Re: Donating freemarker-online as part of the FreeMarker project, how?

Yesterday the ASF have received the CCLA. Does the IPMC accept it, can we go ahead with the pull request? Thursday, February 23, 2017, 7:15:29 AM, Craig Russell wrote: > Hi Daniel, > >> On Feb 22, 2017, at 9:24 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: >> >> Wednesday, February 22, 2017,

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Amaterasu Incubator Proposal

Hi Liang, Currently the deployment is really extracting the tar on a node that can be access by the Mesos cluster and running a job (once you do that the Mesos framework takes care of everything). Next versions (especially once adding YARN support) we will have more moving parts and we will make

Re: GitHub workflows?

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:34 PM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: >> For what it's worth, on one dev list I'm on, pull requests make it to the >> dev list, but commenting on a commit via the Github interface

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Amaterasu Incubator Proposal

Hi Yaniv Thanks, i would find some time to try it. Is there any deployment UI from Amaterasu for easier using? Regards Liang Yaniv Rodenski wrote > Hi Liang, > > We are currently working on YARN support, but it's not quite there yet. > > What you can do at this point (as a workaround) is

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc6 as 0.1.0

ping, any other volunteers to review the release candidate ? On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Verified licenses, signatures, overall layout for the three distros > packages, no binary jars on source distro, > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Amaterasu Incubator Proposal

Hi Liang, We are currently working on YARN support, but it's not quite there yet. What you can do at this point (as a workaround) is setup a single node Mesos cluster and configure it to use your YARN cluster. If you would like to try that LMK, and I'll help you set it up (it's not that

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Amaterasu Incubator Proposal

Hi Good luck! one question:If my system using YARN cluster, can i use Amaterasu for development? -- We have also created a Mesos cluster you can use to test Amaterasu or use for development purposes Regards Liang

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0 (incubating)

The Apache Traffic Control team would like to announce the release of Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0 (incubating). More details regarding Apache Traffic Control can be found at: http://trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org/ The release artifacts can be downloaded here:

[DISCUSS] Apache Amaterasu Incubator Proposal

Hi all, I would like to submit a new proposal to bring Amaterasu to the Apache Software Foundation incubator. The proposal is included below and available on the wiki: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AmaterasuProposal We are eager to get your comments and questions. Thanks ! JB (on

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron (incubating) 0.3.1-RC5

+1 binding - signature and checksums are good - artifact name contains incubating - tarball matches tag - builds from source - license and notice seem appropriate On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 13:53:28 -0500, Casey Stella wrote: > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron

[VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.5.0-incubating [rc1]

Hello incubator PMCs, The Apache Mnemonic community PPMCs and developers have voted and approved the proposal to release Apache Mnemonic 0.5.0 (incubating). Apache Mnemonic is an advanced hybrid memory storage oriented library, it's proposed a non-volatile/durable Java object model and durable

[VOTE] MADlib v1.10-rc2

Hello Incubator PMC, The Apache MADlib (incubating) community has voted on and approved the proposal to release MADlib v1.10-rc2. The voting result is available at:

New opportunity at ApacheCon: Community Sponsorship

Hello Apache Community --it's my pleasure to announce that we have a new opportunity for Apache projects, communities, and their supporters to bolster their commitment and visibility at ApacheCon. For the first time, community members of a single Apache Project (e.g., Flex) or category (e.g.,

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache CarbonData podling graduation

I think the wording needs tuning, and my own interpretation of the intent has been, Project claims itself to comply, and list any exceptions and why that is the case. I think that can deal with the invariance that exists. Cheers Niclas On Mar 7, 2017 14:48, "Jim Apple"

Re: GitHub workflows?

Thanks Marvin for the pointers. But my question is not so much whether we can accept pull requests or handle GH issues. It is whether it is ok to be the *primary* workflow and dev@ is an archive. The podling is coming from a GitHub-only culture, and the core team in the same company. S... 1.