I know, it's summer. But kindly ask to review and vote if you have time.
Thanks a lot,
Marton
On 07/06/2018 05:59 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
Hi All,
The Apache Ratis community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache Ratis 0.2.0-rc2.
We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC
Hi,
> I know, it's summer. But kindly ask to review and vote if you have time.
It’s only summer in 1/2 the earth I’ve got the heater on here :-)
I suggest you ask your mentors to vote on the release as they are IPMC members.
Thanks,
Justin
--
Thanks to all who voted!
The release has passed with the following IPMC votes:
+1 Jean-Baptiste Onofré (binding)
+1 Justin Mclean (binding)
+1 Davor Bonaci (binding)
The Vote Thread:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201807.mbox/%3CCAKm_3C3-C6Fs2Qa7tZ5VGs3EoCEd_8gmi5QyD
+1 binding
吴晟 Sheng Wu 于2018年7月8日周日 下午10:50写道:
> Hi All,
> This is a call for vote to release Apache SkyWalking (Incubating) version
> 5.0.0-beta2.
>
>
> The Apache SkyWalking community has tested, voted and approved the proposed
> release of Apache SkyWalking (Incubating) 5.0.0-beta2
>
>
> We no
+1 (binding)
* Source release contains only source files
* Can build from source
* Couldn't get tests to pass (oh well)
* Nice work on the bin release's L&N files
* Glanced at website, too; looks like you have necessary info
* Smoketest on the bin release worked
* Tag and commit exist in SCM
Wou
Dear IPMC members,
This vote has passed with 6 +1 votes (bindings), 2 +1 votes (non-binding) and
no 0 or -1 votes.
+1 (binding), David Grove
+1 (binding), James Dubee
+1 (binding), James Thomas
+1 (binding), Rodric Rabbah
+1 (binding), Vincent Hou
+1 (binding), Ying Chun Guo
+1 (non-binding),
Hi,
+1 (binding)
For the source release I checked:
- incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- All source files have headers, this file [1] has an incorrect header
- no binary files in release
- can compile from source
For the binary release the NOTICE file contains
Hi,
Sorry but it’s -1 (binding) as it's unclear how the fonts [1] are licensed and
they may be category X.
The svg version of the fonts looks like it may of had an ASF apache header
incorrectly added.
For the source release I checked:
- incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is missi
Hi,
I'd like to join the IPMC to help mentor the SkyWalking project. I am
already a member of the ComDev PMC and would like to get involved in the
Incubator to get a deeper insight into its duties and how we can help
communities there. I'd like to initially help mentor the SkyWalking project
but l
Hi Justin,
Thanks for you review.
These fonts[1] are from "ant-design" project, which is already list in our
License file. I think the mistake is, we shouldn't add Apache head to that
file, instead, we should add exclusion in rat and put some comments there too.
Thanks for pointing this out
Hi Justin,
Thanks for you review.
These fonts[1] are from "ant-design" project, which is already list in our
License file. I think the mistake is, we shouldn't add Apache head to that
file, instead, we should add exclusion in rat and put some comments there too.
Thanks for pointing this out.
Hi,
The license in the source release is boilerplate and contains no 3rd party
licenses.
How are those fonts licensed? It's not clear looking at the ant design
project that the fonts are under the same license as the ant design code.
In fact AFAICS the fonts are not included in that project. If t
Hi Justin.
We used to have the same question, too. We discussed with ant-design community,
here are their feedbacks could be found in GitHub.
1. The codebase of those fonts are here: ant-design/antd-init . They declared
that free to use from their README[1].
2. For 100% confirm, our PMC submi
Hi, dave,
Could this vote be closed ?
It seems that it has passed half a week since July 6th,
Thanks.
发件人: Dave Fisher mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>>
答复: mailto:general@incubator.apache.org>>
日期: 2018年7月6日 星期五 上午3:22
至: mailto:general@incubator.apache.org>>
主题: [VOTE] Accept Doris into the Apache
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 9:35 PM Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 1:10 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> >...
>
>> For podlings that have an active GitHub through GitBox the implication of
>> this step is that the IPMC will now have control of the GitHub auth.
>>
>> (1) What needs to be done to
Hi, Ignasi
We are glad to have you for being our project's new mentor. Thank you for
helping us.
--
Sheng Wu
Apache SkyWalking
-- Original --
From: "Ignasi Barrera";
Date: Wed, Jul 11, 2018 06:37 AM
To: "general";
Subject: Request
16 matches
Mail list logo