Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.1.1-incubating release

Hi Julian Thanks for your kindly comments. sure, we will take care of it before next release. Regards Liang Julian Hyde-3 wrote > +1 (binding) > > Checked LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, checksums, ran rat, checked for > unexpected binaries. > > I was not able to build (not your fault - I did

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.1.1-incubating release

Good call on the "carbondata-parent" file name. It came from Maven artifact id =) - Henry On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, checksums, ran rat, checked for > unexpected binaries. > > I was not able to

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.1.1-incubating release

+1 (binding) Thanks for making the release. Build is fine DISCLAIMER exists. It has Œincubating¹ tag NOTICE & LICENCE files exists Regards, Uma On 10/5/16, 3:06 AM, "Liang Big data" wrote: >Hi all, > >PPMC vote for the release Apache CarbonData 0.1.1-incubating has

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.1.1-incubating release

+1 (binding) Checked LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, checksums, ran rat, checked for unexpected binaries. I was not able to build (not your fault - I did not have thrift installed and didn't have the time & patience to install it). Some notes: * It would be useful if source-release.zip contains a

[Result][Vote] Apache HAWQ 2.0.0.0-incubating RC4

Thanks all who helped to review the release candidate tarball. +1 (binding) - Justin Mclean (jus...@classsoftware.com) - Roman Shaposhnik(ro...@shaposhnik.org) - Alan Gates (alanfga...@gmail.com) File one JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-1087 based on feedback but it's not a

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.10.0 (incubating) RC5

The vote passes with: +1's (all binding) Andrew Purtell Justin Mclean Suneel Marthi No other votes. Thanks everyone! Regards, Donald

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.1.1-incubating release

DISCLAIMER file exits LICENSE file looks good NOTICE file look good Artifacts has incubating tag No executables binaries in source artifacts Can compile from source +1 (binding) - Henry On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Liang Big data wrote: > Hi all, > > PPMC vote for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.10.0 (incubating) RC5

+1 binding - Checked sums and signatures: ok - Spot checked LICENSE and NOTICE: present, properly formatted - No binaries in the source release (except source image files) - Compiled from source following the build instructions (8u102) - Manually invoked Apache RAT using

Re: [VOTE] Apache HAWQ 2.0.0.0-incubating RC4

+1. Checked the signatures, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE, and many LICENSE files (wow, 26, there must be an award for having that many). Ran rat, which seemed happy. Alan. > On Sep 30, 2016, at 12:23, Goden Yao wrote: > > Hi IPMC, > > HAWQ community has voted and passed RC4

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.10.0 (incubating) RC5

To clarify the only thing you will ever find in master is a set of commits tagged as an RC or release, never the intermediate changes as in typical master/snapshots. On Oct 7, 2016, at 8:59 AM, Pat Ferrel wrote: What Donald said but also we use a slightly different

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.10.0 (incubating) RC5

What Donald said but also we use a slightly different process than most Apache projects. Master is not a snapshot, we keep snapshots in the “develop” branch until RCs start and they are the only contents of master ever—that is RCs or releases. This process is not typical in Apache but I don’t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.2.0-incubating Release

Moving my vote from dev@ +1 binding On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I checked: > - name including incubating > - signature and hashed good > - DISCLAIMER exists > - LICENSE and NOTICE good > - Files have Apache header

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.2.0-incubating Release

On 07/10/16 13:14, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I checked: > - name including incubating > - signature and hashed good > - DISCLAIMER exists > - LICENSE and NOTICE good > - Files have Apache header except this file [1]. Please fix in the next > release. This file is generated

Re: Changed missing monthly attributes

Once I rebuild the site, you'll be monthly for Nov, Dec and Jan since we've missed Oct and it doesn't make sense to rush a report in. John On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:57 AM Makoto Yui wrote: > John, > > As you mentioned, we (hivemall) did not get "Reporting reminder

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.10.0 (incubating) RC5

Moving my vote from dev@ +1 binding On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I checked, > - incubating in name > - signatures and hashes correct > - LICENSE and NOTICE is fine > - No unexpected binaries > - All source files have

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.10.0 (incubating) RC5

Hi, +1 binding I checked, - incubating in name - signatures and hashes correct - LICENSE and NOTICE is fine - No unexpected binaries - All source files have ASF headers (although there are a large number of file that could possible have headers that don’t). - Can compile from source Very

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.1.1-incubating release

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - name includes incubating - DISCLAIMER exits - LICENSE and NOTICE good - No unexpected binaries in source - A source file is missing a header [1] please fix for next release. I assume this is Apache licensed? - Can compile from source Thanks, Justin 1.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.2.0-incubating Release

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - name including incubating - signature and hashed good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE good - Files have Apache header except this file [1]. Please fix in the next release. - No unexpected binary files in source release - Can compile from source Thanks,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.2.0-incubating Release

+1 (binding) Tim On 07/10/16 02:08, Ellison Anne Williams wrote: > Hi Guys, > > The PPMC vote for the Apache Pirk 0.2.0-incubating release has passed. We > kindly request that the IMPC now vote on the release.. > > The PPMC vote thread is located here: >