Re: [VOTE] Accept Joshua as an Apache Incubator Podling

2016-02-01 16:20 GMT+01:00 Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov>: > Hey Jim, > > This is a valid concern, one that I hope is mediated by taking > however long it takes in Incubation to attract some new committers > to work on the project. Hopefully too you saw how long I took

Re: [VOTE] Accept Guacamole into the Apache incubator

+1 (binding) > On Feb 2, 2016, at 10:05 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi, > > The Guacamole proposal was discussed couple of weeks ago. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Guacamole into the Apache incubator

+1 (binding) > On Feb 2, 2016, at 10:03 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Erf, sorry about that: > > Please cast your vote to: > [] +1 - accept Apache Guacamole as a new incubating project > [] 0 - not sure > [] -1 - do not accept the Apache Guacamole project (because:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Joshua as an Apache Incubator Podling

+1 (binding) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

Hi, > NOTICE contains copyright, commons-io [2] It’s my understanding that for an ASF produced product with the name, copyright and “this software produced at the ASF” that nothing needs to be added to notice. > NOTICE contains copyright and a few other declarations, log4j2 [3] Drop the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

Hi, Changing my vote to +1 binding. > As I mentioned in my other response, thanks for the great feedback and quick > turnaround! I filed JIRA’s based on the issues you noted below. No problem, thanks for raising the JIRA’s quickly. >> This file [12] incorrectly has an Apache header and is

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

Hi, > Speaking from the NiFi side I can assure you an enormous amount of > time, energy, and communication go into LICENSE and NOTICE handling > for this project. Sorry if you thought my message applied otherwise, there’s certainly no harm intended. I was just pointing out (with some

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

I already reviewed the release and voted +1 on dev@geode, but just wanted to ensure that my vote was also counted here. +1 (binding) Niall On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > Hello, > > This is a call for a vote on the Apache Geode (incubating) release >

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.9.0-incubating (RC3)

Thanks for the thorough review, we will definitely look into all these issues for the next release. Anyone else willing to review ? We still need at least one more vote. On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding) but only if LICENSE is

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

Justin, Speaking from the NiFi side I can assure you an enormous amount of time, energy, and communication go into LICENSE and NOTICE handling for this project. We've had discussions with PMC and committers of other projects to learn their approach as well as to encourage them to follow these

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

Hi It seems that some of the confusion comes from what top level projects have done and not keep up with policy? From a 5 minute search (and not to pick on / point out any particular project) here’s some examples were I think improvement could be made to NOTICE files. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

HI, > [4] https://nifi.apache.org/licensing-guide.html > BTW nicely put together, it's well worth a read and clearly explains quite tricky LICENSE and NOTICE issues. Thanks, Justin

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi > > It seems that some of the confusion comes from what top level projects have > done and not keep up with policy? > From a 5 minute search (and not to pick on / point out any particular > project) here’s some

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

I can see how a TLP would not be receptive to someone nit-picking their LICENSE/NOTICE files. Asking for patches, as Marvin suggests, is one approach that might work. Another approach is for someone with expertise in licensing to approach a TLP and offer to take them through a licensing review.

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Perhaps it's time to ask TLP to review their LICENCE / NOTICE to be a little > more consistent with current policy? I approached a bunch of Lucene PMC members about this at ApacheCon a couple years back and they were

Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

Justin, once again -- thank you so much for your diligent reviews! Wrt. NOTICE/LICENSE files can you please take a look at this and see if that's acceptable: https://github.com/rvs/incubator-hawq/blob/master/LICENSE https://github.com/rvs/incubator-hawq/blob/master/NOTICE Wrt. crypto code

Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 7:00 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > So should we cancel this vote and wait for a new RC? Yup. Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

+0 for now but if someone wants to give some tips I'd be happy to change to a +1 Everything checks out, but when building the source package, it fails here :gemfire-core:test com.gemstone.gemfire.distributed.LocatorLauncherJUnitTest > testSetBindAddressToUnknownHost FAILED

Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

So should we cancel this vote and wait for a new RC? On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:56 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Justin, > > once again -- thank you so much for your diligent reviews! Wrt. > NOTICE/LICENSE files > can you please take a look at this and see if that's

Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

Hi, > can you please take a look at this and see if that's acceptable: > https://github.com/rvs/incubator-hawq/blob/master/LICENSE > https://github.com/rvs/incubator-hawq/blob/master/NOTICE > Quick look looks much better but I’ve

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

Hi, > We can let the Board know that poor TLP compliance with Apache licensing > policy is complicating our work in the Incubator +1 to that it makes reviewing releases a lot harder. Recently a few release candidates have waited too long for a vote here and that may be a factor. Some

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > Hello, > > This is a call for a vote on the Apache Geode (incubating) release > 1.0.0-incubating.M1. > > This release candidate, 1.0.0-incubating.M1.RC2, has successfully passed a > vote for a release on the geode

Re: [VOTE] Accept Joshua as an Apache Incubator Podling

+1 (binding) Accept Joshua as an Apache Incubator podling. D > On Jan 30, 2016, at 12:00 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) > wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > OK the discussion is now completed. Please VOTE to accept Joshua > into the Apache Incubator. I’ll leave the

Re: New ASF visual identity

+1 On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:51 AM, wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Markus > > > > > > .:: YAGNI likes a DRY KISS ::. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 3,

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

Hi, I took a look at all the LICENSE, NOTCE and DISCLAIMER files in the non documentation / non web site github repos of all incubating projects. I was assisted by scripts and make a few assumptions for expediency so may of missed a couple/included a graduated or retired project. Some data

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

Hi John, Thanks for testing it out and reporting the test failure. The error is not expected based on previous testing but it’s great to get results from different environments. You don’t happen to have an entry for ‘badhostname.badcompany.bad’ in /etc/hosts by chance? The test is expecting

Re: New ASF visual identity

Saw it in action at FOSDEM - looks great. However, the old style is now a collector's item :) -Greg On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Wed,

New ASF visual identity

Greets, The ASF has a new look: https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_announces86 https://www.apache.org/foundation/press/kit/ The main Incubator website needs to be updated with the new visual identity, as do podling websites. I volunteer to create a drop-in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

Justin, Thanks for the great feedback! Regarding the NOTICE in the binary distribution: the contents came directly from NOTICE files contained in bundled dependencies included in the distribution. I’m sure I don’t completely understand the requirements yet [1] so thanks for any

Re: [VOTE] Accept Guacamole into the Apache incubator

And my axe!..I mean, +1 (binding)! With regards, Daniel. On 02/03/2016 06:38 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Of course my +1 (binding) ;) > > Regards > JB > > On 02/02/2016 04:05 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The Guacamole proposal was discussed couple of weeks ago. >> >> The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

Hi Justin, As I mentioned in my other response, thanks for the great feedback and quick turnaround! I filed JIRA’s based on the issues you noted below. Anthony > On Feb 2, 2016, at 10:06 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > +0.5 for the license issues and unable

Re: New ASF visual identity

+1 On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:51 AM, wrote: > > > +1 > > > Best, > > > Markus > > > .:: YAGNI likes a DRY KISS ::. > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:07 AM -0800, "Marvin Humphrey" < > mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > > > > > > Greets, > > The ASF has a new look: > > >

Ideas regarding System and network programming projects

Hi all, I am a student of an engineering college in India.This year in my college we have the option to work on any open source project for credits. Each group of students(3-4) would have 4 months to work on it and the project should be using network programming or networking. With GSOC around

Re: [VOTE] Accept Guacamole into the Apache incubator

Of course my +1 (binding) ;) Regards JB On 02/02/2016 04:05 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi, The Guacamole proposal was discussed couple of weeks ago. The complete discussion thread is available here:

Re: New ASF visual identity

+1 Best, Markus .:: YAGNI likes a DRY KISS ::. On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:07 AM -0800, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote: Greets, The ASF has a new look: https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_announces86