Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.1.5-incubating [rc2]

hi Justin, Henry: Yes, we run Rat and it didn't complain much. Anyway, thanks for pointing out, we will replace it with the right ASF license header. Thanks, William From: Justin Mclean Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 9:11:15 AM To:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.2 (incubating)

Hi, > The patch that contains “bullet.js” was committed on Wed May 25 > (https://github.com/novus/nvd3/commit/b7670eeaffe45a23bae1797306750c2b6ae8bcce > > ), > thus after the removal of the GPL-license file, and

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.1.5-incubating [rc2]

Hi, > Just confirm , you mean ASF license header as below is wrong , after double > check, I do see this ASF license header in griffin. I don't remember where > this license comes from. It’s likely that the files were either original from a 3rd party or someone copied the license header out

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.1.5-incubating [rc2]

just create a jira bug for this, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRIFFIN-32 Thanks, William From: William Guo Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 6:35:40 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.1.5-incubating [rc2]

hi Henry, Just confirm , you mean ASF license header as below is wrong , after double check, I do see this ASF license header in griffin. I don't remember where this license comes from. Some files do have different ASF license header, as /*- * Licensed under the Apache License,

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

Isn't the release binaries going to contain bits from zeromq because of #include though? That header file is still going to be LGPL 3.0 licensed right? On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:45 PM John D. Ament wrote: > Mu, > > So what happens when ZeroMQ is not available, do you

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

Mu, So what happens when ZeroMQ is not available, do you fall back to something else? I'm inclined to say that this is allowable, knowing that its an optional dynamically linked dependency that has an alternative. Assuming it has an alternative. I would strongly encourage podlings to try to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.2 (incubating)

And to answer the question why this only came up now. I'm mentoring the Aria Tosca project, and looking at their release pointed out some of these issues, so only then I came to find out the differences about this. Thanks to Ran, I understand better now. John On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:38 PM

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

MXNet's backend is written in C++, which is not able to use the java interface. On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Are you guys able to use this (which is what we use in Apache Toree)? > > https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq > > Which has been

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

Are you guys able to use this (which is what we use in Apache Toree)? https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq Which has been successfully relicensed? https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq/blob/master/LICENSE On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > One of the items that

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

It's optional for MXNet to use ZeroMQ. Even if it is enabled, the source codes of MXNet will not contain any codes from ZeroMQ except for "include" and calling zeromq's APIs. But if we want to ship the binary, it will link against libzeromq.a On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 9:21 AM, John D. Ament

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.1.5-incubating [rc2]

-1 (binding) The source code has wrong ASF license header, it should use this one for code developed under ASF: https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html - Henry On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:09 PM, William Guo wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on releasing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.2 (incubating)

Thanks alot. That does indeed help, and might be a structure we will start using ourselves. Cheers Bolke Sent from my iPhone > On 6 Jul 2017, at 17:34, Ran Ziv wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm not 100% sure this is relevant, but regarding sdist vs source tarball, > we just had a

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

Hen, Can you give some more info about how MXnet uses ZeroMQ? Is it an optional dependency or required? Are you actually bundling ZeroMQ in your release (source or binary)? John On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:23 AM Henri Yandell wrote: > One of the items that is on the list to

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

I think that the goals are really quite different. But I don't know about Artemis very much. On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > Hi Hen, > > Why not explore the use of Apache Artemis as an alternative? > > Cheers, > Chris > > > > > On 7/5/17, 11:23 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.2 (incubating)

Hi, I'm not 100% sure this is relevant, but regarding sdist vs source tarball, we just had a similar issue in the apache-ariatosca project when the release candidate package I had brought up to a vote contained a Pythonic sdist rather than a source code tarball. We ended up creating three

Re:[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 2.0.0 incubating (RC6)

Dear IPMC Community, I am pleased to announce that the Incubator PMC has approved 2.0.0-RC6 of Apache Traffic Control (Incubating) for release as “Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.0.0" The vote has passed with: - three binding "+1" votes - no "0" votes - no "-1" votes The votes were

