Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.0.0-incubating-RC3

2016-10-17 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 binding, but there's a few things that need fixing for the next release. Missing source release at [1] and this source release(?) at [2] contains jars not source. So assuming [3] is the source release - can you confirm this please. I checked: - name contains incubating - hashes good,

[VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.0.0-incubating-RC3

2016-10-17 Thread James Bognar
The Apache Juneau Incubator PPMC has voted +3 to release Apache Juneau 6.0.0-incubating RC3. This vote carries over +1 binding votes from IPMC mentors. Incubator PMC members please review and vote on this incubator release. Please note that this is our first attempt at a release, so please pay

Re: [discuss] Apache OpenWhisk Incubator Proposal

2016-10-17 Thread Sam Ruby
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I see that this is a proposal that originates, basically from IBM. IBM + Adobe > I have an issue, based on past history, related to IBM's continued > efforts and dedication on ASF projects. I will not mention specific >

Re: [discuss] Apache OpenWhisk Incubator Proposal

2016-10-17 Thread Jim Jagielski
I see that this is a proposal that originates, basically from IBM. I have an issue, based on past history, related to IBM's continued efforts and dedication on ASF projects. I will not mention specific projects, but the ASF has a number of projects which died (or almost died and only were revived

Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.1.0 release RC6

2016-10-17 Thread Sergio Fernández
Folks, more votes? The first release is very important for every podling, and we still need one additional binding vote. Thanks. On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 3:30 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I checked: > - name contains incubating > - signatures and