Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.12.0 release RC2

2018-03-30 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, I wonder if we could get some review/votes from other IPMCs? We still need 2 more votes. Thanks Olivier On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 at 09:10, Matt Sicker wrote: > It's not a deal breaker IMO, just a difficulty in getting set up. > > On 27 March 2018 at 16:32, Abhishek Tiwari wrote: > > > Thanks Ma

Who has the experiences to assemble NOTICE file?

2018-03-30 Thread Ying Chun Guo
Hi, friends I'd like to learn from people who has the experience to assemble the legal NOTICE file before. I need to do this for Apache OpenWhisk repos. I find manually assembling NOTICE is a complex and error-prone task especially for a non-legal person like me. Is there a tool to help on that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1 - Second Attempt

2018-03-30 Thread Matt Sicker
* Rat check ok (checked exceptions as well) * Build and tests ok * Signatures ok Question regarding the NOTICE file: shouldn't the vertx classes that are bundled be noted here? On 29 March 2018 at 22:59, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked: > - build > - signatures and header

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.12.0 release RC2

2018-03-30 Thread Matt Sicker
+1 (binding) * Signatures ok * Rat check ok * Build and tests ok * Disclaimer, License, and Notice ok On 30 March 2018 at 05:57, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > I wonder if we could get some review/votes from other IPMCs? > We still need 2 more votes. > Thanks > Olivier > > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 at

Re: Who has the experiences to assemble NOTICE file?

2018-03-30 Thread Alex Harui
Writing code is error prone too. Just like code, make a good effort, let the code reviewers catch things, make more changes, review it again. The key thing is to do the work and get the reviews in a timely fashion instead of at release vote time. No big deal if you miss something. That's why the

Re: Who has the experiences to assemble NOTICE file?

2018-03-30 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I guess you have read [1]? But basically you should do this: - Take the boilerplate NOTICE [2] - Update the year to the current year - Did your code come in via a software grant, then add that (relocated copyrights).[3] - Is there any 3rd party code contained / bundleded inside the release?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1 - Second Attempt

2018-03-30 Thread Willem Jiang
Hi Matt, I checked the vertx NOTICE.md[1] was added since 3.5.1[2], but we are using vertx 3.5.0[3]. BTW For the bundled Apache Licensed dependency, I checked the instruction[4], but it doesn't mention what should be put into the top-level NOTICE file. we will add a reference of it vertx NOTICE.

[VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version 5.0.0-alpha (3rd round)

2018-03-30 Thread ???? Sheng Wu
Hi All, This is a call for vote to release Apache SkyWalking (Incubating) version 5.0.0-alpha. The Apache SkyWalking community has tested, voted and approved the proposed release of Apache SkyWalking (Incubating) 5.0.0-alpha From last vote: 1. Separated the NOTICE and LICENSE in source package