Re: [VOTE] Accept PLC4X into the Apache Incubator

+1 Best regards Pierre On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 at 08:13 Luciano Resende wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 3:19 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I would like to start a VOTE to propose the PLC4X project as a podling > > into the

Re: [VOTE] Accept PLC4X into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 3:19 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to start a VOTE to propose the PLC4X project as a podling > into the Apache incubator. > > The ASF voting rules are described: > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html < >

Re: [VOTE] Accept PLC4X into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Greg Trasuk > On Dec 14, 2017, at 10:55 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On Dec 14, 2017 15:19, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I would like to start a VOTE to propose the PLC4X project as a podling >> into

Re: [VOTE] Accept PLC4X into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Dec 14, 2017 15:19, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to start a VOTE to propose the PLC4X project as a podling > into the Apache incubator. > > The ASF voting rules are described: > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - December 2017

Can you fix it? It's posted the same way as in the wiki. Probably just best to leave it single line. On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:05 PM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi John, > > Looks like my comment for Trafodion got badly formatted > > Thanks > > Jacques > > > Le

Re: [VOTE] Accept PLC4X into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding -- I just saw this project: very cool! I'm going to check it out. On Dec 14, 2017 3:19 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to start a VOTE to propose the PLC4X project as a podling > into the Apache incubator. > > The ASF voting rules are

[VOTE] Accept PLC4X into the Apache Incubator

Hi All, I would like to start a VOTE to propose the PLC4X project as a podling into the Apache incubator. The ASF voting rules are described: https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podling is a

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - December 2017

Hi John, Looks like my comment for Trafodion got badly formatted Thanks Jacques Le 14/12/2017 à 02:05, John D. Ament a écrit : All, Below is the current draft. Not much has changed since I sent last draft. We're still missing sign off on 3 podling reports. Mentors for OpenWhisk, Myriad

Re: Giving karma

New accounts on podlings are automatically added to the group. You can see the roster at https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/committee/incubator John On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 1:53 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > The incubator group doesn’t seem to be surfaced in whimsy. I presume I >

Re: Giving karma

The incubator group doesn’t seem to be surfaced in whimsy. I presume I need to add to this: https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/crail > On Dec 14, 2017, at 10:45 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Anyone in the 'incubator'

Re: Giving karma

Anyone in the 'incubator' group can edit the SVN files. On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 1:43 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > As a mentor of the Crail podling (and an ASF member) I want to give one of > the PPMC permission to edit their status file, >

Giving karma

As a mentor of the Crail podling (and an ASF member) I want to give one of the PPMC permission to edit their status file, http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/crail.xml . How

Re: [PROPOSAL] PLC4X - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi All, I just changed the git-wip address with a gitbox version, as I was told that new incubator projects will require to use gitbox. Chris Am 13.12.17, 01:41 schrieb "Mike Drob" : > Can’t enter incubation without having code. I think this has been done

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Eggend 1.2.0-incubating

Hi all, so as far as I can see and count, the vote passes with: +1 = 3 (Justin, John, Luciano) 0 = 0 -1 = 0 Thanks for your support :-) Chris Am 11.12.17, 13:30 schrieb "Luciano Resende" : +1 (binding) On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 1:39 AM, Christofer Dutz

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Felix Bundle Archive File Installer Extension

John, yeah, I see that the schedule B is somewhat lacking. Oh well, ok, so basically we are fine with a CCLA but in this case we don't think the provided one is explicit enough (plus we want an ICLA for Jessica Marz). I'll let them know and get back to this thread when there is either an SGA or

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Felix Bundle Archive File Installer Extension

Karl, I just read the CCLA that was filed. I do not believe it is clear enough in the schedule B that it contains to conclude what is meant to be included. Since you're a chair, you should have access to it at https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/documents/cclas/intel-corporation-felix.pdf

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Felix Bundle Archive File Installer Extension

John, it might typically be an SGA but it does say: "This grant can either be done by the ASF Corporate CLA (via Schedule B) or the Software Grant Agreement". Should we change that wording then? Anyways, I will follow-up with Intel via Jessica and let them know that the provided Corporate CLA

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Felix Bundle Archive File Installer Extension

Karl, If the code is already Apache licensed, then I would check w/ secretary@ or legal-discuss@ to confirm what documents need to be in place to remove the Intel copyright claim (typically those would go in to the NOTICE file for Apache Felix going forward). This is typically done as an SGA

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Felix Bundle Archive File Installer Extension

Hi John, the code has been available as AL with the Intel copyright already (the license headers in the files are unchanged). It is mainly an attempt to get it contributed to Apache Felix. I told them we need the following (from the incubator ip-clearance form): "A software grant must be

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Felix Bundle Archive File Installer Extension

Karl, CCLA [1] is just a document indicating that the corporate entity has given approval for individuals associated to it to contribute to Apache under ICLAs. It really doesn't provide any legal bearing to relicense code outside of an ICLA/SGA. Usually when projects come to us with an IP

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Felix Bundle Archive File Installer Extension

Hi John, as far as I understand the situation, the contribution has been submitted by Jessica Marz on behalf of Intel. The copyright is entirely Intel and the CCLA received is _from_ Intel, covering Jessica Marz and the contribution. Does that help? regards, Karl On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 1:54

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

Closing the VOTE with the following binding IPMC votes: [+1]: Romain Manni-Bucau, Mark Struberg, Justin Mclean, Jean-Louis Monteiro txs to all who reviewed and voted! LieGrue, strub > Am 12.12.2017 um 07:28 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > Hi > > Long and interesting