Re: [VOTE] Apache Fluo 1.0.0-incubating (rc2)

2016-10-03 Thread Drew Farris
+1 Binding I checked: - DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE all look good - no unexpected binaries in source - hashes good + signature verified - builds from source release + unit tests pass - Source files have ASF headers (except autogenerated files*) - convenience binary looks good. - incubating in n

Re: NetBeans next steps

2016-10-03 Thread Raphael Bircher
Hi at all I pinged Infra now. The lists should be online soon. Regards Raphael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fluo 1.0.0-incubating (rc2)

2016-10-03 Thread Christopher
Bump. Just want to remind IPMC this vote ends tonight at 11pm Eastern. On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:55 PM Christopher wrote: > Dear IPMC, > > Please vote for the following release candidate of Apache Fluo > 1.0.0-incubating. > > PPMC vote thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8b6ec5f17e

[VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.1BETA-RC2

2016-10-03 Thread James Sirota
This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron 0.2.1BETA-RC2 incubating Full list of changes in this release: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.2.1BETA-RC2-incubating/CHANGES The tag/commit to be voted upon is Metron_0.2.1BETA_rc2: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/

[RESULT] [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Storm JMS Integration

2016-10-03 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
With 72 hours having elapsed with no objections, this vote passes. -Taylor > On Sep 29, 2016, at 2:43 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > Apache Storm has received a code donation for Storm JMS Integration: > > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/storm-jms.html >

Re: NetBeans next steps

2016-10-03 Thread Ate Douma
On 2016-10-03 19:22, Raphael Bircher wrote: Hi all Heve sameone requested the ML at infra? I didn't find a issue for it. Bertrand already did, directly (see this thread first email from Bertrand). As I understand it, it doesn't require a JIRA issue. FYI: I'm busy otherwise until tomorrow. The

Re: NetBeans next steps

2016-10-03 Thread Raphael Bircher
Hi all Heve sameone requested the ML at infra? I didn't find a issue for it. Regards Raphael On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Michael Müller wrote: > I've sent it. ;-) > -- > Herzliche Grüße, Best regards > Michael Müller > > Twitter: @muellermi > Blog: blog.mueller-bruehl.de > Web Development w

[EXAMPLE] bootstrapping (was: Apache Example project?)

2016-10-03 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
On 3 October 2016 at 06:30, Luciano Resende wrote: > +1, > > I had started something similar, at least on the website side, with best > practices and required branding items. > > Please consider adding it to the "example" project : > > https://github.com/apache/apache-website-template Brilliant -

Re: NetBeans next steps

2016-10-03 Thread Michael Müller
I've sent it. ;-) -- Herzliche Grüße, Best regards Michael Müller Twitter: @muellermi Blog: blog.mueller-bruehl.de Web Development with Java and JSF: leanpub.com/jsf Java Lambdas and Parallel Streams: leanpub.com/lambdas Am 3. Oktober 2016 12:36:09 MESZ, schrieb Geertjan Wielenga : >Or maybe a

Re: NetBeans next steps

2016-10-03 Thread Niclas Hedhman
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEST-1 with a list of tasks that are needed as the initial steps of onboarding, and that is just to get going. I hope that provides a concrete view of what is needed from the Mentors in the first couple of weeks. Cheers Niclas On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 11:3

Re: NetBeans next steps

2016-10-03 Thread Wade Chandler
Thanks John and Gj! Wade === Wade Chandler e: cons...@wadechandler.com > On Oct 3, 2016, at 06:25, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > OK, thanks, will work with Wade and others who may be encountering this. > > Gj > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 12:20 PM, John D. Ament > wrote:

Re: NetBeans next steps

2016-10-03 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Or maybe a list of names could be provided of those who have already sent in there ICLAs for Apache NetBeans (incubating)? And those could then enter the process of having their accounts created manually. Gj On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wr

Re: NetBeans next steps

2016-10-03 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
OK, thanks, will work with Wade and others who may be encountering this. Gj On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 12:20 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Wade, > > ICLAs submitted before the vote don't get accounts created automatically. > Please reach out to your mentors to get your account created. > > John > > On

Re: NetBeans next steps

2016-10-03 Thread John D. Ament
Wade, ICLAs submitted before the vote don't get accounts created automatically. Please reach out to your mentors to get your account created. John On Oct 3, 2016 06:06, "Wade Chandler" wrote: > I have sent in my ICLA, and I received an acknowledgement it was received > and filed in the records

Re: NetBeans next steps

2016-10-03 Thread Wade Chandler
I have sent in my ICLA, and I received an acknowledgement it was received and filed in the records. I have not received any other to suggest an ID was created. When does that usually happen? Not a rush, but just so I know the protocol. Thanks Wade On Oct 1, 2016 11:35 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz"

Re: [VOTE] Apache Unomi 1.1.0-incubating release (take 2)

2016-10-03 Thread Thomas Draier
Hi all, The IPMC has voted for Unomi 1.1.0-incubating release. Here's the vote summary : 3 binding votes +1 : - Justin Mclean - John D. Ament - Jean-Baptiste Onofré No 0 or -1. Vote thread can be found here : http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201609.mbox/%3CCAKm8eOQ4tXk