[VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. ### PROPOSAL BELOW ### Abstract Pony Mail is a mail-archiving, archive

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards JB On 05/24/2016 12:22 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator. Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PredictionIO ​[ ] +1 Accept

Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

Hi, +1, I asked to the current contributors to review and check all code in order to cleanup and identify "used/inspired/derived" code. On the other hand, I also said to Liang that a SGA will be required. I think we can start a vote and address the code cleanup in the mean time. Regards JB

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

Hi all, After being open for over 72 hours, the vote for releasing Apache Tephra 0.8.0-incubating passed with 3 binding +1s and a +0 and no -1. Binding +1s: James Taylor Justin Mclean Lars Hofhansl +0: John D. Ament A couple of issues we need to work on - 1. Justin suggested adding license

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) great to see it coming to ASF On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:20 PM, moon soo Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:23 PM Andrew Purtell > wrote: > > > Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:23 PM Andrew Purtell wrote: > Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like > to call a VOTE > on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator. > > Proposal:

RE: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator -Original Message- From: Andrew Purtell [mailto:apurt...@apache.org] Sent: 24 May 2016 03:52 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Mon, May 23, 2016, 6:23 PM Andrew Purtell wrote: > Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like > to call a VOTE > on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator. > > Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PredictionIO

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:46 PM Henry Saputra wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Ted Dunning > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta)

Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

Since the Parquet is ASF project, referencing may make sense to me,Yes, I think Parquet project guys can comment on this point whether is it make sense for them. >With the usual precautions of a BD scan on the incoming IP and ongoing diligence by the PPMC we'll be fine. Thanks Julian for this

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > On 5/23/16, 3:22 PM, "Andrew Purtell" wrote: > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

+1 to that, Julian. You were absolutely right, I apologize I did not make it clear. Really appreciate another set of eyes reviewing it. - Henry On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > For the record, at the time that I reviewed the github repo, there was > code

Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

For the record, at the time that I reviewed the github repo, there was code that was not merely *inspired* by Mondrian code, but *derived* from Mondrian code. But that code has since been removed, so the issue is resolved. With the usual precautions of a BD scan on the incoming IP and ongoing

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote: > +1 > > > > > On 5/23/16, 3:22 PM, "Andrew Purtell" wrote: > > >Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like > >to call a VOTE > >on accepting

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 On 5/23/16, 3:22 PM, "Andrew Purtell" wrote: >Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like >to call a VOTE >on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator. > >Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PredictionIO > >​[ ] +1 Accept

Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

I thought the concern had been addressed? For Julian concern about Mondrian, the code was inspired by Mondrian but do not have direct derivatives of the code. According to Jacky, the old code is no longer used. As for Julien concern about Parquet, the design seemed to be inspired by Parquet and

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like > to call a VOTE > on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator. > > Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PredictionIO > > [ ] +1

Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: >> Hi Luke, >> >> I fully agree with you. The committers are already involved to clean-up the >> repo (PRs have been created). >>

Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Luke, > > I fully agree with you. The committers are already involved to clean-up the > repo (PRs have been created). > > IMHO, this step is decoupled from the proposal vote itself: the only > requirement is to

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) --Chris Nauroth On 5/23/16, 3:22 PM, "Andrew Purtell" wrote: >Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like >to call a VOTE >on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator. > >Proposal:

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like > to call a VOTE > on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator. > > Proposal:

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Andrew Purtell > wrote: > > > Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would > like > > to call a VOTE > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like > to call a VOTE > on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator. > > Proposal:

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Andrew Purtell > wrote: > > > Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would > like > > to call a VOTE > >

[VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator. Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PredictionIO ​[ ] +1 Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator [ ] +0 Abstain [ ] -1 Do not accept

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

Hey John, Thanks for the stack trace. The stack trace indicates that starting HBase minicluster on your laptop failed (as Andrew mentioned in an earlier email). To figure out why the minicluster startup is failing, it would be helpful if you attach the test output file. The test output file

[DISCUSS] Accept SensSoft into the Incubator

Hi general@, I would like to open a DISCUSS thread on the topic of accepting The Software as a Sensor™ (SensSoft ) Project into the Incubator. I am CC'ing Joshua Poore from the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. who we have been working with to build

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

Thanks James, I must have looked at the wrong branch/tag, now looked at the 0.8.0-incubating tag, and all looks clean there. Sorry for the noise. +1 (Binding) Thanks. -- Lars From: James Taylor To: "general@incubator.apache.org" ;

Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

Fully agree ! Regards JB On 05/23/2016 05:31 PM, Luke Han wrote: Hi Jean-Baptiste, My point is not saying such stuff have to be done before vote...it's my suggestion for your team to continue work on that. And I would like to say, for proposal to incubating, it's not only code

Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

Hi Jean-Baptiste, My point is not saying such stuff have to be done before vote...it's my suggestion for your team to continue work on that. And I would like to say, for proposal to incubating, it's not only code donation, it's better to have more discussion to bring a clear picture to

[PROPOSAL] to accept BRBAC into the Apache Incubator

[PROPOSAL] to accept BRBAC into the Apache Incubator = Abstract = Pluggable, Scalable and Fastest possible approach for Role Based Access Control (RBAC) based on binary arithmetic and basic Linux style permissions. = Proposal = BRBAC aims to become the default free, readymade and configurable