Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

The exclusions are in the build.xml in github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans. I am quite sure that the rat exclusions are set too wide, at this point, the idea being to resolve those over the coming releases bit by bit. Gj On Sunday, January 21, 2018, Justin Mclean

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

Hi, > In many/most cases, the issues picked up by Justin are issues that are not > visible if our rat exclusions are taken into account. Now, of course, what > we can do is discuss those rat exclusions. However, a starting point would > be for Justin or anyone else here to use those rat

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

In many/most cases, the issues picked up by Justin are issues that are not visible if our rat exclusions are taken into account. Now, of course, what we can do is discuss those rat exclusions. However, a starting point would be for Justin or anyone else here to use those rat exclusions when

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

Yes, we excluded test/*/data directories via rat exclusions on the basis that files within them are test data and hence can be excluded. There is no test code here. At worst, as pointed out below, there’s pseudo code. Gj On Saturday, January 20, 2018, Jan Lahoda wrote: > On

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

Hi, > the XSDs for JPA 2.0 and up are EPL/EDL, however the XSDs for 1.0 are > GPL/CDDL. If you want to review [1]. AIUI the XSDs are part of the > "accompanying materials" portion of the license. Either way, this only > explains a small part of the licensing issues in the release. Interesting

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 5:05 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > I see there's multiple issues in here, but do you agree that files like > [1] > > are dual licensed EPLv1 and EDLv1 (BSD-3-Clause) so can be included? > > Normally when something is dual licensed you

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

Hi, > I see there's multiple issues in here, but do you agree that files like [1] > are dual licensed EPLv1 and EDLv1 (BSD-3-Clause) so can be included? Normally when something is dual licensed you include which license you select in the LICENSE file. [1] EDL is Category A so if something was

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.1.0-RC3

AFAIK the normal way to announce this is to send a message with the subject starting: [RESULT][VOTE] ... Also the votes should be tallied. See for example: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/95689e3c01a601a6c5ff8873785d8728c2eb2f95b040a9fbcb159d7f@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E On 19

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 2:14 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Could please the FAQ be updated with exact requirements (or the point > > removed), to avoid further confusion? > > It [1] seems clear to me i.e. there’s an exception for test data but not > test code. > Yes.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

Justin, I haven't gone through the full release yet, but wanted to run this by you. On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 7:54 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Since two of our mentors gave a +1 in the PPMC vote, I’m interested in > > their take on your review too. Just curious,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

Hi, > Could please the FAQ be updated with exact requirements (or the point > removed), to avoid further confusion? It [1] seems clear to me i.e. there’s an exception for test data but not test code. Thanks, Justin 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

Hi, > Since two of our mentors gave a +1 in the PPMC vote, I’m interested in > their take on your review too. Just curious, that’s all, how they evaluate > your points. Sure I would also be interested in what they have to say and I would be wiling to change my vote if they can convince me to do

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Hi Justing, > > It’s Justin actually. > Opops, sorry. > > > Regarding the Java files and .pass files: as NetBeans is (among other > > things) a Java IDE, it has tests that take a Java file (often very

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

Hi Justin, Many thanks for your thorough review, by the end of this we’re really going to have a release that is excellently IP-cleared. Since two of our mentors gave a +1 in the PPMC vote, I’m interested in their take on your review too. Just curious, that’s all, how they evaluate your points.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

Hi, > Hi Justing, It’s Justin actually. > Regarding the Java files and .pass files: as NetBeans is (among other > things) a Java IDE, it has tests that take a Java file (often very simple > or peculiar). The expected output may be in a .pass file - in which case > the .pass file may contain

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

Hi Justing, Thanks for the comments. I guess it will take some time for us to fully go through the list and resolve it. I have a few comments/questions inline if I may. On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > It -1 (binding) as there may be GPL