[RESULT][VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.2.0 release RC3

Hi All, The vote for releasing Apache S2Graph 0.2.0-incubating passed with 5 binding +1s, 3 non-binding +1s, and no 0 or -1. Binding +1s: Sergio Fernández Justin Mclean Josh Elser John D. Ament Seetharam Venkatesh The votes were (

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache RocketMQ from podling to TLP

Hi John, Thanks for your suggestion, we have looked through the graduation process carefully and made a discussion in PPMC email list sufficiently. From our guide picture[1] depict, I haven't seen the IPMC discuss process. But in the next paragraph, I noticed the description : The resolution

Re: Proper way to retire podlings/madlib.yml

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 8:35 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:13 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> first of all, I wanted to let y'all know that the MADlib trademark >> transferred has finally happened and thus

Re: Proper way to retire podlings/madlib.yml

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:13 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > first of all, I wanted to let y'all know that the MADlib trademark > transferred has finally happened and thus PODLINGNAMESEARCH-125 > is now successfully resolved. Thanks to all who helped in the process! > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache RocketMQ from podling to TLP

Hi Von Gosling, A few concerns pop up on my side when looking at this. - You're mixing public and private mailing lists in this email. - You may want to review [1] - we do call out the need to forward to the incubator that the vote. This is usually to start discussions. Specifically we do ask

[VOTE] Graduate Apache RocketMQ from podling to TLP

Hello IPMC, The recent DISCUSS thread in PPMC and VOTE thread in Community on the topic of Apache RocketMQ graduation have been opened for at least 72 hours, and I believe all questions have been answered and issues addressed at this point. With the discussion having settled down, I would now

Re: Proper way to retire podlings/madlib.yml

Roman thank you and congrats for fulfilling your commitment. Sincerely appreciate it, and a model for all to follow. Cheers, Chris Mattmann On 8/22/17, 1:13 PM, "shaposh...@gmail.com on behalf of Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: Hi!

Proper way to retire podlings/madlib.yml

Hi! first of all, I wanted to let y'all know that the MADlib trademark transferred has finally happened and thus PODLINGNAMESEARCH-125 is now successfully resolved. Thanks to all who helped in the process! This, in turn, made me go back to Incubator website to clean up a few things for MADlib. I

Re: [VOTE] Release Livy 0.4.0-incubating based on Livy 0.4.0 RC2

OK, sure, I will remove RC1 from the directory. Thanks Jerry On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 7:24 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Hi, > > Looking at your release, it's confusing what we are voting on. If RC2 is > under vote, please remove RC1 from this directory. > > John > > On

Re: [VOTE] Release Livy 0.4.0-incubating based on Livy 0.4.0 RC2

Hi, Looking at your release, it's confusing what we are voting on. If RC2 is under vote, please remove RC1 from this directory. John On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 3:33 AM Jerry Shao wrote: > Hello Incubator PMC’ers, > > The Apache Livy community has decided to release Apache Livy

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 1.8.2 based on Airflow 1.8.2 RC4

Hi, +1 to release...however, please make sure you are cleaning up your old releases. Do not keep old releases on dist.a.o. John On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:18 PM Maxime Beauchemin < maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Incubator PMC’ers, > > The Apache Airflow community has voted and

[VOTE] Release Livy 0.4.0-incubating based on Livy 0.4.0 RC2

Hello Incubator PMC’ers, The Apache Livy community has decided to release Apache Livy 0.4.0-incubating based on 0.4.0-incubating Release Candidate 2. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members to review and vote on this incubator release. Livy is web service that exposes a REST interface