+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 03/25/2016 12:07 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
Hi all,
The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal
to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating.
PPMC Vote Call:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201603.mbox/%3C42
+1 (non-binding)
Max
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Hitesh Shah wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> — HItesh
>
> On Mar 24, 2016, at 8:00 PM, Siddharth Anand
> wrote:
>
> > Following the discussion earlier:
> >https://s.apache.org/AirflowDiscussion
> >
> > I would like to call a VOTE for acceptin
+1 (binding)
— HItesh
On Mar 24, 2016, at 8:00 PM, Siddharth Anand wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier:
>https://s.apache.org/AirflowDiscussion
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Airflow as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.
+ 1 (binding)
All the best,
Venkatesh
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:06 PM Jakob Homan wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -jakob
>
> > On Mar 24, 2016, at 8:20 PM, Chris Riccomini
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 non-binding :)
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Siddharth Anand
>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Following th
+1 (binding)
-jakob
> On Mar 24, 2016, at 8:20 PM, Chris Riccomini wrote:
>
> +1 non-binding :)
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Siddharth Anand
> wrote:
>
>> Following the discussion earlier:
>>https://s.apache.org/AirflowDiscussion
>>
>> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting
+1 non-binding :)
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Siddharth Anand
wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier:
> https://s.apache.org/AirflowDiscussion
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Airflow as a new incubator
> project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.o
Following the discussion earlier:
https://s.apache.org/AirflowDiscussion
I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Airflow as a new incubator project.
The proposal is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AirflowProposal
The proposal is also included at the bottom of this email.
V
Done. `xtang` added to `hudson-jobadmin`.
Marvin Humphrey
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:18 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Technically, any VP on this mailing list can grant such a request if they
> feel so empowered.
>
> John
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:27 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> Ted,
>>
>>
Technically, any VP on this mailing list can grant such a request if they
feel so empowered.
John
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:27 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Ted,
>
> seems like INFRA is deferring back to you:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11540
>
> Would appreciate you doing
Copying my +1 (binding) vote from the dev@ list here.
Release contents look good.
John
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:07 PM Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal
> to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating.
>
> PPMC Vote Call:
>
Ted,
seems like INFRA is deferring back to you:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11540
Would appreciate you doing it soon.
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For add
Hi all,
The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal
to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating.
PPMC Vote Call:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201603.mbox/%3C425840806.20160321000209%40freemail.hu%3E
PPMC Vote Result:
http://mail-ar
+1 (binding)
-Taylor
> On Mar 23, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:
>
> Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Omid as
> a new Incubator project.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Omid into the Incubator
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Omid
> [ ] -1 Do not accept Omid becau
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Omid as
> a new Incubator project.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Omid into the Incubator
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Omid
> [ ] -1 Do not accept Omid because ...
>
>
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:34 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:25 PM Jakob Homan wrote:
>
>> So, it's been a week with no objections. Craig's concern could also
>> be addressed by allowing Officers to join the IPMC in the same way
>> that Members can.
>>
>> I'd like to see th
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:25 PM Jakob Homan wrote:
> So, it's been a week with no objections. Craig's concern could also
> be addressed by allowing Officers to join the IPMC in the same way
> that Members can.
>
> I'd like to see this question resolved so that we progress the
> Airflow proposal
So, it's been a week with no objections. Craig's concern could also
be addressed by allowing Officers to join the IPMC in the same way
that Members can.
I'd like to see this question resolved so that we progress the
Airflow proposal to a vote with Chris Riccomini as Champion (VP of
Samza). He'd
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 4:18 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> If you want to simplify policy, get rid of the champion. Or rather, reduce
> the champion’s role to nominating a project for incubation. Once the project
> has entered incubation, the champion’s role ends.
>
++1 on removing the role total
+1 (binding)
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 4:48 PM, Christopher Collins wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The Apache Mynewt Incubator PPMC has approved a proposal to release
> Release Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-b2-incubating-rc3. We now kindly request
> that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