Re: [DISCUSS] Fluo graduation as TLP

Thanks, John. Consider this mentor +1 then. On 7/5/17 7:03 PM, John D. Ament wrote: For what it's worth, I have no concerns with Fluo's graduation based on the conversation here. John On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:02 PM Josh Elser wrote: On 7/5/17 1:51 PM, Dave Fisher

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

Hi Hen, Why not explore the use of Apache Artemis as an alternative? Cheers, Chris On 7/5/17, 11:23 PM, "Henri Yandell" wrote: One of the items that is on the list to do before releasing Apache MXNet is removing ZeroMQ from the codebase/dependencies.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.2 (incubating)

Protovis became d3, which is BSD licensed. D3’s examples contain the same code. The author (Mike Bostock) is the same in both cases. I have just send him an email, I hope he responds. Cheers Bolke > On 6 Jul 2017, at 15:08, Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI, > >> [20]

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

Greg Stein wrote on 7/6/17 4:01 AM: > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:23 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> ... > >> I'd like to ask on legal-discuss@ for an exception (one year?) to continue >> using ZeroMQ, with prominent documentation, in MXNet given the trend >> towards MPL 2.0. >> > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.2 (incubating)

Hi Justin, That’s for the whole project nvd3, which was then also dual licensed APL2. Next to that this file has existed only for two months in this repository: Bolkes-MacBook-Pro:nvd3 bolke$ git log --all --full-history -- GPL-LICENSE.v3.txt commit 8e52a5743e843015495da495f83153ac5552edf3

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.2 (incubating)

Hi, > I have looked at the history of nvd3 “bullet” implementation and its history > says it is copied from d3-examples > (https://github.com/novus/nvd3/commit/b7670eeaffe45a23bae1797306750c2b6ae8bcce > > ) >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.2 (incubating)

HI, > [20] “nv.d3.js” originates from http://nvd3.org and its > license states it is Apache License 2, > https://github.com/novus/nvd3/blob/master/LICENSE.md > . And as far as I > understand it it should not need to be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.2 (incubating)

I have looked at the history of nvd3 “bullet” implementation and its history says it is copied from d3-examples (https://github.com/novus/nvd3/commit/b7670eeaffe45a23bae1797306750c2b6ae8bcce ) which is located at:

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.4-RC1

Dear IPMC Community, I am pleased to announce that the Incubator PMC has approved 0.8.4-RC1 of Apache Gearpump (Incubating) for release as version 0.8.4 (Incubating). The vote has passed with: - three binding "+1" votes - no "0" votes - no "-1" votes The votes were

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.2 (incubating)

Hi Justin, [20] “nv.d3.js” originates from http://nvd3.org and its license states it is Apache License 2, https://github.com/novus/nvd3/blob/master/LICENSE.md . And as far as I understand it it should not need to be

Re: [VOTE] publish ariatosca 0.1.0

Thanks everyone. Regarding MacOS installation, it's indeed a "TODO" at the moment. We only have instructions and test installation on Linux and Windows at this time. Regarding licenses in YAML files, we've had a discussion on the ariatosca dev mailing list a while back about whether these are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.2 (incubating)

Hi, > The situation isn't that bad. It is due to the fact this is a "sdist" (not a > bdist). A single -1 vote isn’t bad and other IPMC member may vote +1 - but probably unlikely in this case I think. Whatever the artefact is called the LICENSE and NOTICE needs to reflect what is contained

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:23 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: >... > I'd like to ask on legal-discuss@ for an exception (one year?) to continue > using ZeroMQ, with prominent documentation, in MXNet given the trend > towards MPL 2.0. > I'm not super cozy with the idea of explicit

ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

One of the items that is on the list to do before releasing Apache MXNet is removing ZeroMQ from the codebase/dependencies. ZeroMQ is licensed under the LGPL 3.0 with an exception for static compiling. They have long been interested in relicensing to MPL 2.0, but haven't made much progress,