Re: Final report?

2016-03-09 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > >... > > To be clear: it was emailed to the Board on Feb 28. ... so we technically > > "have" it. But it does need to be in the agenda before it is

Re: Final report?

2016-03-09 Thread Sam Ruby
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:24 PM, John D. Ament >> wrote: >> > * Graduations >> > >> > The board has motions for the

Re: Final report?

2016-03-09 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:24 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > * Graduations > > > > The board has motions for the following: > > > > - Sentry > > Not... yet. :-) > > Does somebody intend to post

Re: Final report?

2016-03-09 Thread Sam Ruby
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:24 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > * Graduations > > The board has motions for the following: > > - Sentry Not... yet. :-) Does somebody intend to post this to the agenda? - Sam Ruby

Re: Final report?

2016-03-09 Thread Greg Stein
As an ASF Member, you should have karma. ... and I see you discovered that, and already committed the report :-) On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:09 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > its generally preferable to just wait until next month, to give others time > to review. > > With that

Re: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF

2016-03-09 Thread Sam Ruby
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > >>> Agreed. Sebb's recommendation, AIUI, was to simply mention in LICENSE >>> that there is a non-ASF AL bundle without copying the entire LICENSE. > > That’s what I was objecting to. LICENSE is for licenses. If

Re: Final report?

2016-03-09 Thread John D. Ament
its generally preferable to just wait until next month, to give others time to review. With that said, it looks like Atlas is in. Can someone w/ proper karma submit the report? John On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:21 PM Seetharam Venkatesh wrote: > I'm adding the report for

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9alpha-rc2

2016-03-09 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 on the assumption that future release will fix up the header situation I checked: - signatures good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE is missing some BSD licensed software - NOTICE contains too many copyright lines, copyright lines should not be in NOTICE unless they are from relocated

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2

2016-03-09 Thread Jean-Daniel Cryans
Hi, The voting period is now closed. The vote passes with: 3 binding +1s (Todd L, Michael S, Justin M) 0 binding -1s Thanks to everyone who tried the release and voted. Looks like we have a few more license-related things to tweak, we'll try to get that done for 0.8.0 (which I'm RMing) in