Re: [VOTE] Apache HAWQ (incubating) 2.0.0.0-incubating Release

Hi, > However, do you think that'd be a release blocker if we just have a link > not full content in the source tarsal? No it’s a very minor issue. I listed what I considered release blockers in my vote email next to the -1 vote. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache HAWQ (incubating) 2.0.0.0-incubating Release

the JIRA was drafted in such a way according to original feedback. I don't know what's the best way , will check with our project mentors for that. On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 3:25 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > @Justin - I've checked all [1]-[57] reference. [34]

Re: [VOTE] Apache HAWQ (incubating) 2.0.0.0-incubating Release

the JIRA was drafted in such a way according to original feedback. I don't know what's the best way , will check with our project mentors for that. On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 3:25 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > @Justin - I've checked all [1]-[57] reference. [34]

Re: [VOTE] Apache HAWQ (incubating) 2.0.0.0-incubating Release

Hi, > @Justin - I've checked all [1]-[57] reference. [34] ./src/port/glob.c > > >was not referred in your previous email anywhere. But given the > context, I think it fits in your comments about

Re: [VOTE] Apache HAWQ (incubating) 2.0.0.0-incubating Release

Thanks for the clarification. I've filed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-960 to track this. However, do you think that'd be a release blocker if we just have a link not full content in the source tarball? On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 3:19 PM Justin Mclean wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Apache HAWQ (incubating) 2.0.0.0-incubating Release

Hi, > Do you mean this should be put in VOTE email? I expected it in BUILD_INSTRUCTIONS.md but it just contains a link to the wiki page, but anywhere in the release is fine. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Apache HAWQ (incubating) 2.0.0.0-incubating Release

A quick update: I've filed - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-958 (for all license issues in Justin's email) @Justin - I've checked all [1]-[57] reference. [34] ./src/port/glob.c was not

Re: [VOTE] Apache HAWQ (incubating) 2.0.0.0-incubating Release

Hi Justin - for this comment: I’d suggest that build instructions are included in the release rather than a link to them. If the instructions at the URL change in the future how do I know how to build this release? We have a wikipage:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

Jersey is dual licensed CDDL and a transitive dependency from (at least) Hadoop and Spark. > On Jul 27, 2016, at 7:23 AM, Kam Kasravi wrote: > > Hi Justin > > These were tagged as GPL > > > I'll determine their dependencies linkage - we have no references to

Re: [VOTE] Apache HAWQ (incubating) 2.0.0.0-incubating Release

Thanks Justin for your detailed and thorough analysis - I'll bring this back to the community and address the items listed one by one. Meanwhile, please let us know if you see any other issues so we can solve them together in the next Release Candidate. Appreciate your effort. -Goden On Tue, Jul

RE: Code signing and WOT for releases

> -Original Message- > From: Martin Gainty [mailto:mgai...@hotmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 08:06 > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Code signing and WOT for releases > > > > > From: dennis.hamil...@acm.org > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Subject:

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3

+1 Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 27, 2016, at 9:32 AM, James Sirota wrote: > > This release is exactly the same as RC2, but the Mozilla licensed file was > removed so it doesn’t cause problems for us on the incubator general boards. > We no longer use it so we just

[VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3

This release is exactly the same as RC2, but the Mozilla licensed file was removed so it doesn’t cause problems for us on the incubator general boards. We no longer use it so we just removed it. This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3 incubating Full list of changes in

RE: Code signing and WOT for releases

> From: dennis.hamil...@acm.org > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Code signing and WOT for releases > Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 10:33:13 -0700 > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Nick Kew [mailto:n...@apache.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 02:25 > > To:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC4 as 0.8.1

Hi Justin These were tagged as GPL I'll determine their dependencies linkage - we have no references to com.sun.jersey within our codebase but it looks to be dual licensed? ThanksKam On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 6:28 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, > [Kam] This

Re: svn commit: r1753711 - in /incubator/public/trunk/content: podlings.xml projects/trafficcontrol.xml

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 7:39 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > TrafficControl is not yet a TLP, I am correcting their reporting group. > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:31 PM wrote: > >> Author: covener >> Date: Thu Jul 21 16:31:14 2016 >> New Revision: 1753711

Incubator PMC Report Timeline - August 2016

August 2016 Incubator report timeline: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2016 Wed August 03 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun August 07 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun August 07 -- Summary due by end of day Tue August 09 -- Mentor signoff due by end of

Re: svn commit: r1753711 - in /incubator/public/trunk/content: podlings.xml projects/trafficcontrol.xml

TrafficControl is not yet a TLP, I am correcting their reporting group. On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:31 PM wrote: > Author: covener > Date: Thu Jul 21 16:31:14 2016 > New Revision: 1753711 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1753711=rev > Log: > add basic Traffic Control