Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.2.0-incubating

Thanks for the review Justin and the website notes. Dan already created the corresponding Jira, we gonna fix that asap. Regards JB On 08/02/2016 02:17 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - file name contains incubating - signature and hash good - LICENSE and NOTICE good.

Re: On Fluo (was Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Fluo Parent POM 1-incubating (rc2))

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > - I think there is a very fair point brought up by Craig/Justin/John at > the gray line between "Apache Fluo" and "fluo.io". However, I will say > that I do *not* think this is remotely close to the level that we've > seen

Re: On Fluo (was Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Fluo Parent POM 1-incubating (rc2))

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:57 PM Josh Elser wrote: > Mentor here catching up on things here after being offline for a week... > > Wow. This rather blew up! A couple of things I wanted to say, in > addition to an ACK that this mentor is paying attention (as much as the > email

On Fluo (was Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Fluo Parent POM 1-incubating (rc2))

Mentor here catching up on things here after being offline for a week... Wow. This rather blew up! A couple of things I wanted to say, in addition to an ACK that this mentor is paying attention (as much as the email backlog is caught up, anyways). - I think there is a very fair point brought

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.2.0-incubating [rc3]

Hi all, After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing Apache Mnemonic 0.2.0-incubating passed with 5 binding +1s, 4 non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1. *Binding votes +1s:* Patrick Hunt (phunt) Henry Saputra (hsaputra) Gangumalla, Uma (umamahesh) Justin Mclean (justin) John

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.2.0-incubating

Hi Justin and Apache Beam team, I'm so Sorry, It is my bad, please ignore my previous mail, Thanks. Best Regards +Gary -Original Message- From: Wang, Gang1 [mailto:gang1.w...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 10:42 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE]

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.2.0-incubating

Hi Justin, Thank you for catching that, We would fix those issues you mentioned, Thanks. Best Regards +Gary -Original Message- From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] Sent: Monday, August 1, 2016 5:17 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.2.0-incubating

Hi general@incubator.apache.org, Apparently I thoroughly fat-fingered my initial mail and sent to APACHE.INCUBATOR.org instead of the correct domain. There are several IPMC members on the Beam-dev list (which was CC'ed) who thought I had correctly started the vote, but of course I had not. I

Re: [VOTE] Fluo Parent POM 1-incubating (rc2)

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Keith Turner wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 9:36 AM, John D. Ament wrote: >> I'm -1 until the website issues are resolved. >> >> - Make sure its clear that any existing releases are not apache endorsed. > > One

Re: [VOTE] Fluo Parent POM 1-incubating (rc2)

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 9:36 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > I'm -1 until the website issues are resolved. > > - Make sure its clear that any existing releases are not apache endorsed. One interesting thing this discussion has highlighted that we didn't realize was the following

Re: [VOTE] Fluo Parent POM 1-incubating (rc2)

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 8:08 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Ok, now I'm a bit confused. I'll try my best to state my points of > clarification in line. > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 7:37 PM Christopher wrote: > >> I also wish to point out that the

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.1-RC5 as 0.8.1 Release

IPMC Community We've been advised to cancel this vote since our PPMC vote was less than the minimum voting window of 72 hours. We will resubmit a VOTE to the IPMC community once the voting window of 72 hours has elapsed and we have a vote that passes. Thanks Kam