[VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)

Hello Incubator PMC, The Apache RocketMQ community has voted and approved the proposal to release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0 (incubating). We now kindly request the IPMC review and vote on this incubator release. [VOTE] Thread:

Re: Approving flawed release candidates

While I agree with what both John and Marvin are saying, the key word here is “discretion”. Obviously the IPMC shouldn’t give podlings too hard a time (we all know how difficult and time consuming it is to go through a cycle consisting of a release candidate and TWO votes, and the mechanics of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

Hi, > Or is your feeling that inclusion of the LICENSE is enough of a prominent > statement? In this case yes I can't see any reason to include it in NOTICE and LICENSE inclusion would be enough. But I'd be interested in what other IPMC people think. Either way it’s not a big issue, at worst

Re: Approving flawed release candidates

Hi Marvin, I don't think there's anything you're stating here that isn't in accordance to processes we have been following. If I look at the current Traffic Control vote, the problems I see are: - Assertion from the podling that they fixed the release, and votes from mentors indicating they

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:27 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > The reason is that the license is a Cat B. Otherwise, I would advise to > > include it in your notices file as well. NiFi does this well IMHO > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

Hi, > The reason is that the license is a Cat B. Otherwise, I would advise to > include it in your notices file as well. NiFi does this well IMHO >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

Perfect, thanks Dan. I'll point out that after looking at the PR I do see one more issue. For the font files, can you point to a public location for them? google tends to provide a free service hosting a number of fonts. The reason is that the license is a Cat B. Otherwise, I would advise to

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-b2-incubating-rc1

Hello All, Voting for Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-b2-incubating-rc1. The release has passed. The vote breakdown is as follows: +1 John D Ament (binding) +1 Jim Jagielski (binding) +1 Sterling Hughes (binding) Total: +3 binding. Thank you to all who voted. Thanks, Will

Approving flawed release candidates

Greets, We take pains to advise downstream consumers that podling releases are "incubating" because they may not live up to the standards expected of Apache TLPs -- whether that is because the community is not mature, because the release is not fully compliant with ASF policies, or what have you.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

On 2/15/17, 4:37 PM, "John D. Ament" wrote: >Dan, > >So here's my point of view. Justin's provided some more context on how to >shape licenses. If you feel very strongly that the release should go out >the door, the way it is, then I am OK with changing my vote to a

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron (incubating) 0.3.1-RC4

+1 release contents look good. Please don't forget as a part of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-589 I'll be expecting to see you remove 0.3.0 once 0.3.1 is published. John On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:21 AM Casey Stella wrote: > This is a call to vote on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-b2-incubating-rc1

+1 release contents look good. On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:25 PM will sanfilippo wrote: > Hello, > > The Apache Mynewt Incubator PPMC has approved a proposal to release > Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-b2-incubating-rc1. We now kindly request that the > Incubator PMC members review and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:10 PM Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:00 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:05 PM Marvin Humphrey > > wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Dan

Re: [discuss] Apache Gobblin Incubator Proposal

Hi Thanks for the proposal Jim! I will add you as a mentor then start the vote Cheers Olivier On 16 February 2017 at 02:35, Jim Jagielski wrote: > If you need/want another mentor, I volunteer > > > On Feb 14, 2017, at 3:53 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > > > > Hi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:00 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:05 PM Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote: > Personally, the reason why I'm asking about the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

Hi, > Thanks, John.. I'm confused on this. According to > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps : > > `In LICENSE, add a pointer to the dependency's license within the > distribution and a short note summarizing its licensing:` The pointer mentioned there is a file

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:05 PM Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote: > > You're right -- fixing the license file is not a huge effort (now that > > we understand what's expected..). The effort is in going

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote: > You're right -- fixing the license file is not a huge effort (now that > we understand what's expected..). The effort is in going thru the > voting process again.. > > I'll go with whatever you recommend.. Folks, we're

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

You're right -- fixing the license file is not a huge effort (now that we understand what's expected..). The effort is in going thru the voting process again.. I'll go with whatever you recommend.. thanks.. Dan On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:58 AM, John D. Ament wrote: >

Re: [discuss] Apache Gobblin Incubator Proposal

Thanks for the proposal Jim. Regards JB On Feb 15, 2017, 11:37, at 11:37, Jim Jagielski wrote: >If you need/want another mentor, I volunteer > >> On Feb 14, 2017, at 3:53 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: >> >> Hi >> Well I don't see issues as no one discuss the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

I'd like to know the effort required from your POV to fix the license file. Alex's description matches my expectations, thanks for clarifying it. I would rather not create a release that didn't match the licensing requirements, but will be OK if you come back saying its a huge effort (however, I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

Thanks, Alex.. John -- would it be reasonable to fix this in the next release barring any other major issues? thanks.. Dan On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 2/15/17, 7:40 AM, "Dan Kirkwood" wrote: > >>Thanks, John.. I'm

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

On 2/15/17, 7:40 AM, "Dan Kirkwood" wrote: >Thanks, John.. I'm confused on this. According to >http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps : > >`In LICENSE, add a pointer to the dependency's license within the >distribution and a short note

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

Thanks, John.. I'm confused on this. According to http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps : `In LICENSE, add a pointer to the dependency's license within the distribution and a short note summarizing its licensing:` Is MIT a special case in this regard? And in that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-b2-incubating-rc1

+1 (binding) > On Feb 9, 2017, at 10:24 PM, will sanfilippo wrote: > > Hello, > > The Apache Mynewt Incubator PPMC has approved a proposal to release > Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-b2-incubating-rc1. We now kindly request that the > Incubator PMC members review and vote on this

Re: [discuss] Apache Gobblin Incubator Proposal

If you need/want another mentor, I volunteer > On Feb 14, 2017, at 3:53 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > > Hi > Well I don't see issues as no one discuss the proposal. > So I will start the official vote tomorrow. > Cheers > Olivier > > On 6 February 2017 at 14:08, Olivier Lamy

[VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron (incubating) 0.3.1-RC4

This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron 0.3.1-RC4 incubating Full list of changes in this release: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.3. 1-RC4-incubating/CHANGES The tag/commit to be voted upon is apache-metron-0.3.1-rc4-incubating: