Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Jan 28, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Best, Markus .:: YAGNI likes a DRY KISS ::. On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:51 AM -0800, "Ashish" wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Regards Krzysztof On 28.01.2016 15:28, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 Supun.. On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > +1 > > Dan > > > > > On Jan 28, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > > > The complete

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding). -Andreas On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:08 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On Jan 28, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > > > The complete

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 Dan > On Jan 28, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thursday, January 28, 2016, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Jan 28, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:02 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:28 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > > > The complete discussion thread

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding). Thanks! On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:19 AM Ted Dunning wrote: > +1 > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:02 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:28 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) --Chris Nauroth On 1/28/16, 6:28 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: >Hi, > >the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > >The complete discussion thread is available here: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

On 1/28/16, 3:26 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: >I prefer Beam ;) I like the name and the logic behind choosing it. Some concerns are that a Google search of "Beam Software" turned up [1] and [2] among others, which might mean that Apache Beam won't work as a TLP name.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 5:31 AM, Adunuthula, Seshu wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On 1/28/16, 12:05 PM, "Julian Hyde" wrote: > > >+1 (binding) > > > >> On Jan 28, 2016, at 10:42 AM, Mayank Bansal wrote: > >> > >> +1

In-Memory Computing Summit 2016

[...not a spam...] In case someone in the incubating projects is interested to participate in the 2nd annual In-Memory Computing Summit in San Francisco, the CFP is still going until Feb 3rd The call for speaking proposals for the In-Memory Computing Summit 2016

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

As a regular english word, "beam" cannot be trademarked, by others/us. Yet the *pair* of words, "Apache Beam" can be implicitly/explicitly trademarked. On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 1/28/16, 3:26 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré"

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+ 1 (non-binding), and cool name! On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 5:31 AM, Adunuthula, Seshu > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On 1/28/16, 12:05 PM, "Julian Hyde"

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding). On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Gregory Chase wrote: > + 1 (non-binding), and cool name! > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 5:31 AM, Adunuthula, Seshu

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

On Jan 28, 2016 6:28 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: > > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Jan 28, 2016, at 10:42 AM, Mayank Bansal wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Mayank > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh < > venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote: > >> +1 (binding). >> >> Thanks! >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:19

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On 1/28/16, 12:05 PM, "Julian Hyde" wrote: >+1 (binding) > >> On Jan 28, 2016, at 10:42 AM, Mayank Bansal wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks, >> Mayank >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh < >>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Man, congrats on a job fantastically well done. This is ASF incubator participation at its best. Expectations are high now. I am looking forward to exemplary governance and speedy graduation. Best of luck, Hadrian On 01/28/2016 09:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi, the

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > As a regular english word, "beam" cannot be trademarked, by others/us. Like Windows® or Apple®? Doug - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Thanks Naresh On 29 Jan 2016 06:18, "Hadrian Zbarcea" wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Man, congrats on a job fantastically well done. This is ASF incubator > participation at its best. > > Expectations are high now. I am looking forward to exemplary governance >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

LOL ;) Regards JB On 01/28/2016 01:00 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: Hi Bertrand, Your suggested name only has an entropy of 0.19153. You may consider adding a special character or two :). To standardize (every company seems to like this lately) we may consider using SHA-256 for our project

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Serge Huber wrote: > ...Please ignore my last message, I missed the fact that a project was > already existing > with the name “Arrow”... Hehe, that's the risk when using common names, with about 200 projects here. Naming your project

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

On a lighter side… Just to mess with you guys if you’re looking at an alternative name I might suggest : Apache Arrow I thought of this because I was thinking of how an arrow flows through the air, might be deviated, and it also associates with something sharp, dangerous and fast :) And of

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 6:22 PM, James Malone wrote: > ...To that end, the name we propose to use is: > > Apache Beam The name sounds good to me and it's indeed a good idea to set it now. -Bertrand

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Please ignore my last message, I missed the fact that a project was already existing with the name “Arrow”. cheers, Serge… > On 28 janv. 2016, at 11:01, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 6:22 PM, James Malone >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

I prefer Beam ;) Regards JB On 01/28/2016 12:25 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Serge Huber wrote: ...Please ignore my last message, I missed the fact that a project was already existing with the name “Arrow”... Hehe, that's the risk when

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hi Bertrand, Your suggested name only has an entropy of 0.19153. You may consider adding a special character or two :). To standardize (every company seems to like this lately) we may consider using SHA-256 for our project names. Being of fixed length it will help Sally in her templates for

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:28 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Mayank On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh < venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote: > +1 (binding). > > Thanks! > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:19 AM Ted Dunning > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:02 AM, John

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > As a regular english word, "beam" cannot be trademarked, by others/us. > > Like Windows® or Apple®? oh, snap. True. Hrm. Given that, I'm

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1(non-binding) - Tsuyoshi On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Johan Edstrom wrote: > +1 > >> On Jan 28, 2016, at 6:34 PM, Naresh Agarwal wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks >> Naresh >> On 29 Jan 2016 06:18, "Hadrian Zbarcea"

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Hao On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote: > +1 > > > On Jan 28, 2016, at 6:34 PM, Naresh Agarwal > wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks > > Naresh > > On 29 Jan 2016 06:18, "Hadrian Zbarcea"

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

> On 28 Jan 16, at 21:47, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >>> As a regular english word, "beam" cannot be trademarked, by others/us. >>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Friday, January 29, 2016, Adunuthula, Seshu wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On 1/28/16, 12:05 PM, "Julian Hyde" > > wrote: > > >+1 (binding) > > > >> On Jan 28, 2016, at 10:42 AM, Mayank Bansal

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (Binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

> [X] +1 - accept Apache Beam as a new incubating project -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 > On Jan 28, 2016, at 6:34 PM, Naresh Agarwal wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks > Naresh > On 29 Jan 2016 06:18, "Hadrian Zbarcea" wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Man, congrats on a job fantastically well done. This is ASF incubator >>

[VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

Hi, the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. The complete discussion thread is available here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201601.mbox/%3CCA%2B%3DKJmvj4wyosNTXVpnsH8PhS7jEyzkZngc682rGgZ3p28L42Q%40mail.gmail.com%3E As reminder the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

Here's my +1 of course. Regards JB On 01/28/2016 03:28 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi, the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. The complete discussion thread is available here:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+ 1 (binding). Suresh > On Jan 28, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 Thanks Prasanth > On Jan 28, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Supun Kamburugamuva wrote: > > +1 > > Supun.. > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Dan >> >> >> >>> On Jan 28, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. >> >> The complete

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Sergio Fernández > wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) > On 28 Jan 2016, at 15:59, Alexander Bezzubov wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Sergio Fernández >> wrote:

February 2016 report timeline

February 2016 Incubator report timeline: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2016 Wed February 03 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun February 07 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun February 07 -- Summary due by end of day Tue February 09 -- Mentor signoff due