Re: [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

2016-03-24 Thread Seetharam Venkatesh
+ 1 (binding) All the best, Venkatesh On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:06 PM Jakob Homan wrote: > +1 (binding) > > -jakob > > > On Mar 24, 2016, at 8:20 PM, Chris Riccomini > wrote: > > > > +1 non-binding :) > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:00 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

2016-03-24 Thread Jakob Homan
+1 (binding) -jakob > On Mar 24, 2016, at 8:20 PM, Chris Riccomini wrote: > > +1 non-binding :) > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Siddharth Anand > wrote: > >> Following the discussion earlier: >>https://s.apache.org/AirflowDiscussion

Re: [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

2016-03-24 Thread Chris Riccomini
+1 non-binding :) On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Siddharth Anand wrote: > Following the discussion earlier: > https://s.apache.org/AirflowDiscussion > > I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Airflow as a new incubator > project. > > The proposal is available

[VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

2016-03-24 Thread Siddharth Anand
Following the discussion earlier: https://s.apache.org/AirflowDiscussion I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Airflow as a new incubator project. The proposal is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AirflowProposal The proposal is also included at the bottom of this email.

Re: Enable one more PPMC member of MADlib to be able to manage Jenkins builds

2016-03-24 Thread Marvin Humphrey
Done. `xtang` added to `hudson-jobadmin`. Marvin Humphrey On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:18 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Technically, any VP on this mailing list can grant such a request if they > feel so empowered. > > John > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:27 PM Roman Shaposhnik

Re: Enable one more PPMC member of MADlib to be able to manage Jenkins builds

2016-03-24 Thread John D. Ament
Technically, any VP on this mailing list can grant such a request if they feel so empowered. John On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:27 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Ted, > > seems like INFRA is deferring back to you: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11540 > > Would

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

2016-03-24 Thread John D. Ament
Copying my +1 (binding) vote from the dev@ list here. Release contents look good. John On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:07 PM Daniel Dekany wrote: > Hi all, > > The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal > to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating.

Enable one more PPMC member of MADlib to be able to manage Jenkins builds

2016-03-24 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
Ted, seems like INFRA is deferring back to you: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11540 Would appreciate you doing it soon. Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

[VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

2016-03-24 Thread Daniel Dekany
Hi all, The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating. PPMC Vote Call: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201603.mbox/%3C425840806.20160321000209%40freemail.hu%3E PPMC Vote Result:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Omid into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-24 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Mar 23, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: > > Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Omid as > a new Incubator project. > > [ ] +1 Accept Omid into the Incubator > [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Omid > [ ] -1 Do

Re: [VOTE] Accept Omid into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-24 Thread Andrew Purtell
+1 (binding) On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: > Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Omid as > a new Incubator project. > > [ ] +1 Accept Omid into the Incubator > [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Omid > [ ] -1 Do not accept

Re: Allowed Champions on podlings

2016-03-24 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:34 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:25 PM Jakob Homan wrote: > >> So, it's been a week with no objections. Craig's concern could also >> be addressed by allowing Officers to join the IPMC in the same way >>

Re: Allowed Champions on podlings

2016-03-24 Thread John D. Ament
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:25 PM Jakob Homan wrote: > So, it's been a week with no objections. Craig's concern could also > be addressed by allowing Officers to join the IPMC in the same way > that Members can. > > I'd like to see this question resolved so that we progress

Re: Allowed Champions on podlings

2016-03-24 Thread Jakob Homan
So, it's been a week with no objections. Craig's concern could also be addressed by allowing Officers to join the IPMC in the same way that Members can. I'd like to see this question resolved so that we progress the Airflow proposal to a vote with Chris Riccomini as Champion (VP of Samza).

Re: Policy should be simple (was "Allowed Champions on podlings")

2016-03-24 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 4:18 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > If you want to simplify policy, get rid of the champion. Or rather, reduce > the champion’s role to nominating a project for incubation. Once the project > has entered incubation, the champion’s role ends. > ++1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-b2-incubating-rc3

2016-03-24 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1 (binding) > On Mar 22, 2016, at 4:48 PM, Christopher Collins wrote: > > Hello, > > The Apache Mynewt Incubator PPMC has approved a proposal to release > Release Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-b2-incubating-rc3. We now kindly request > that the Incubator PMC members review and