ls -al Tempo.zip > -rw-r--r-- 1 hadrian hadrian 739185 Dec 19 16:45 Tempo.zip > > Available to anybody who can access the host above. > > Cheers, > Hadrian > > >> On

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tempo - A proposal for an enterprise IoT platform

Hi Tony, I did rename the proposal page to IotaProposal [1]. Looks like there is enough interest and a lot of positive feedback to move to a vote. If no objection I will start it tomorrow. Cheers, Hadrian [1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IotaProposal On 01/14/2016 05:19 PM, Tony

Re: [VOTE] Apache Apex Malhar Release 3.3.0-incubating (RC1)

Hi, +1 (binding) Carried over from dev list. Everything checks out. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Apex Malhar Release 3.3.0-incubating (RC1)

+1 (binding) Licensing looks good, can build forms source, and the signatures check out. -Taylor > On Jan 12, 2016, at 10:35 PM, Thomas Weise wrote: > > Hi, > > Please vote on the following Apache Apex Mahar 3.3.0-incubating release > candidate. > > The Apache Apex PPMC has

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tempo - A proposal for an enterprise IoT platform

I don't qualify as a "mentor", but plan on seeing me around your community as it develops. This is a very interesting topic for me. Maybe you need a database or two. I know a few ;-) On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Tony Faustini wrote: > Hi Hadrian, I have made the changes

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tempo - A proposal for an enterprise IoT platform

Thanks Gregory we look forward to seeing you around. We currently use MySQL and MongoDB but the data pipeline is written in in a way that any datastore could be used. Thanks -Tony > On Jan 14, 2016, at 3:24 PM, Gregory Chase wrote: > > I don't qualify as a "mentor", but

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Twill-0.7.0-incubating

Forward my vote from dev list: +1 (binding) On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Terence Yim wrote: > Hi all, > > This is to call for a vote on releasing Apache Twill 0.7.0-incubating. > This is the eighth release for Twill. > > Apache Twill is an abstraction over Apache Hadoop

Request for advice on code donation

Hi all, (with my podling member hat on) We have a bit of a problem over in Slider with a code donation. Full details can be found at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLIDER-977 In short, an app-package (a modular chunk of code that Slider runs on Apache Hadoop's YARN ) for Kafka was

Re: Request for advice on code donation

Looks like the repo was placed under the Apache License long before this individual contributed. So, IMO, if you are convinced this individual and his employer knew his contributions were placed under the Apache License you could gamble and accept his contributions. If you get an objection

Re: Request for advice on code donation

Exactly ... just bring the work into the ASF under its ALv2 license. You don't need permission from (all) contributors to use the software under that license. That's *why* we have licenses! Rewriting the headers is a little trickier, though. I'd suggest a two step process: 1) bring in the code,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tempo - A proposal for an enterprise IoT platform

Hadrian, thanks for making the change - starting the voting process would be wonderful. Thanks -Tony > On Jan 14, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > I did rename the proposal page to IotaProposal [1]. > Looks like there is enough interest and a lot

Re: Request for advice on code donation

Ugh, sorry to bring this back again. Apparently my mind was playing tricks on me. We don't have an ICLA from jbnote either. I incorrectly thought I saw him listed at http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html. Josh Elser wrote: Well then, that's an easy resolution :) Thanks, Ross (and

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tempo - A proposal for an enterprise IoT platform

Hi Hadrian, I have made the changes to the Tempo proposal relative to it’s renaming as iota. The changes are in the proposal itself I don’’t think I can rename the top-level project name from Tempo to iota (let me know if I can or should). If anything else needs to be done please let me know.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tempo - A proposal for an enterprise IoT platform

May I have access to the source code as well? -Taylor > On Jan 11, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > > With a bit of delay due to the Holidays season, I think it's time to continue > this thread. > > The code has been available for a while to mentors and those

Re: Request for advice on code donation

How big are the contributions in question? On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Looks like the repo was placed under the Apache License long before this > individual contributed. So, IMO, if you are convinced this individual and > his employer knew his

Re: Request for advice on code donation

Let me dig around in the history and see what I can find. Ted Dunning wrote: How big are the contributions in question? On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Alex Harui wrote: Looks like the repo was placed under the Apache License long before this individual contributed.

RE: Request for advice on code donation

CCLA is optional for ASF -Original Message- From: Josh Elser [mailto:josh.el...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 12:34 PM To: d...@slider.incubator.apache.org Cc: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Request for advice on code donation

Re: Request for advice on code donation

Well then, that's an easy resolution :) Thanks, Ross (and everyone else). I'll just ignore the lack of CCLA and make note of this. Ross Gardler wrote: CCLA is optional for ASF -Original Message- From: Josh Elser [mailto:josh.el...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 12:34 PM

Re: Request for advice on code donation

https://github.com/apache/incubator-slider/pull/3/commits jbnote is the unresponsive party in question. There are a modest number of commits and changes from him. Alex -- that's the thing. Aside from a "I'll get you a CCLA from my employer" 2 months ago, I haven't heard anything from this

Re: DRAFT report January 2016 -- please review

Could someone update wiki ProjectProposals to move OpenMiracle to Milagro? Thanks, Craig > On Jan 11, 2016, at 9:14 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > Incubator PMC report for January 2016 > > The Apache Incubator is the entry path into the ASF for projects and >

[VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.1 (incubating)

Incubator PMC, The Apache Ranger community has voted on and approved the proposal to release Apache Ranger 0.5.1 (incubating). The voting result is available at http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ranger-dev/201601.mbox/%3cab1cffbc-e050-4597-b46c-185d2d4d9...@apache.org%3e.