[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache DataFu 1.3.3 release RC1

The vote has passed with three +1 binding votes, and no -1s or 0s. Binding +1s: Justin Mclean (binding), Jakob Homan (binding), Roman Shaposhnik (binding) Thanks for taking the time to look at the release! -Matt On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Hayes < matthew.terence.ha...@gmail.com>

Re: [VOTE] Apache DataFu 1.3.3 release RC1

Thanks for taking a look Roman. I have filed the following JIRA about the gradle.properties issue you raised: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DATAFU-136 On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - checked sigs > -

Re: [VOTE] Apache DataFu 1.3.3 release RC1

+1 (binding) - checked sigs - LICENSES/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER look good - Headers look good - checked for the release tag in Git - offending (cat X) material got removed, but otherwise git tag matches release tarball Thanks, Roman. P.S. Weirdly gradle.properties is set to non-release on tag -- you

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Le 26 janv. 2018 21:53, "Byung-Gon Chun" a écrit : On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 5:41 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Why not doing a beam subproject? Any blocker? > > Thanks for the question, Romain. We have a flexible, efficient runtime that supports

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 5:41 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Why not doing a beam subproject? Any blocker? > > Thanks for the question, Romain. We have a flexible, efficient runtime that supports various user programs (e.g., Beam and Spark programs). We are taking

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Why not doing a beam subproject? Any blocker? Otherwise +1 to have it @asf, makes a lot of sense. Le 26 janv. 2018 20:58, "Byung-Gon Chun" a écrit : > On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote: > > > Great work -- I think this technology has a lot

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote: > Great work -- I think this technology has a lot of promise, and I'd love to > see its evolution inside the Foundation. > > Thanks, Davor! > Parts of it, like the Onyx Intermediate Representation [1], overlap with > the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Great work -- I think this technology has a lot of promise, and I'd love to see its evolution inside the Foundation. Parts of it, like the Onyx Intermediate Representation [1], overlap with the work-in-progress inside the Apache Beam project ("portability"). We'd love to work together on this --

Re: License headers on test data (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2)

2018-01-23 17:36 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > FWIW, some build and test processes have a "generate-sources" and/or > "generate-test-sources" step. Have you considered having a step in your > test processes copy the source test files into a temporary folder and > remove the

Re: [Request] Write access to the incubator wiki

Added, happy editing! On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 9:37 PM Joo Yeon Kim wrote: > Hi, > > Please grant me write access to the incubator wiki: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator. > > My user name is JooYeonKim. > > Thank you :) > > - Joo Yeon Kim >