Re: [VOTE] Release Eagle Version 0.3.0 RC3 (Incubating)

2016-03-28 Thread Zhao Qingwen
+1 (Binding) Best Regards, Qingwen Zhao | 赵晴雯 2016-03-29 13:44 GMT+08:00 Henry Saputra : > Sig file looks good > Hash files look good > NOTICE file exist > LICENSE file exist > DISCLAIMER file exist > No 3rd party exe in source artifact > > +1 (binding) > > - Henry

Re: [VOTE] Release Eagle Version 0.3.0 RC3 (Incubating)

2016-03-28 Thread Henry Saputra
Sig file looks good Hash files look good NOTICE file exist LICENSE file exist DISCLAIMER file exist No 3rd party exe in source artifact +1 (binding) - Henry > > On Mar 28, 2016, at 5:05 PM, Dendukuri, Hemanth > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > The Apache Eagle

Re: [VOTE] Release Eagle Version 0.3.0 RC3 (Incubating)

2016-03-28 Thread Hao Chen
Forwarding my vote from dev: +1 (binding) - Hao On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Amareshwari Sriramdasu < amareshw...@apache.org> wrote: > Replaying my vote from dev list : > > +1 (Binding) > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Dendukuri, Hemanth > wrote: > > > Hi all, > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Eagle Version 0.3.0 RC3 (Incubating)

2016-03-28 Thread Amareshwari Sriramdasu
Replaying my vote from dev list : +1 (Binding) On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Dendukuri, Hemanth wrote: > Hi all, > >The Apache Eagle community has voted on and approved the proposal > to release "Apache Eagle 0.3.0 Release Candidate 3 (incubating)". >The

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apex from the Incubator

2016-03-28 Thread David Yan
+1 Thanks, David On 2016-03-28 14:46, Pramod Immaneni wrote: > Sorry missed including the resolution. Here is the full email again..> > > The Apache Apex community has discussed and voted on graduation to top> > level project.> > The vote passed with 42 1 votes (12

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-28 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal > and the feedback so far seems to be positive. > > Please vote to accept Quickstep into the

Re: [VOTE] Release Eagle Version 0.3.0 RC3 (Incubating)

2016-03-28 Thread Julian Hyde
Forwarding my vote from dev: +1 (binding) Julian > On Mar 28, 2016, at 5:05 PM, Dendukuri, Hemanth wrote: > > Hi all, > > The Apache Eagle community has voted on and approved the proposal to > release "Apache Eagle 0.3.0 Release Candidate 3 (incubating)". >

[VOTE] Release Eagle Version 0.3.0 RC3 (Incubating)

2016-03-28 Thread Dendukuri, Hemanth
Hi all, The Apache Eagle community has voted on and approved the proposal to release "Apache Eagle 0.3.0 Release Candidate 3 (incubating)". The voting result is available at https://s.apache.org/eagle-0.3.0-result The Source file to be voted are located here:

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apex from the Incubator

2016-03-28 Thread Alan Gates
+1. Alan. > On Mar 28, 2016, at 14:46, Pramod Immaneni wrote: > > Sorry missed including the resolution. Here is the full email again.. > > The Apache Apex community has discussed and voted on graduation to top > level project. > The vote passed with 42 +1 votes (12

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apex from the Incubator

2016-03-28 Thread Thomas Weise
+1 Thanks, Thomas On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Pramod Immaneni wrote: > Sorry missed including the resolution. Here is the full email again.. > > The Apache Apex community has discussed and voted on graduation to top > level project. > The vote passed with 42 +1

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apex from the Incubator

2016-03-28 Thread Pramod Immaneni
Sorry missed including the resolution. Here is the full email again.. The Apache Apex community has discussed and voted on graduation to top level project. The vote passed with 42 +1 votes (12 from the PPMC) and no 0 or -1 votes. Maturity Assessment:http://apex.incubator.apache.org/maturity.html

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apex from the Incubator

2016-03-28 Thread Ted Dunning
There hasn't been a discussion thread here on the general list, but I am still prepared to vote in favor of this. +1 See! I just did. On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Pramod Immaneni wrote: > The Apache Apex community has discussed and voted on graduation to top > level

[VOTE] Graduate Apex from the Incubator

2016-03-28 Thread Pramod Immaneni
The Apache Apex community has discussed and voted on graduation to top level project. The vote passed with 42 +1 votes (12 from the PPMC) and no 0 or -1 votes. Maturity Assessment: http://apex.incubator.apache.org/maturity.html Discussion: https://s.apache.org/qrvY Vote: https://s.apache.org/R8MR

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-28 Thread Julian Hyde
+1 (binding) > On Mar 28, 2016, at 11:50 AM, Rahul Iyer wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > ​ > > >>> Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator. >>> The vote will be open until Mon 3/28 noon PST. >>> >>> [ ] +1 Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator >>>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-28 Thread Rahul Iyer
+1 (non-binding) ​ > > Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator. > > The vote will be open until Mon 3/28 noon PST. > > > > [ ] +1 Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator > > [ ] +0 Abstain > > [ ] -1 Don't accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator because ... > > ​ > >

Re: 54 podlings - too many?

2016-03-28 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:44 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > We're currently at 54 podlings in the incubator. I feel like that's a > lot. Anyone else have any concerns with so many podlings? I really encourage everybody to read the feedback on the last year's attempt

ODF Toolkit Podling (was RE: 54 podlings - too many?)

2016-03-28 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Since I came to OpenOffice and Apache via my work on ODF at OASIS, I have some interest in this topic. I share Sam Ruby's bafflement. Sustainability of a single committer curating the code base is certainly a concern. In November 2015, mentor Nick Burch challenged the podling with the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Omid into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-28 Thread Daniel Dai
With 11 binding +1s (Chris Nauroth, James Taylor, Flavio Junqueira, Julian Hyde, Chris Douglas, Amol Kekre, Josh Elser, Andrew Purtell, P. Taylor Goetz, Suresh Marru and Daniel Dai), the vote passes. Thanks everyone for taking time to vote. I will proceed with next steps. Thanks, Daniel On Fri,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-28 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal > and the feedback so far seems to be positive. > > Please vote to accept Quickstep into the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-28 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
+1 [binding] On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 02:01PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal > and the feedback so far seems to be positive. > > Please vote to accept Quickstep into the

Re: 54 podlings - too many?

2016-03-28 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
There was also some discussion of maybe bringing the code into Apache Tika - we would be happy to have a discussion on dev@tika if it made sense RE: ODF Toolkit. ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and

Re: 54 podlings - too many?

2016-03-28 Thread Sam Ruby
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Harbs wrote: > What about recommending that it be adopted by OpenOffice? > > IIUC, ODF Toolkit predates OpenOffice becoming an Apache Project. It seems > (to an outsider like me) like the OpenOffice community would be a good home > for a

Re: 54 podlings - too many?

2016-03-28 Thread Harbs
What about recommending that it be adopted by OpenOffice? IIUC, ODF Toolkit predates OpenOffice becoming an Apache Project. It seems (to an outsider like me) like the OpenOffice community would be a good home for a related toolkit. Harbs On Mar 28, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Sam Ruby

Re: 54 podlings - too many?

2016-03-28 Thread Sam Ruby
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:36 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:33 AM Sam Ruby wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:44 AM, John D. Ament >> wrote: >> > Both great ideas. Thanksfully, Whimsy helps a bit on

Re: 54 podlings - too many?

2016-03-28 Thread John D. Ament
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:33 AM Sam Ruby wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:44 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > Both great ideas. Thanksfully, Whimsy helps a bit on the age part > > > > https://whimsy.apache.org/incubator/podlings/by-age > > > > It

Re: 54 podlings - too many?

2016-03-28 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> We're currently at 54 podlings in the incubator. > > A more use stat would perhaps to see: > a) How long they have been in incubation? > b) How many releases have they made? > > May be easier to then target one

Re: 54 podlings - too many?

2016-03-28 Thread Sam Ruby
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:44 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Both great ideas. Thanksfully, Whimsy helps a bit on the age part > > https://whimsy.apache.org/incubator/podlings/by-age > > It also gives a clean dashboard to display who the mentors are, etc. Is it > possible we

Re: 54 podlings - too many?

2016-03-28 Thread John D. Ament
Both great ideas. Thanksfully, Whimsy helps a bit on the age part https://whimsy.apache.org/incubator/podlings/by-age It also gives a clean dashboard to display who the mentors are, etc. Is it possible we can have the mentors of each project give this feedback in an objective manner? John On

Re: 54 podlings - too many?

2016-03-28 Thread Michael Fitzner
> Am 28.03.2016 um 07:59 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Add > Onofré : > > Hi, > > I agree with Justin. > > Maybe, we should do kind of audit: > - are the podlings actually active (commits, messages on the mailing list, > releases, etc) ? > - for how long are they in the incubator

Re: 54 podlings - too many?

2016-03-28 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi, I agree with Justin. Maybe, we should do kind of audit: - are the podlings actually active (commits, messages on the mailing list, releases, etc) ? - for how long are they in the incubator ? - how far are they from graduation ? We can spread this work with "buckets" assigned to volunteer