On 2/6/16, 8:29 AM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
>
>So the question is, what parts of NOTICE pertaining to Apache projects
>must we
>propagate, and what portions can we omit? I'd say that the name of the
>Apache
>project and the copyright statement ought to be bubbled up.
>
>And this interpretatio
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> The main Incubator website needs to be updated with the new visual
> identity, as do podling websites.
>
> I volunteer to create a drop-in replacement for the egg logo:
The updated logo is now available:
http://incubator.apache.org/ima
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> dropping the DOAP file of a retired incubator project means removing the
> project from projects list [1]: it seems reasonable
> there is one task to do: remove the entry from projects DOAP files list [2]
Thanks, Hervé! That's nice and str
Hi,
Here what I worked out needs to be added to LICENSE and NOTICE for each type of
bundled license.
Bundled Code licenseLICENSE NOTICE
Apache 1.1 Y Y Not
sure what need to be added to NOTICE here
ASF Apache 2.0 N
Hi,
>> It is not necessary to duplicate the line "This product includes software
>> developed at the Apache Software Foundation...", though the ASF copyright
>> line and any other portions of NOTICE must be considered for propagation.
I’m also not sure that that agrees with this [1] + [2],
Hi,
>It is not necessary to duplicate the line "This product includes software
>developed at the Apache Software Foundation...", though the ASF copyright
>line and any other portions of NOTICE must be considered for propagation.
Which seem a a little unclear, consider to me mean it ma
Let me reiterate my +1 (binding) vote here...
Anyone else willing to review the release ?
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache
> SystemML version 0.9.0!
>
> The PPMC vote thread:
>
> https://www.mail-arc
dropping the DOAP file of a retired incubator project means removing the
project from projects list [1]: it seems reasonable
there is one task to do: remove the entry from projects DOAP files list [2]
notice that this step has to be done only when a project has previously made
the effort to cre
(sorry, I'm a little late in the discussion...)
no, DOAP was not retired
I tried to makes things simpler in the documentation:
https://projects.apache.org/about.html
Regards,
Hervé
Le dimanche 31 janvier 2016 22:00:18 John D. Ament a écrit :
> I believe doap was retired in the projects-new setu
Congratulations on the first official release!
This email encrypted by tiny buttons & fat thumbs, beta voice recognition, and
autocorrect on my iPhone.
> On Feb 6, 2016, at 8:31 AM, Nitin Lamba wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> Here are the results of the vote for releasing Apache Geode (incubating)
Ah, I see the third +1 from Roman now.
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:52 AM John D. Ament wrote:
> Its customary for the result to include the names of who voted, for
> example I only see 2 +1's on the incubator list (but maybe I'm not seeing
> the email properly). In addition, since I'm an IPMC mem
Its customary for the result to include the names of who voted, for example
I only see 2 +1's on the incubator list (but maybe I'm not seeing the email
properly). In addition, since I'm an IPMC member my +0 is binding (not
sure why you listed as 0 binding).
John
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:31 AM N
Christopher wrote on 2/4/16 7:25 PM:
> It might be relevant that that both of those tools appear to be licensed
> under ASL 2.0, which explicitly permits redistribution (presumably outside
> the private area?). I would think it confusing to have an open source
> license on software which is expecte
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: badHostName.badCompany.com
Address: 92.242.140.21
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:34 AM Dan Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Anthony Baker wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Thanks for testing it out and reporting the test failure. The error is
> > not ex
Hello,
Here are the results of the vote for releasing Apache Geode (incubating)
release 1.0.0-incubating.M1 (RC2):
+1 votes: 3 (3 binding)
+0 votes: 1 (0 binding)
-1 votes: 0 (0 binding)
The vote has succeeded - the release will now be completed.
Nitin (on behalf of the Geode team)
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> I'm helping out the AsterixDB podling assembling a first release with
> bundled binaries, and one of the advises I've given is that:
>
> For bundled ASF artifacts you need to merge (at least) their name and
> copyright year statement, to be co
I'm helping out the AsterixDB podling assembling a first release with bundled
binaries, and one of the advises I've given is that:
For bundled ASF artifacts you need to merge (at least) their name and
copyright year statement, to be compliant with ASL 2.0, section 4.d [1]
However Justin (se
Hi all,
I'm one of the "semi-active mentors" of Taverna. In my case, I have a
new $job, which is related to some Apache communities but not Taverna.
A new job is a busy time so I'm really not able to properly support the
podling at the moment. I wish I could but I also have to be realistic.
18 matches
Mail list logo